Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Mule ESB?

Get the report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured Mule ESB reviews

Mule ESB mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Mule ESB in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category stands at 18.7%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Mule ESB18.7%
IBM Integration Bus21.9%
webMethods.io11.1%
Other48.300000000000004%
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

PeerResearch reports based on Mule ESB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEnterprise Service Bus (ESB)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonMule ESB vs IBM Integration BusAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonMule ESB vs webMethods.ioAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonMule ESB vs Oracle Service BusAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
webMethods.io4.011.1%94%93 interviewsAdd to research
IBM DataPower Gateway4.26.0%96%29 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise24
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business135
Midsize Enterprise88
Large Enterprise442
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Retailer
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
University
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
 
Mule ESB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees4.5In my industry, Mule ESB excels at connecting and harmonizing data across systems. Its standout features include a low-code concept, efficient API design, and powerful data transformation using DataWeave. More support for Kubernetes integration would be beneficial.
Solutions Architect at Metrobank4.0We use Mule ESB for connecting our microservices and legacy systems to the mainframe, finding it robust, scalable, and beneficial for API management, though it could improve in agility. We're expanding our contract due to positive ROI.
Enterprise Integration Architect at Tata Consultancy4.5I use Mule ESB for enterprise integration due to its all-in-one platform and hybrid deployment. It's reduced manual tasks, but costs and upgrades are challenging. Despite being pricier than competitors, I rate it a solid nine overall.
Technology Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees4.0We use Mule ESB primarily for integration projects at multinational companies, valuing its API-led architecture and exemplary API management capabilities. While effective, it could improve its multi-file transfer functionality and handling of large data volumes.
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.5I primarily use Mule ESB for integrating sources and destinations with custom logic, utilizing its valuable features like DataWeave and batch processing. While performance improvements are needed, it remains competitive against Spring Integration, WSO2, and Dell Boomi.
Senior Associate at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.0We use Mule ESB primarily for creating APIs and integrating with messaging systems, particularly benefiting from its Salesforce connectors. However, the policy propagation between environments and lack of a built-in reconnection strategy for third-party connections need improvement.
Readiness Manager/Business Analytics for GCC India Operations at Ericsson3.0I use Mule ESB for API implementation, enabling partners to access information through our APIs. Despite its benefits, it presents coding challenges. I have experience with webMethods.io and TIBCO, both offering easier integration options. We considered other market solutions.
Director at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I lead an integration team working with Mule ESB, valued for its control and runtime planes. Despite its ease of configuration, challenges include high licensing costs, preference for on-premises solutions in the banking sector, and inconsistent support.