Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Control-M | 4.6% |
Camunda | 24.8% |
Temporal | 7.4% |
Other | 63.2% |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Camunda | 4.1 | 24.8% | 89% | 77 interviewsAdd to research |
Appian | 4.2 | 5.9% | 95% | 63 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 18 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 90 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 873 |
Midsize Enterprise | 402 |
Large Enterprise | 3166 |
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
Control-M was previously known as Control M.
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Control-M for 24 years and find it stable, scalable, and great for automation and file transfers, though reporting needs improvement. It's cost-effective long-term but licensing changes may impact affordability for some companies. |
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I focus on ensuring Control-M operates without disruption, prioritizing its reliability for our application teams. Its standout feature is seamless API integration. While support is excellent, cost improvements would enhance value. We've used Control-M for decades with success. |
Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed | 4.0 | I've used Control-M for 15 years to automate banking operations, drastically reducing processing time and errors. It's stable, scalable, easy to monitor, and integrates well, though AI features could improve. Implementation takes time but delivers solid ROI. |
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We use Helix Control-M to automate and integrate our cloud data workflows, finding its flexibility and user interface advantageous. Despite minor UI complexities and limited data storage, it significantly improves our efficiency compared to IBM Workload Automation. |
Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | Control-M is an effective job scheduler that simplifies managing complex tasks, offering a clear GUI for status alerts. It's cost-effective, supports orchestration, and outpaces competitors in evolving functionality, despite lacking extensive AI presently. |
Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering | 4.0 | We use Control-M for managing student data, server backups, and library catalog updates. Its automation features are accessible from one dashboard, though initial setup is complex. Despite high licensing costs, it has cut costs by up to 40%. |
Data scientist at Advarisk | 3.5 | I use Control-M for ACS and Azure integration, facilitating data processing and insights with OpenAI. Its speed and simplified workflow enhance efficiency over previous AWS solutions. However, better workflow integration and automation for developers are needed for improvement. |
Consultant at TE Connectivity | 3.0 | I've used Control-M for nearly a decade for automation, finding it stable and beneficial in productivity, though its AI and integration features need improvement; overall, it’s helpful but has room to grow, so I rate it six out of ten. |