Huawei Ethernet Switches deliver fast processing, seamless vendor integration, robust security, and cost-effectiveness, making them a preferred choice for networks of all sizes.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Huawei Ethernet Switches | 3.2% |
| Cisco Ethernet Switches | 9.0% |
| Aruba Switches | 8.9% |
| Other | 78.9% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Ethernet Switches | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Aruba Switches | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Cisco Ethernet Switches | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Cisco Catalyst Switches | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Ethernet Switches | 4.3 | 9.0% | 96% | 138 interviewsAdd to research |
| Aruba Switches | 4.2 | 8.9% | 98% | 88 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 174 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 104 |
| Large Enterprise | 148 |
Designed to excel in performance, Huawei Ethernet Switches offer an extensive, feature-rich environment without hidden costs. They support effortless setup and configuration via GUI or command-line. Known for high reliability and scalability, these switches enable efficient network management and AI-driven monitoring, complemented by low power consumption and robust support. However, areas like integration stability, pricing strategies, GUI improvements, and technical documentation require attention. Enhanced third-party compatibility and more competent DDoS protection could elevate performance, while better training opportunities might amplify market penetration.
What are the key features of Huawei Ethernet Switches?Huawei Ethernet Switches are integral in industries like telecommunications, banking, and education, effectively supporting infrastructure and connectivity from desktops to data centers. They are suitable for small businesses and critical environments such as hospitals, enabling reliable network connections for devices like cameras and workstations due to their cost-effectiveness and simple configuration.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Deputy Director at NITDA | 4.0 | I primarily use Huawei Ethernet Switches, focusing on both Huawei and Cisco devices. Huawei offers cost-effectiveness, good performance, easy configuration, and security features. However, it could benefit from adding some features that Cisco provides. |
| Senior Network Engineer at Bank Al Habib Limited | 3.5 | I explored Huawei Ethernet Switches for our data center and found their integration with automation tools valuable, allowing task execution via scripting. However, support quality needs improvement due to language barriers in my region. |
| Area Manager at Alpha Media Pte Ltd | 4.0 | I primarily use Huawei Ethernet Switches for networking, especially SaaS. Huawei offers flexibility with a wide range of products, but they should enhance their security offerings. While Cisco excels in security, Huawei remains competitively priced. |
| Senior Network Consultant at Advanced Technical Solutions | 4.0 | As a partner and integrator, I found Huawei Ethernet Switches easy to configure, with valuable features like a GUI for VLAN and routing setup. My experience was limited to basic functionalities, so I can't comment on advanced features or compare with Fortinet and Check Point. |
| Senior Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.5 | We've used Huawei Ethernet switches mainly for their cost-effectiveness compared to Cisco, despite some needing better customer support and services. Clients occasionally prefer Huawei for campus LAN networks, although Cisco offers more reliable upgrades and durable switches. |
| Head Of Information Technology Department at Evyol Group | 3.5 | I chose Huawei Ethernet Switches for their competitive cost and simpler training process compared to Cisco. Despite their simple configuration and effective firewall, the switches have integration issues and stability shortcomings that need improvement within my company's network. |
| Senior Manager Technology at CNS Engineering | 3.5 | We primarily use Huawei Ethernet Switches for banking and finance applications. They're easy to deploy, cost-effective, and offer built-in AI for monitoring, but they need hardware improvements and better technical support to compete with rivals in harsher environments. |
| Infrastructure Manager at a retailer with 501-1,000 employees | 3.0 | I find Huawei Ethernet Switches affordable, though we face synchronization issues, especially with ONTs. Despite trying different configurations, some problems persist. While considering different solutions, we rely on router switches for our server needs without cloud involvement. |
| Expert Transport Planning Carrier, Enterprise & IP(Team Lead) at Mobilink GSM | 4.0 | We use Huawei Ethernet Switches for telecom services in customer edge deployments. Their features align well with telecom needs, offering improved capacity and power efficiency. Despite lacking virtualized switch functionality, Huawei's performance surpasses Juniper's, providing better support and free upgrades. |
| Technical Director at Infosyte Sdn Bhd | 5.0 | In my review of Huawei Ethernet Switches, I found their scalability to be excellent. Incorporating AI in the future could enhance them further, particularly in diagnostic areas. While they face competition, maintaining innovation and competitive pricing is crucial for market leadership. |
I mainly use Huawei Switches and also work with Huawei Wireless. I deal with both Huawei and Cisco Switches, and I find Huawei to be more cost-effective.
Huawei has helped to save costs and is cost-effective, which also helps save time for the company.
The performance of Huawei is good, and it provides security capabilities. Huawei is easy to configure, which is valuable.
There could be improvements in Huawei, such as adding features that Cisco has and Huawei currently lacks.
I have been using Huawei for at least five months as it was around that time when I provided feedback for Huawei Wireless.
The solution provides scalability that fits small, medium, or enterprise-level businesses.
I have had a good experience with the technical support of Huawei. The support is almost perfect, and I would rate it highly.
Positive
I also work with Cisco, and it seems like I use both Huawei and Cisco Switches in my operations.
Though I did not delve into specifics, I find Huawei to be easy to configure.
Huawei is cheaper compared to Cisco, with a significant cost advantage.
I have experience with Cisco Switches alongside Huawei.
Overall, I would rate Huawei Switches at seven or eight out of ten.
My company is considering using the solution in our data center. Currently, we are not using the tool in our data center. I just visited PeerSpot's website for reviews and to get the opinion of those who have already used Huawei in the data center. I was looking for the reviews of the people who have already used Huawei in their data centers.
The steps we follow for Cisco are the same as we follow for Huawei. We need to complete all the minimum or basic configuration requirements of the switches, and then we deploy the switches at our remote offices or branches to get started with the product. I haven't had any experience with the tool in my data center.
The most valuable feature of Huawei is that it already provides integration with any automation tool. You can write a script in any of the languages, put that file into the Huawei, and execute the task, whatever you want, based on logs or events that trigger inside the device.
The tool's support is not good, making it an area where improvements are required. In the region where I belong, I get an engineer from the tool's support team all the time. The tool's support team and I have a language barrier, so neither of us can understand how we talk.
I have fifteen years of experience with Huawei Ethernet Switches. I used Huawei as a branch user at a remote office, not in a data center.
It is a stable solution. It is similar to Cisco.
The tool's scalability depends only on the design you are opting for when designing some network. It is not with the vendor or the principal. It is the design that we are doing. In the recent scenario where we have a software-defined data center, like Cisco ACI and Huawei SDN, I would say that both can handle large data centers. It all depends on the design, the type of devices, the capacity, and what capacity planning we consider when designing the network.
The equipment from Huawei and Cisco in my organization is not for an end user. The tool is to provide network connectivity for end users. We have different products. I don't exactly have a number to explain how many end users are connected via Huawei and Cisco.
The solution's technical support issue resolution time is very good, and it is similar to that of Cisco. It is very difficult for the technical person involved in the tool to understand or elaborate on the complete problem.
I don't have any complaints about the product's initial setup phase. I talked with my local partner, who said they are working on the tool to overcome any issues.
Huawei has the same licensing model as Cisco, so both are working on the subscription model. Huawei and Cisco fall under the same price bracket. I don't have an idea about the pricing, but I think the price of both tools may have a very small difference.
When it comes to integrations, Huawei's remote site switches, especially the small and medium business series switches, are capable enough to integrate with Cisco ISE solutions. It is also capable of being integrated with SolarWinds and IBM QRadar, which is a network security tool from IBM. I was looking for the operational review of the Huawei devices inside the data center because on our edge devices or remote devices, the user device LAN card is a maximum of up to one year, and the user cannot send traffic of more than 100 MB. When you place a server inside the data center, its traffic is usually five, eight, or ten GB. Sometimes, you have a large organization in which the server transmits and receives where the LAN card's speed or sending of traffic is more than ten GB. I want to know the experience of the people who already use Huawei in big places with too much traffic.
I think Huawei is a good product, and there are no issues with it.
Switches are the devices which are used for providing the network space for the end user or server, so it is difficult to explain the benefit of the tool. If I am looking for a specific vendor, I can consider the features of their tool along with the value, specific value, and in-house developed features. Huawei and Cisco devices are good for networking in any organization.
I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
Huawei offers a wide range of products to choose from, which provides flexibility in deployment.
Huawei should focus more on security. They need more products on the security side to improve the security portion.
I have not experienced any significant issues with stability. So far, the meantime between failures is quite low.
The scalability of Huawei Ethernet Switches is satisfactory, with good scalability and tracking features.
Local support in Singapore is fine, and I would rate the support from Huawei at eight out of ten.
Positive
Huawei's product is compared to Cisco, which is considered better in terms of security. However, Huawei is very competitive in product pricing.
The initial setup is quite easy, and the installation process is straightforward.
Huawei Ethernet Switches offer very competitive and aggressive product pricing compared to other brands.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We are partners and work for the customer as a partner as well as an integrator. The use case is for connecting a central location with some branches using Huawei Ethernet Switches.
The configuration is easy with a GUI apart from the command line. We used only the basic features, focusing on configuring VLANs and routing between them.
The most valuable features are the ease of configuration, availability of a GUI apart from the command line, and basic features such as VLAN configuration and routing between VLANs.
I did not delve into advanced features or security implementations, so I cannot comment on those areas. Possibly more advanced features could need improvement.
The stability is good based on my experience with basic features. I cannot comment on the advanced level as I didn't work with them.
Scalability depends on the infrastructure. For a small setup, it works well. However, for bigger setups, more people might be required.
We have also used Fortinet and Check Point. I am not in a place to differentiate Huawei Ethernet Switches from these.
The configuration is easy with a GUI available apart from the command line. Time for setup varies because integrating with existing networks and other vendors can extend the process.
If you work more deeply with the product, you will come to know more about its capabilities and issues.
We've used them in shopping malls, hotels, and educational institutions for their campus LAN networks, along with Cisco switches and WLCs.
The product supported our customers' business growth thus far. It helps our customers' businesses.
The customers mainly choose Huawei instead of Cisco due to pricing. Huawei offers similar features at a cheaper price compared to Cisco.
In some projects, I've observed that they are willing to lower their prices to compete with Cisco and expand their market share.
There is room for improvement in the customer support and services. The response time could be better.
Huawei can add AI-driven features to Ethernet switches.
I have worked with this solution for one to two years.
In some cases, they are scalable. With some modular switches, you can add network interface module cards for future expansion and increased user capacity.
I would rate the scalability of Huawei switches as seven out of ten. There is room for improvement here.
We have sought their support in some cases, and they are good too.
Neutral
I'm focused on Cisco business. But in some cases, if we can't convince a customer to go with Cisco, we provide Huawei as a quality solution. And in a few cases, customers specifically want Huawei, so we provide that as well. We have a diverse product range.
Specifically, Cisco provides timely iOS and firmware upgrades regularly. Customers also appreciate the longevity of Cisco switches, which can be used for ten years without any hassle.
I would rate the ease of managing Huawei Ethernet Switches an eight out of ten. It's easy.
It is also easy to implement in the first place. Not much configuration is needed. It's easier to finish.
Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten. Because in some cases, issues happen. With the PoE (Power over Ethernet) switches, customers sometimes purchase 24-volt PoE features in Huawei, and the core or five ports don't work. Compared to Cisco, this happens much earlier in the switch's lifespan. I've seen this in some switches, so it could be improved.
The main reason I chose Huawei Ethernet Switches was because when I received the purchase quotation, Huawei gave me a timeline of seven months, but on the other hand, Cisco gave me a timeline of one and a half months to deliver the switches. I wanted to upgrade my network, which is the first reason why I chose Huawei. The second reason I chose Huawei Ethernet Switches was because of its cost. The product is cost-effective. The third reason for choosing Huawei Ethernet Switches was because its training phase was simpler compared to Cisco.
The solution's most valuable feature is its very simple configuration. The tool's built-in firewall is quite good. For the tool's efficiency, I can rate the solution as seven and a half out of ten.
The product does not integrate well with the other components in my company's network. For example, some Cisco switches do not support SFP on layer-3 switches, which is the same problem I face with Huawei Ethernet Switches. My company also has some other problems with the product, but those are not huge issues.
The product's stability has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required.
I have been using Huawei Ethernet Switches for more than a year.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Around 100 to 200 people in my company use the product.
The support offered by the product is normal, meaning it is not very good.
My company's network administrator can handle all the activities and issues related to the product.
The product's initial setup phase is not very complex.
The solution can be deployed in more than a year.
I would say that the product is cost-effective.
There are many products that I have integrated with Huawei Ethernet Switches in my company's data center.
I rate the product's impact on my company's data center efficiency an eight out of ten.
Others who want to start using the product should know that it is a cost-effective tool and that it is easy to approach its distributor.
The energy-saving capabilities of Cisco are better than those of Huawei.
I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
Our use cases are mainly for banking, finance, and stock exchange companies.
The tool's valuable features are easy to deploy and troubleshoot with available documentation. They are cost-effective and can reduce operational expenses. Huawei Ethernet Switches have built-in AI features for monitoring and analytics. These are the tool's solutions, not third-party integrations.
The tool is not very robust in harsh environments. Issues with cooling and power can cause these switches to fail, which concerns customers. They work well in data centers but might be problematic in places without cooling or heat.
Huawei Ethernet Switches could improve by enhancing their hardware and internal chip. These changes are necessary because their capacity, particularly in handling ACLs, is currently lower than that of competitors like Cisco. For example, Huawei Ethernet Switches support up to 4,000 entries, whereas competitors' products can handle up to 8,000.
The product should also improve technical support on quick response and language barrier.
I have been working with the product for four to five years.
I rate the product's stability a seven out of ten.
The platform is not scalable.
Huawei Ethernet Switches' deployment takes three to four hours to complete.
Huawei Ethernet Switches are cheap and cost around ten dollars.
Huawei Ethernet Switches require an on-premises solution because they cannot be deployed on the cloud. This makes it always a custom model. I rate it a seven out of ten.
It is cheap. Another reason is that we cannot change to another product already. It's GPON, and it's not quite cheap. Something might probably change around half a million.
Generally, the core features of wireless networking equipment from Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus are similar. All three vendors offer the ability to configure basic features such as DHCP, routing, and security.
Huawei has a lot of issues; it's not in sync properly. For instance, if the ONT is down, there's another problem with another ONT that is not functioning correctly. Even after configuring the siding, I cannot reach some other side, and I don't know why it's happening.
Another concern was with the ONT and using fiber.
We recently migrated from Nokia to Huawei. After migrating, at least, there were some failures, some of which impacted operations.
So far, not very stable.
We've had an issue with one of the Power Trip ports not working properly.
It's scalable. We can add new switches to an ORT easily. This is not the same as adding new switches to an ONT, but it is a similar process. We can use a GPON splitter to add more users to the network, which is comparable to how traditional networks are scaled.
We've been using the Nokia switches for a few years, and we have about 1000 users. We just started using the Huawei switches this year, so we don't have any data on how many users are using them yet.
The technical support from Huawei is not very good. We've had to wait a week or a month for them to provide a solution to some of our problems. So it's quite time-consuming.
For the switches, the premise set is done for maintenance.
I often draw comparisons with Cisco, where we can use the command line for the show, whereas with Huawei, it is displayed differently. However, it is essential to note that all the features supported by Cisco are also supported by Huawei.
We have a vendor, and the project team is responsible for the deployment.
We maintain the solution, but we still have a managed service from Vendor. If we have any troubleshooting or issues related to the vendor, they handle it.
It is a china brand. This is not a good product, but it's very cheap compared with Cisco, another Ruckus, kind of compared with Huawei, Huawei from China, the prices are very cheap.
We are using router switches as far as the server. Everything we are using.
I would recommend using HPE or Cisco switches instead. I would give them a six out of ten. They're not the worst switches I've used, but they're not the best either.
The primary use case of the solution is used in the Telecom, Customer Edge where services are being deployed.
With Huawei Ethernet Switches, the backline capacity on our switches has improved, and the port density has. Ports are available at 1G, 10G, and 100G levels. This means we only need one new switch to add more value, as opposed to our previous 10G switches.
The required functionalities align with telecom requirements and have improved from a capacity perspective. Additionally, power efficiency has been added, resulting in a more stable work platform. We used Juniper but struggled with it due to bugs and other issues. However, I have not seen anything like that with Huawei. Huawei provides free-of-cost batch upgrades to all networks worldwide if they find something that needs to be upgraded. Huawei usually recommends what we require so that they have symmetrical patches worldwide.
The solution can improve by adding virtualized switch functionality. Huawei mentioned virtual switches in one of the product sheets, but when we got to the deployment phase, it turned out that they didn't actually include virtual switching functionality. Other than that, the switch and network are performing well and meeting our requirements.
I have been using the solution for eight years.
The solution is extremely stable.
We purchase the switch with 1U and it is not modular. We have to live with that. Or, if we have 2U, 3U, or 4U switches, we already have those four. It's not that complex to scale. We have to do the ordering and it takes three months.
We previously used Juniper and switched to Huawei Ethernet Switches after we completed an RFP. Juniper was cheaper but did not meet the rest of our requirements. Huawei's telecom services such as media gateways, MSCs, and Packet Core are better. The main reason we switched to Huawei is that they also offer free of cost web of IP cost.
The dedicated team here at the client's office assists with installation and other tasks. However, for anything configuration-related, we initially communicate with the subcontractors, specifying what we want. We then distribute IP addresses and other necessary information. We do not always need to be involved in the process; the subcontractors are already familiar with the design. We base our switch deployments on purchase orders from Juniper. Once the switches are delivered, we lock them down and they become automatic.
The full deployment takes between one month and 45 days.
The implementation was completed in-house with the assistance of a subcontractor.
I give the solution eight out of ten.
The solution requires maintenance but it is not difficult.
I recommend the solution for the double platform, from a stability perspective, and according to the need of the organization.
The most valuable aspect of Huawei Ethernet Switches is their excellent scalability.
In the future, incorporating AI features into Ethernet switches, particularly in the controller base, would be beneficial. This could help pinpoint errors, diagnose issues, and improve overall efficiency. Innovation and competitive pricing are key to staying ahead in the market.
Huawei's scalability is excellent, offering a wide range of switches from low-end to carrier-grade, catering to various deployment needs. They cover the spectrum from low-end to extremely high-end switches, including service provider-level equipment. I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten.
Huawei's support is solid, especially in Malaysia, with robust RMA, software support, and flexibility in additional assistance. I would rate the support around a nine out of ten.
Positive
Pricing has slightly increased but remains competitive, and the supply chain during COVID-19 was less impacted compared to competitors like Cisco.
Competitors like Cisco face challenges due to inconsistent support and retrenchment issues. While brands like Arista and Juniper are present, they haven't reached the same level of market share as Cisco. However, Huawei faces competition mainly from other Chinese brands, particularly in the security sector.
Huawei Ethernet Switches are generally solid with features comparable to other vendors like Cisco and HPE.
I wouldn't recommend Huawei Ethernet Switches for companies without robust support contracts, as Huawei's support and RMA services are strong. My concerns about Huawei switches are often political rather than technical, as there haven't been reported security breaches.
Managing Huawei Ethernet Switches can be done via web-based or CLI interfaces, with some customers opting for Huawei's SDN controller for easier management.
Overall, I would rate Huawei Ethernet Switches as a ten out of ten.
