We're using IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor for infrastructure monitoring, particularly for monitoring devices, tools, systems, switches, routers, and servers.
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor efficiently monitors and manages IT infrastructure, offering real-time analytics and alerts to optimize performance and prevent downtime.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor | 0.5% |
| Zabbix | 3.9% |
| SolarWinds NPM | 3.6% |
| Other | 92.0% |
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring for servers, apps, and networks, ensuring seamless operations. It delivers detailed insights through customizable dashboards, offering full visibility into enterprise IT health. Users benefit from automated alerting, performance metrics, and capacity planning tools that enhance reliability and reduce risks of outages.
What are the key features of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor?IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail where maintaining high availability is critical. It supports IT teams in proactively managing infrastructure, ensuring systems are responsive, secure, and capable of meeting growth demands.
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor was previously known as IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time.
TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Special Assistant to the Governor ICT COO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees | 4.0 | IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor efficiently handles our infrastructure monitoring needs, particularly for devices, tools, and systems. I appreciate its versatile licensing options, though I wish for better community updates and sustainability improvements. We chose it over unstable open-source alternatives. |
| Owner at David Strom Inc. | 4.0 | I found it easy to set up for monitoring physical and virtual servers, with automation for self-healing. Although restricting user reports is hard, it suits mid-enterprises for comprehensive server/app monitoring, SLA, and capacity planning. |
| SaaS Operations Tier 1 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | My company switched from Nagios to up.time for its ease of use and functions. We now monitor over 300 systems, including databases, from one place, making our monitoring efforts significantly easier than before. |
| Senior Systems Administrator at a hospitality company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I found deployment simple and enjoyed the dashboards and reduced MTTD, with excellent support. However, I've had vCenter integration and scalability issues, and wish maintenance windows were streamlined. My advice is to start small. |
| System Administrator at a reseller with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | No summary available |

We're using IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor for infrastructure monitoring, particularly for monitoring devices, tools, systems, switches, routers, and servers.
What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization.
My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.
What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc.
I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve.
It's my second year of using IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor.
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is a stable solution.
My organization can scale IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor when it has additional resources to target. When increasing the number of nodes, the organization typically lets IDERA know ahead of time, and IDERA would include the additional cost from scaling in the next payment.
You can scale the solution without problems. It's a seamless process, so I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
Before my organization subscribed to IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, it had issues with the support, but after subscribing, the support team was always available.
If you're a first-timer and haven't subscribed to the solution, you might not necessarily get the support you require. However, once you subscribe, the IDERA support team will put in a lot of effort to provide you with the support you need.
Overall, I'm satisfied with the support, so I'm giving the IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor team a seven out of ten.
Neutral
Initially, my organization had to get support for setting up IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor because of some system technicalities. Afterward, it became easier to set it up because of more familiarity with how to do it.
The initial setup for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor took one hour, and overall, I'm rating the setup as eight out of ten.
I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten.
We evaluated two open-source solutions, but I cannot recall their names. We went with IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor because the open-source products weren't as stable.
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is deployed on the cloud, particularly on AWS and GCP.
My organization has around three hundred nodes and seven or eight IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor users.
My rating for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is eight out of ten.
Easy to setup and begin monitoring. Works with both virtual and physical servers. You can automate some common self-healing tasks to restart servers, for example.
While you can restrict particular users to only see subsets of the reports, it isn't as easy as it could be.
It is designed for mid-enterprises that will monitor physical, virtual and cloud servers and applications, along with mechanisms for enforcing service level agreements and provide for capacity planning.
My company used to us Nagios for there monitoring systems. We switched over to up.time for the ease of use and the functions that were available in maintaining the monitor environments.
When I first started looking at up.time software at my company we only had 90 monitors checking out the basic functions of the servers we have. Now with the features given through up.time we have over 300 + monitors constantly checking every environment that we have and also checking out databases for errors. This makes it a lot easier for the team I work with do to the fact that we can look at one place and see what is all wrong or in a warning status.
Dashboards
Reduced MTTD
Maintenance windows need to be streamlined.
Over 4 years
No, it was quick (30 days)
Yes, we've had issues with the vCenter integration.
Yes, without Oracle it is difficult to grow.
5 stars! Excellent.
Technical Support:5 stars! Excellent.
Yes, HP OpenView, which was too difficult to administer.
It was simple.
A combination of in-house and vendor reployment.
Yes we evaluated Solarwinds, Nagios and others.
Plan to start with a small implementation using a scrum release. Evolve the up.time implementation by later adding dashboards, topological dependencies, SLAs and more.
Pros:
Monitors servers, webpages, network devices, and anything with an SNMP interface (both queries and traps).
Has a high-availability fail-over option.
Full support for linux as well as Windows including running the monitor itself on linux.
Multiple database support including SQLserver, mySQL and Oracle.
One-click discovery of a vCenter
Alerts can be sent out via email, pager or script. (All elements of an alert can be handed to a perl script for example)
The text of email alerts can be easily customized for each alert profile.
Only requires a single port through firewalls.
Easy to create customized dashboards.
Cons:
I'd like to see a tighter model for user privileges.
I'd like to have more granularity about what each group can see.
General:
This company is extremely responsive to bug reports and feature requests. Their whole crew (sales, support, engineering) are located in Toronto, Canada.