IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management stands out for its robust Agile Scrum planning, lifecycle traceability, and tool management, offering cloud-based configurability and strong collaboration features.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) | 3.8% |
Jira | 20.0% |
Microsoft Azure DevOps | 14.9% |
Other | 61.3% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Jira | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Polarion ALM | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 14.9% | 95% | 135 interviewsAdd to research |
Jira | 4.1 | 20.0% | 91% | 275 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 4 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 44 |
Midsize Enterprise | 50 |
Large Enterprise | 205 |
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management provides rich capabilities for Agile project management, facilitating requirements and test management, configuration management, and version control. Its integration with IBM Doors supports comprehensive requirements handling, and the cloud-based platform enhances collaborative efficiency across teams. Despite needing advances in user-friendliness and reporting, ELM's global configuration and compliance features make it invaluable in demanding environments.
What are the key features of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is vital in sectors like automotive and manufacturing, where it implements Agile frameworks to manage requirements, conduct testing, and handle defects. It integrates into development pipelines ensuring live traceability and visibility, supporting critical engineering processes efficiently.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) was previously known as IBM Engineering Rhapsody, Rational ALM, MKS.
Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH | 3.0 | I primarily use IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management alongside DOORS for complex software presentations, as its automation greatly aids analysis. However, improvements in usability and better integration with Rhapsody are needed compared to user-friendly competitors like Enterprise Architect. |
Heaad of Automation Devision at Alstom Ferroviaria S.p.A. | 3.5 | I use IBM Rational ALM in our manufacturing company to manage requirements and testing. Its integration with other IBM tools and reporting capabilities add value. However, the complex user interface could be simplified for non-technical users. |
Product Owner at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees | 2.5 | I use IBM Rational ALM to plan development, valuing its customizability and strong compliance features, though it lacks sophisticated reporting, user-friendly GUI, and effective planning tools. I'm currently evaluating Jira due to these limitations. |
Global IT Director of Digital Platforms. Digital and Connected Commerce at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 2.0 | Our team of 15 to 20 software engineers used IBM Rational ALM for testing. While the cloud-based feature is valuable, interconnectivity issues and the need for better trace matrix ability exist. We saw no ROI and transitioned to Atlassian. |
Owner at Qstec | 4.0 | I oversee a team using IBM Rational ALM, finding its workflow capabilities enhance collaboration and integration between development and production teams. However, development features could improve. I haven't used similar solutions before IBM Rational ALM. |
Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited | 4.5 | <p>I recommend IBM Rational ALM to clients after thorough R&D, ensuring stability and performance improvements. However, greater third-party integration, UI enhancements, and built-in reporting customization are needed for a more user-friendly experience without relying on external tools.</p> |
Senior Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.5 | I use IBM Rational ALM for end-to-end development solutions with a valuable global configuration feature. However, it needs to be more lightweight by removing unused features. Overall, it's effective without considering alternate solutions or specific cloud providers. |
Associate QA Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |