Cisco Secure Access is a comprehensive Security Service Edge (SSE) solution (a key component of a SASE solution) that addresses the complexities of securing a hybrid enterprise. Cloud-delivered and grounded in zero trust, it delivers a unique blend of user simplicity and IT efficiency for frictionless, secure access to all applications—SaaS (with gen AI), private apps, and the internet—regardless of user location or device. Secure Access protects users, data, and devices against relentless, sophisticated, and constantly evolving threats including AI-driven attacks and identity breaches.


| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Secure Access | 3.5% |
| Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 12.3% |
| Cato SASE Cloud Platform | 10.2% |
| Other | 74.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) | Feb 11, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Feb 11, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Cisco Secure Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | Feb 11, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Cisco Secure Access vs Netskope | Feb 11, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Cisco Secure Access vs Cato SASE Cloud Platform | Feb 11, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiGate | 4.2 | N/A | 92% | 581 interviewsAdd to research |
| Cisco Umbrella | 4.4 | N/A | 97% | 123 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 135 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 70 |
| Large Enterprise | 246 |
Provides all core SSE components (ZTNA, SWG, CASB, and FWaaS) plus extended capabilities.
Includes VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS), data loss prevention (DLP), AI Assistant, visibility/control/guardrails for generative AI use, digital experience monitoring (DEM), reserved IP, remote browser isolation (RBI), DNS-layer security, flexible security enforcement (in cloud or on-premises), policy verification, and more.
Protects users as they seamlessly access resources and apps with no extra steps needed, regardless of protocol, port, or level of customization
Simplifies IT operations through a single client, single dashboard, single license, and unified policies.
Lowers risk with least privilege, granular controls backed with unmatched threat intelligence of Cisco Talos.
Eases interoperability with other products from Cisco and third-party vendors with common administrative controls, data structures, and policy management.
Robust integrations
Integrates with Cisco Identity Intelligence to protect against the startling increase in identity-based attacks.
Integrates with many SAML Identity Providers (IDPs) such as AD, Azure AD, Okta, Ping, etc.
Integrates with Cisco offerings including SD-WAN, Splunk, XDR, Thousand Eyes, third party technologies such as Menlo RBI, Chrome Enterprise Browser, and AppOmni for SSPM.
1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Apple 6. Cisco Systems 7. Oracle 8. Intel 9. HP Inc. 10. Dell Technologies 11. Verizon Communications 12. AT&T 13. Comcast 14. T-Mobile 15. Sprint 16. Vodafone 17. Orange 18. BT Group 19. Deutsche Telekom 20. Telefonica 21. Nokia 22. Ericsson 23. Samsung Electronics 24. Sony 25. Panasonic 26. LG Electronics 27. Siemens 28. General Electric 29. Ford Motor Company 30. General Motors 31. Toyota Motor Corporation 32. Volkswagen Group
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Network Operations Engineer at Redex IT Limited | 4.0 | I've used Cisco Secure Access for five years; it's stable, scalable, and feature-rich, but expensive and has a steep learning curve. Support is excellent, though high costs limit appeal for smaller businesses despite its strong performance. |
| Cyber Security Manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | Cisco Secure Access has provided reliable, flexible remote connectivity with strong security for our users, though clearer guidance on ZTNA adoption and better third-party integration would improve it; overall, it's cost-effective and delivers a smooth user experience. |
| Manager, Network at Duracell International, Inc. | 4.0 | We use Cisco Secure Access for security and access management, appreciating its ease of use and reliability. Although integration with more third-party products would improve it, we've achieved great ROI after switching from Palo Alto and deploying it on Microsoft Azure. |
| Solution Architect at Velocis Systems | 4.0 | I’ve found Cisco Secure Access to be simple, secure, and well-documented, making it suitable for hybrid deployments. While ThousandEyes has strong capabilities, its pricing model is flawed. Cisco TAC support is good but needs improvement during shift changes. |
| Senior Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use Cisco Secure Access mainly as VPN SaaS for remote users; it’s stable, scalable, and easy to deploy with a clear GUI, delivering useful usage data. Support is strong, but maintenance notifications and post-check guidance need improvement. I rate it 8/10. |
| Deputy CISO at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used Cisco Secure Access to simplify secure, granular access across hybrid environments, improving user experience and reducing help desk load, though some routing issues exist. Overall, it's effective, scalable, and well-supported for our needs. |
| Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | Cisco Secure Access is a scalable, VPN-replacement solution that integrates well in Cisco environments, offers strong support and cloud features, but faces challenges with non-Cisco migrations and could improve AI differentiation and third-party integrations. |
| CTO at GT Group | 4.5 | I’ve used Cisco Secure Access for two years in finance/government, valuing its posture checks, ZTNA, AI visibility/time savings, and strong Identity Intelligence integration, with helpful support and acceptable pricing. It’s intuitive but needs fewer bugs, and I haven’t seen ROI. |