HPE Wireless WAN Reviews

I am unable to specify the exact use case for why we or our clients use HPE Wireless WAN, as we are in the service industry and work based on client requirements.

I am not involved in the purchase decision.

One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices.

I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity.

I use centralized management features such as WLC.

They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites.

This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool.

Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.

I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently.

However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features that other products have.

For example, Meraki is more comfortable compared to HPE in terms of adding and managing devices.

I have been using this solution for almost one to two years.

The solution is stable, and I do not see any challenges currently.

Stability always depends on the applications being used. Sometimes certain IT applications may not work with HPE, while they may not work with Meraki but work with Cisco.

This is an application-specific requirement, and device selection is always based on how internal applications work with the wireless solution.

HPE Wireless WAN is indeed a scalable solution, depending on specific needs.

Whether connecting IoT devices, security devices, or other equipment, there is substantial scope and comfort in scalability.

My experience with the technical support of HPE rates around eight on a scale of 1 to 10, where one is the worst and ten is the best.

Positive

I have not been in contact with Cisco ACI, FabricPath, or Cisco Umbrella for the last two years, as I shifted to Cisco Wireless and have been working exclusively on wireless for about a year.

I am not currently engaged with Cisco LAN and related areas.

The initial setup of the solution is straightforward. Once the initial setup is complete and the WLC is configured, the rest is quite easy.

It provides a plug-and-play environment.

We had a conversation about Cisco Secure Client in relation to this IT solution.

AT&T VPN was discussed previously, though I have not been in contact with it for the last couple of years.

I currently work with Cisco wireless solutions, along with Lancom wireless, Aruba, and Meraki.

Regarding the wireless Aruba tools, I primarily work with HPE Wireless WAN.

My relationship with HPE is that we are end-users, and I serve as an implementer for HPE.

I have worked primarily on-premises with this solution, though I have some limited experience with cloud deployment.

This review rates the solution 8 out of 10.

We use HPE Wireless WAN for hospital purposes. In our hospital, all the staff have laptops and move around, hence the need for wireless connectivity. We also provide guest access to patient rooms, including ICU rooms, where patients stay.

HPE Wireless WAN provides reliable connectivity. We use it for staff mobility and guest access in various hospital rooms, including ICUs. The wireless connectivity supports seamless movement for hospital staff with laptops.

Stability is an issue, as the access point becomes overloaded with more than twenty connections. Additionally, the current product uses two antennas. Increasing to four antennas could benefit us.

We have been using HPE Wireless WAN for around three to four years.

The solution works smoothly unless more than twenty users connect to a single access point, at which point it becomes overloaded.

It is scalable, rated between eight and nine out of ten. It can serve a significant number of users.

Technical support is average, rated six out of ten. The level one support lacks sufficient help, but solving issues through levels two and three is adequate.

Neutral

This is a greenfield hospital, so we did not have a prior solution. We use both Cisco and HP for different areas.

The setup is straightforward and easy to implement.

The deployment was done by an HP partner.

The price is compatible and not an issue for us.

HPE Wireless WAN is good, but level one technical support requires improvement. If addressed, I can recommend it. Overall, I rate the product nine out of ten, but support six out of ten.

We are a retail business with fashion stores across the Middle East, in Dubai, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, with more than 150 stores. We use HP Wireless in all of our stores, integrating it with mobile devices through applications. This is why we chose the HP Wireless solution.

We use HP Wireless as we previously relied on Cisco and FortiGate Wireless, which required a controller to manage all access points. We manage over 250 to 300 HP access points on the cloud. With HP, there is no need for a wireless controller, making it easier for administrators to manage devices. Additionally, HP Wireless offers competitive pricing compared to Cisco and Fortinet.

Integration might be improved, particularly with a single sign-on for Active Directory. Currently, our Windows users log in with different credentials, although many of our other applications integrate with Active Directory. If it's possible to integrate the HP access points with Active Directory, it would be beneficial. We also have guest users, and it would be useful to have time-restricted passwords for them, limiting their access to only the Internet.

We have been using this solution for almost two years now.

We have experienced no problems with stability.

We do not face any scalability challenges. We receive support from both HP and local XP partners, who are very helpful with implementation.

We contacted HPE support only once, for an RMA issue with a device that had physical problems. The device was replaced, and overall, we rely more on support from local HP partners.

Neutral

Previously, we used Cisco and FortiGate Wireless, which required a controller to manage all access points. Now, with HP, we have over 250 to 300 devices managed on the cloud, eliminating the need for a controller.

The setup was done by the local partner. We continually purchase XP Access Panels for new store openings. When we buy through the local partner, implementation is included.

The setup was done by the local partner.

I cannot give a number now, however, the overall project cost was compared with Fortinet and Cisco. We received a special discount from our local partner for HPE prices.

HPE Wireless offers easy approval due to its budget-friendly pricing. It is scalable and user-friendly for administrators, and its stability is commendable. We haven't faced any issues over almost two years of use. The ease of cloud-based management is a standout advantage. 

Overall product rating: Ten out of ten.

Our clients are mostly ministries. They need wireless for voice, video, and data. We provide them with solutions based on their requirements.

I like their features, such as reliability and high availability. Their network is more highly available compared to Cisco and others because they have features like Mobility Master and Mobility Conductors. Their solution is more stable compared to Cisco and others. They provide high availability with respect to clients and access points.

Mostly, I face problems with client connectivity and some devices, like Android. They need to focus on client devices to improve customer experience.

I have used the solution for approximately five or six years.

It is highly scalable, actually. I would rate it at nine out of ten.

I try to provide them with high technical solutions, following best practices to achieve the best results. I offer technical solution support whenever they need it.

Positive

The initial setup is not very easy. Anyone can do it, but it is difficult. They offer two types of solutions: one is cloud-based and the other is on-premises. The on-premises solution is complicated, while the cloud-based solution is very easy. The cloud offers zero-touch provisioning and plug-and-play capabilities, but the on-premises setup is complicated.

I recommend the solution. Wi-Fi is the backbone of every enterprise nowadays. Every enterprise depends on Wi-Fi. I prefer to go for wireless, like Wi-Fi 6, to enhance business outcomes and network availability. 

I would rate the product ten out of ten.

We use WAN for the automobile industry.

The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features. 

HP has wired the product range. The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers. 

They have to introduce new technologies and their road map, and only then can a customer collaborate with them. It will hardly take fifteen to twenty minutes. It depends on the site and where you are going to mount it.

I have been using HPE Wireless WAN for one year. 

The solution is highly scalable. 

The initial setup is straightforward.

If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model. If you need a feature-rich product, then they only have a feature model.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I use the solution for the library environment in our institution.

There are three devices we use in our institution for the same purposes.

Multiple people use the tool and connect to it seamlessly. Seamless connectivity could be achieved with the tool.

Aruba has taken over HPE, after which we have been facing certain problems with the product in our institution. There are pluses and minuses with all the technologies in the market, so I can't clearly comment on the tool's advantages. The stability and performance of the product is good.

Aruba has taken over HPE, and my institution is still evaluating HPE Wireless WAN.

The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further.

I have been using HPE Wireless WAN for more than ten years.

It is a good and stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

My institution is happy with the customer support provided by HPE.

I have experience with Dell.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in 30 days.

The product's installation phase was carried out with an in-house team and third-party help.

The cost is based on the features offered in the product. According to the features that my institution wants, we selected the product.

There is no need to make any payments on a yearly basis towards the licensing costs of the solution. The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it.

You need to select a product based on the purposes for which you need it.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to connect to networks.

The solution enables us to connect to the wireless network easily. We do not have any problems. It's a very good product. The tool is easy to manage.

The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic.

I have been using the solution for ten years.

The product is very stable. We did not face any issues.

The product is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have about 300 to 400 users in our organization. We use the tool regularly.

The setup is straightforward.

I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The price is very good. There are no additional costs associated with the tool.

I will recommend the solution to others. It is a valuable device. We use it for our daily operations. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

HPE OfficeConnect 1420 4G Switch is the most popular here. It is one of the OE and management switches from HP.

HPE should improve performance and stability.

I have been using HPE Wireless WAN as a partner for 20 years.

HPE Wireless WAN offers some performance and concurrency advantages but does not appear to have stackability or clustering capabilities.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

Some customers need to expand their HPE Wireless WAN from time to time. We generally tell about deprecated or discontinued products. We almost always take new items, but some products may have scalability issues.

Twenty people are working on this solution.

HPE Wireless WAN’s initial setup is straightforward, and customers can customize any solution through our partner portal. For example, we can customize solutions for printers or servers for our customers.

We need some items to test. I will ask the distributor what is in stock that we can use to do a show or a session for our customers to introduce this product.

We need an integrator for HPE wireless’s deployment.

The price is perfect for me. We have a large market for original HP tune-ups. We also create road maps for some customers for two- or three-year HP contracts. We will take a discount from our distributor.

HPE Wireless WAN is a good choice for small and large businesses. It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products.

We have HP customers and provide support for servers, printers, disposable nodes, ink, and Hikvision cameras. We supply Hikvision cameras with millions of dollars in revenue each year. We need solutions for universities and ministries funded by the government.

We are focusing on printers because we have a large market share in printers and ink. We are also introducing our customers to our other products, including larger-scale industrial copiers, Zebra labeling solutions, and warehouse management systems.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

A general use case for HPE Wireless WAN is as a backup solution for wireless connectivity, where users connect to the wireless network. Another use case for the product is for guest onboarding, integrated with your NOC solution.

What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers.

Any area for improvement in HPE Wireless WAN would depend on each user's experience, but its scalability has room for improvement. Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster.

I work on HPE Wireless WAN based on the requirement, so generally, once a technology needs an upgrade. I support multiple OEM solutions and separate devices, but I have a few years of experience with HPE Wireless WAN.

In terms of stability, HPE Wireless WAN is a seven because it depends on the environment. Stability could improve in the product based on the environment.

Scalability-wise, HPE Wireless WAN is a seven. Its scalability could be better.

The technical support for HPE Wireless WAN needs improvement. In particular, it could be faster.

The setup for HPE Wireless WAN is fine because I've been used to multiple-point solutions.

How long it takes to deploy the product depends on the infrastructure size.

Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware.

I'm a system engineer, and my company sells cloud-managed and on-premise solutions, including HPE Wireless WAN.

My company also uses HPE Wireless WAN internally.

I recommend HPE Wireless WAN based on its competitive features and customer use cases.

I rate the product as nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity.

We are working in an integrated company in Turkey and lots of projects that we are working on are using this product.

The initial setup is simple if you do a proper rollout and explain everything to the client.

The product is quite stable.

We've found the scalability to be good.

The technical support team has been quite helpful and responsive.

Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing.

It would be ideal if they developed more industrial synergies on the market.

I've used the solution for a number of years. It's easily been over ten. I've used it for quite a while. 

The stability of the solution is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The product can scale. If you are a company that needs to expand, you can do so.

We have a big technical team in our company. Lots of our engineers have Aruba certification, for example. They are well trained. However, when and if we need to reach out directly to Aruba about HPE Wireless, their team is quick to respond and very knowledgeable. They have been great and we are satisfied with their level of service. 

I am using both Huawei Wireless and HP Wireless WAN. We also use Cisco.

The initial setup can be complex, however, if you organize everything beforehand, it can be quite straightforward. 

Its pricing is not the best price on the market as Huawei and Ubiquiti are cheaper. The Aruba technology is comparable to Cisco. When we compare the prices to Cisco, they have better pricing on projects. Huawei prices are cheaper than the Cisco and Aruba however, if the Aruba sales team supports us, they can get us the best price for the project.

We're a partner. We help clients install this product into their environments.

Mostly, we use the private cloud in Turkey, however, often hybrid deployments are also used. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. For the most part, we are quite satisfied with the capabilities and the level of service we are provided.