Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText AccuRev Logo

Top 10 OpenText AccuRev Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top OpenText AccuRev Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText AccuRev based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Jama Connect, TFS, and GoCD. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OpenText AccuRev Logo
Jama Connect
3.8 out of 5
OpenText AccuRev Logo
Jama Connect
3.8 out of 5
Jama Connect focuses on collaborative requirements management and rapid implementation with SaaS deployment. In comparison, OpenText AccuRev excels in process automation for complex environments, supporting a client-server model ideal for centralized operations.
Download Jama Connect vs. OpenText AccuRev Report
Jama Connect offers a more straightforward setup process, while OpenText AccuRev's setup involves more complexity and time.
View comparison
Pricing
Jama Connect offers a more straightforward setup process, while OpenText AccuRev's setup involves more complexity and time.
OpenText AccuRev Logo
TFS
4.0 out of 5
OpenText AccuRev Logo
TFS
4.0 out of 5
TFS offers integration with Microsoft services and strong project management tools, ideal for those in the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, OpenText AccuRev excels with advanced branching and workflow management, appealing to projects needing detailed version control despite higher initial costs.
Download OpenText AccuRev vs. TFS Report
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText AccuRev, providing a more budget-friendly option for startups, while OpenText AccuRev's higher initial investment might offer additional advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to OpenText AccuRev, providing a more budget-friendly option for startups, while OpenText AccuRev's higher initial investment might offer additional advanced features.
OpenText AccuRev Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
OpenText AccuRev Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
GoCD offers cost-effective continuous delivery and streamlined pipeline management. In comparison, OpenText AccuRev provides robust features for parallel development and advanced branching. GoCD suits organizations favoring ease of deployment, while AccuRev appeals to those prioritizing detailed guidance and complex requirements.
Download GoCD vs. OpenText AccuRev Report
GoCD offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial fees, while OpenText AccuRev presents higher setup costs. This price discrepancy highlights GoCD's affordability advantage compared to AccuRev's higher expense.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial fees, while OpenText AccuRev presents higher setup costs. This price discrepancy highlights GoCD's affordability advantage compared to AccuRev's higher expense.

Related categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Application Requirements Management
Test Management Tools