We use Vidyo for telemedicine. It is integrated into our telehealth solutions, specifically with Epic Solutions in the United States. In health care, telemedicine is not an option anymore; it is a must.
Vidyo offers a robust video conferencing platform designed for seamless communication. It caters to enterprises seeking high-quality video interactions with adaptability across industries.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Vidyo | 1.8% |
| Zoom Workplace Business | 7.4% |
| Webex | 5.2% |
| Other | 85.6% |
Vidyo enhances communication with its scalable architecture, supporting HD video quality and optimizing bandwidth usage for smooth connections. It integrates efficiently into existing workflows allowing enterprises to maintain operational continuity without significant disruptions. Designed with flexibility, it accommodates various industry-specific requirements, providing an adaptable solution for diverse environments.
What are the key features of Vidyo?Vidyo finds applications across healthcare, finance, and education sectors, enhancing telemedicine consultations, remote learning, and secure financial transactions. In healthcare, it enables real-time patient-doctor interactions, ensuring timely medical advice. In education, Vidyo supports interactive virtual classrooms, fostering engagement among students and educators. Finance professionals benefit from secure video channels for client discussions, ensuring data confidentiality and building trust.
Vidyo was previously known as VidyoConferencing.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Head of solutions at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | We use Vidyo for telemedicine, integrated with Epic Solutions in the U.S. It excels in video conferencing with features like waiting rooms, chat, and session recording. However, improvements in browser integration and third-party app compatibility are needed. |
| Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I appreciate this affordable, stable video conferencing solution for reducing travel and improving remote team collaboration. While deployment is easy, I wish screen sharing and direct partner support access were better. |
| Senior Project Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I value its video quality in lossy networks. With 3+ years and experience across many solutions, I advise using cloud-based platforms like Zoom due to lower TCO and better security. |
We use Vidyo for telemedicine. It is integrated into our telehealth solutions, specifically with Epic Solutions in the United States. In health care, telemedicine is not an option anymore; it is a must.
Vidyo has allowed us to conduct telemedicine efficiently without needing a lot of internet bandwidth. It offers an excellent video conferencing experience.
Vidyo is excellent for video conferencing, with a very high usage rate alongside Epic Solutions. It does not require a lot of internet availability. It has features like a video conferencing waiting room, the ability to chat with the end-user, and the ability to record sessions when allowed by security protocols.
It also allows the sharing of images, which is crucial in medical consultations like examining wounds or eye redness. Vidyo provides an outstanding video conferencing experience, making it highly effective in our telemedicine applications.
There are a few technical aspects that might need assistance, such as enabling Vidyo inside a web browser as opposed to using it via an SDK in an app.
Occasionally, issues can arise when using video conferencing in third-party applications. Feedback from developers could be beneficial for improving these areas.
It is very good and reliable. I am satisfied with its performance.
The support is different and very good. The upgrades and the work they do offer a positive experience.
Positive
There is a need for testing security, port management, and working with specific types of routers. This process can take a couple of weeks, so it is not straightforward.
The financial model of Vidyo is different. It can be expensive and is not cheap, but the pricing can be better negotiated depending on usage. It depends on how it aligns with your business model and usage needs. It is not a walk in the park and might require technical knowledge.
Vidyo works well for telemedicine but may have different results in other domains. It is recommended in our business domain.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Affordable Video conferencing - both for deployment side of things as well as telecommunication requirements (does not require a high end Internet connection to function).
3 common examples:
18 months
No, deployment of the system is very easy. Maybe the only challenge is translating the firewall requirements.
None encountered.
I haven't deployed a large scale deployment. In theory its very possible.
Excellent
Technical Support:I can't comment as I have to go via a Vendor so the tech support is not a one-to-one experience.
No previous solution used.
The only complexity is upgrading to the latest anchor release. Generally speaking if the unit is new there are minimal upgrades as they come pre-installed on the anchor version of the software.
Vendor and they know the product
I think for the companies with remote offices, they will experience a serious saving on travel costs. For companies with remote workforce, they will experience a increase in teamwork effectiveness.
There is licensing cost and there is maintenance cost. Both compared to buying more servers are negligible.
If you are setting up a meeting room, research and read up on lighting requirements. Vidyo have some good general guides in the VidyoRoom Admin documentations but if you are talking to resellers of the product they should know about this and doing this as a value add.
Video quality in lossy networks
3+ Years
I've used MS Lync, Cisco, Polycom, Huawei, LifeSize, RadVision/Avaya, Fuze, Zoom, Blue Jeans, GoToMeeting, WebEx and a few more...
There is no reason not to use cloud-based solutions these days (such as Zoom, Fuze, GoToMeeting or even Lync/Office365). Their total cost of ownership and total cost of replacement is an order of magnitude lower and they typically provide just as good (or better) security and privacy controls.