InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| InfluxDB | 4.9% |
| PostgreSQL | 13.5% |
| Firebird SQL | 11.0% |
| Other | 70.6% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datadog | 4.3 | N/A | 97% | 208 interviewsAdd to research |
| Zabbix | 4.2 | N/A | 95% | 108 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 140 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 76 |
| Large Enterprise | 202 |
InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.
InfluxDB offers its users:
InfluxDB Benefits
There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.
Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”
ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Team Lead, Software at Energybox | 3.5 | I use InfluxDB Cloud for high-volume IoT sensor data, appreciating its time-series capabilities and managed service. Still, lack of China cloud support, frequent version changes, and query timeouts are drawbacks, leading to my 7/10 rating. |
| Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees | 4.0 | InfluxDB is excellent for my real-time monitoring and anomaly detection needs, with its scalable time-series storage and powerful query language boosting system reliability and operational efficiency. I wish for better Flux documentation and advanced analytics. |
| Senior System Developer at Norled | 5.0 | I use InfluxDB for continuous vessel tracking, finding it extremely stable and scalable over seven years. Its core functionality is critical, though backups in Azure Kubernetes and data replication pose challenges. |
| Deployment Engineer at Derq | 4.0 | I used InfluxDB for real-time LEO satellite KPI monitoring, valuing its time-series performance and integration. While it's economical and stable with Kafka, I found integration documentation insufficient and desired a NoSQL option. |
| DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital | 3.5 | I value InfluxDB for its extremely fast writes, alerts, and reduced downtime for monitoring. Though stable, its Flux query language has a learning curve, and essential scaling features are costly enterprise-only options. |
| Network engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use InfluxDB for monitoring Cisco devices with Prometheus and Grafana, finding it stable and easy to use, saving time. It's a great solution, though I'd like automated backups and enhanced security features. |
| DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital | 3.5 | I use InfluxDB for log monitoring and SRE analytics, valuing its long-term data series, open-source nature, and scalability. While stable and time-saving, I wish it handled metrics better, similar to Prometheus, and consolidated data sources. |
| Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use InfluxDB for greenhouse sensor data visualization, valuing its stability and Excel-like organization. While it reduced project time, I find its interface complex and require Grafana for better visualization, leading to a 7/10 rating. |