Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Control-M Logo

Control-M Reviews

Vendor: BMC
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

What is Control-M?

Featured Control-M reviews

Control-M mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Control-M in the Process Automation category stands at 4.6%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Control-M4.6%
Camunda25.8%
Temporal7.5%
Other62.1%
Process Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Control-M reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryProcess AutomationAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonControl-M vs CamundaAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonControl-M vs TemporalAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonControl-M vs Pega PlatformAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.125.8%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Appian4.25.9%95%63 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise90
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business871
Midsize Enterprise406
Large Enterprise3190
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
Retailer
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Government
4%
Educational Organization
3%
University
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Construction Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Control-M with alternative products

Learn more about Control-M

Control-M customers

Related questions

 
Control-M Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.5I focus on ensuring Control-M operates without disruption, prioritizing its reliability for our application teams. Its standout feature is seamless API integration. While support is excellent, cost improvements would enhance value. We've used Control-M for decades with success.
Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed4.0I've used Control-M for 15 years to automate banking operations, drastically reducing processing time and errors. It's stable, scalable, easy to monitor, and integrates well, though AI features could improve. Implementation takes time but delivers solid ROI.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees4.0We use Helix Control-M to automate and integrate our cloud data workflows, finding its flexibility and user interface advantageous. Despite minor UI complexities and limited data storage, it significantly improves our efficiency compared to IBM Workload Automation.
Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.5Control-M is an effective job scheduler that simplifies managing complex tasks, offering a clear GUI for status alerts. It's cost-effective, supports orchestration, and outpaces competitors in evolving functionality, despite lacking extensive AI presently.
Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering4.0We use Control-M for managing student data, server backups, and library catalog updates. Its automation features are accessible from one dashboard, though initial setup is complex. Despite high licensing costs, it has cut costs by up to 40%.
Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I've used Control-M for 24 years and find it stable, scalable, and great for automation and file transfers, though reporting needs improvement. It's cost-effective long-term but licensing changes may impact affordability for some companies.
Data scientist at Advarisk3.5I use Control-M for ACS and Azure integration, facilitating data processing and insights with OpenAI. Its speed and simplified workflow enhance efficiency over previous AWS solutions. However, better workflow integration and automation for developers are needed for improvement.
CIO at Tembe Mogale Group3.5I use Control-M for orchestration due to its effective orchestration capabilities and valuable impact on task management, including file movement between environments. However, it needs better reporting and dashboards. It saves time and is preferable over Google Cloud's native tools.