No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
OpenText AccuRev Logo

OpenText AccuRev Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.3 out of 5

What is OpenText AccuRev?

Featured OpenText AccuRev reviews

OpenText AccuRev mindshare

As of April 2026, the mindshare of OpenText AccuRev in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText AccuRev1.0%
Jira12.3%
Microsoft Azure DevOps10.3%
Other76.4%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText AccuRev reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesApr 4, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 4, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText AccuRev vs JiraApr 4, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText AccuRev vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsApr 4, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText AccuRev vs OpenText Application Quality ManagementApr 4, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.110.3%95%137 interviewsAdd to research
Jira4.112.3%91%281 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise13
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Performing Arts
8%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Legal Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Computer Software Company
4%
Logistics Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Government
2%
Leisure / Travel Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
 
OpenText AccuRev Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions5.0AccuRev provides all necessary features for compliance and offers good ROI at a lower cost. However, I found its interface unintuitive, with poor documentation, making it very difficult to learn and use efficiently despite its capabilities.
Associate Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5I primarily use this stable and scalable solution for testing, valuing its snapshot feature. While I recommend it with a 9/10 rating, I believe its pricing could be more competitive.
Owner at iQST5.0I consider this a superior solution with excellent BPT features and scalability. Installation is easy. While stable, customers often lack the knowledge to fully leverage its complex capabilities, requiring more training to maximize potential.
Owner at iQST5.0I rate this solution 10/10 for its scalability and easy setup, valuing the BPT feature. While stable, I'd like a code repository. Customer understanding is crucial, as the product itself is excellent.
Installer developer / CMSupport at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.5Having used AccuRev for seven years, I find it a stable product with valuable features and good support, despite a complex initial setup. It has no issues, but source code conflicts are a drawback.
Build, Release and Deployment Integrator at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees4.5After three years, AccuRev proves a flexible, stable, and scalable SCM solution with excellent support. Its stream inheritance and change packages offer significant ROI over ClearCase, despite its centralized nature, making it a highly recommended choice.
Associate Project Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I appreciate AccuRev's user-friendly UI and features, leading us to switch from ClearCase. However, I've encountered performance and stability issues, including server restarts, and desire better on-call customer support. It's suitable for mid-sized teams.
Developer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.0I found it easy to use on Windows with a good feature set, custom merge/diff applications, and stream cross-promotion. While packaging is good, I noted limited reporting features for management.