Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Control-M | 4.6% |
Camunda | 25.8% |
Temporal | 7.5% |
Other | 62.1% |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Camunda | 4.1 | 25.8% | 89% | 77 interviewsAdd to research |
Appian | 4.2 | 5.9% | 95% | 63 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 18 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 90 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 871 |
Midsize Enterprise | 406 |
Large Enterprise | 3190 |
Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.
Control-M was previously known as Control M.
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I focus on ensuring Control-M operates without disruption, prioritizing its reliability for our application teams. Its standout feature is seamless API integration. While support is excellent, cost improvements would enhance value. We've used Control-M for decades with success. |
Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed | 4.0 | I've used Control-M for 15 years to automate banking operations, drastically reducing processing time and errors. It's stable, scalable, easy to monitor, and integrates well, though AI features could improve. Implementation takes time but delivers solid ROI. |
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We use Helix Control-M to automate and integrate our cloud data workflows, finding its flexibility and user interface advantageous. Despite minor UI complexities and limited data storage, it significantly improves our efficiency compared to IBM Workload Automation. |
Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | Control-M is an effective job scheduler that simplifies managing complex tasks, offering a clear GUI for status alerts. It's cost-effective, supports orchestration, and outpaces competitors in evolving functionality, despite lacking extensive AI presently. |
Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering | 4.0 | We use Control-M for managing student data, server backups, and library catalog updates. Its automation features are accessible from one dashboard, though initial setup is complex. Despite high licensing costs, it has cut costs by up to 40%. |
Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Control-M for 24 years and find it stable, scalable, and great for automation and file transfers, though reporting needs improvement. It's cost-effective long-term but licensing changes may impact affordability for some companies. |
Data scientist at Advarisk | 3.5 | I use Control-M for ACS and Azure integration, facilitating data processing and insights with OpenAI. Its speed and simplified workflow enhance efficiency over previous AWS solutions. However, better workflow integration and automation for developers are needed for improvement. |
CIO at Tembe Mogale Group | 3.5 | I use Control-M for orchestration due to its effective orchestration capabilities and valuable impact on task management, including file movement between environments. However, it needs better reporting and dashboards. It saves time and is preferable over Google Cloud's native tools. |