Planview AdaptiveWork Reviews

Name: Planview AdaptiveWork
Brand: Planview
Rating: 3.9 (8 reviews)

Vendor: Planview

3.9 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

What is Planview AdaptiveWork?

Planview AdaptiveWork enhances project and resource management through customizable reports and streamlined workflows. Offering transparency and time-saving benefits, it facilitates efficient decision-making with effective management of key metrics and visualizations.

Get the Planview AdaptiveWork Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Planview AdaptiveWork, Jira, monday.com and more!

Planview AdaptiveWork is the #23 ranked solution in top Project Management Software. PeerSpot users give Planview AdaptiveWork an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Planview AdaptiveWork is most commonly compared to Jira: Planview AdaptiveWork vs Jira. Planview AdaptiveWork is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 45% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 11% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Planview AdaptiveWork

April 2026

Get the report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Featured Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

VishalSingh11

Director BPM at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Compared to Broadcom Clarity, there was some flexibility with blueprints, etc. You can create a blueprint for different business groups or different customers. Planview AdaptiveWork doesn't have something like that. If they can build up something like a view price. It's still a traditional way where you have to create different instances for different customers. The PPM solution uses queries if I'm rolling out for different divisions. In that case, I have to create different instances for each region because each division may have a different look and feel. But if I have a blueprint, then it's very convenient. I can create multiple interfaces for different processes. Broadcom Clarity has some access control on those viewpoints.

Read full review

reviewer2383668

Product Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integration with other tools can sometimes be a hiccup, but this isn't necessarily a limitation of Planview AdaptiveWork. It's more often a result of company policies regarding integration with other systems and tools. From what I've gathered from discussions on various platforms, it appears that AdaptiveWork does integrate well with other tools. However, our experience is limited due to company policy restrictions. Some teams use it in agile settings. We follow the waterfall approach. I would recommend it, but users should ensure they strategically build out their workflows and logic. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

David Yau

Content Strategy Operstions Lead at Dell EMC

I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations. Slide publisher is something that we're definitely interested in, and it was great in theory, but when we put it to use, it didn't serve our needs. So we aren't using it currently. For the most part, I think the workflow management capabilities are sufficient based on what I've seen in my role as the team admin on some of the earlier teams that I've been on. However, there was difficulty updating the schedules on the fly without relining all the data. At Dell, we're always trying to match the project schedules to reality. So many of the dates start shifting, and people are getting frustrated with managing the schedule because the dates keep changing, and we have to keep fixing them. And I think that there are maybe too many dependencies added to the schedules that they've created. Some of the dependencies are needed because they have to hit a specific delivery date. So, it's kind of like, "Okay, if you don't use that, then technically you can push past that delivery date." So, they constantly have to shorten certain parts of the schedule to keep the dates from shifting. I think that was the biggest complaint in terms of the workflow piece. As far as automating life cycle service requests goes, we've done some configuration just in project intake. That was about as much automation as we've done. We've also used Clarizen to generate a schedule using certain templates on the due date and then backtrack. So yeah, we've done some automation on that. It wasn't easy to automate, though, because the project manager would still have to go in and do some updates and fixes every time, so it's never fully automated. I think it was always just semi-automated, and they still had to put in a decent amount of work to get the schedule correct.

Read full review

Planview AdaptiveWork mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of Planview AdaptiveWork in the Project Management Software category stands at 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview AdaptiveWork	1.5%
Jira	3.9%
monday.com	3.7%
Other	90.9%

Project Management Software

PeerResearch reports based on Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Project Management Software	May 9, 2026	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	May 9, 2026	Download
Comparison	Planview AdaptiveWork vs Jira	May 9, 2026	Download
Comparison	Planview AdaptiveWork vs monday.com	May 9, 2026	Download
Comparison	Planview AdaptiveWork vs Asana	May 9, 2026	Download

Valuable Features

Planview AdaptiveWork users emphasize visibility into employee utilization, project progress, and portfolio views. They value integration capabilities and report customization, aiding project overview and management. Features like Clarizen Slide Publisher enhance communication and save time, offering visual project summaries. Reporting, custom workflows, and collaboration tools are praised for automating tasks and improving productivity. Dashboard components provide visual metrics, and customizable workflow and actions improve project planning and management across teams.

"Clarizen's reporting features have been critical."
"Slide Publisher has been a lifesaver for us; it saves us five to 10 hours a week."
"I like the project management solution."

Room for Improvement

Planview AdaptiveWork needs better reporting, user adoption, and a friendlier interface as users find it overwhelming. Customization slows performance, especially over VPNs. Licensing is inflexible, making it costly for users needing only project overviews. Workflow features and slide publisher could improve usability. Schedule management struggles with dependencies. Automation is only semi-effective. The absence of a development environment for testing and flexible blueprints hinders accommodating different user preferences and access controls.

"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."
"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."
"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Planview AdaptiveWork for portfolio management and deliverable tracking across multiple projects. It functions as a repository for assets and metadata, enabling audits and campaign planning. Teams appreciate its flexibility, allowing adaptation for varied needs such as financial forecasting with custom rate cards. It supports project organization with individual and integrated views and facilitates project maintenance through customizable workflows. Planview AdaptiveWork is preferred for its configurability and adaptability beyond traditional project management.

Service and Support

Planview AdaptiveWork's customer service is praised for being responsive and direct. Users frequently contact tech support for functionality issues, which are swiftly addressed. Regular meetings are held to discuss new features, showcasing proactive engagement. The core team handles initial inquiries and escalates to tech support if necessary. Monthly user meetings are appreciated, enhancing communication and feedback. Most interactions highlight a commendable level of support, demonstrating effective problem resolution and engagement strategies.

Deployment

Initial setup experiences with Planview AdaptiveWork vary widely. Some users found it complex, taking two months, while others found it straightforward, integrating smoothly with existing systems like Outlook. The time for deployment ranged from two minutes to three months, often due to project specifics. Users emphasized a learning curve, but appreciated the accessible training resources and knowledge base provided. Adjusting the setup complexity is possible, depending on how extensively users employ the system's features.

Scalability

Planview AdaptiveWork is noted for its strong scalability, suitable for both medium and large enterprises. It supports thousands of users, though customization for large groups might enhance scalability. Companies value sticking with the established system due to the investment in user training. Some users emphasize the significant role of technical teams in maintaining and deploying it effectively, showcasing its ability to handle varying user needs within large organizations. Small businesses can also benefit, albeit with more limited usage.

Stability

Planview AdaptiveWork demonstrates stability with minimal issues reported over seven years. Users note a responsive team addressing any concerns within 24 to 48 hours. Stability ratings vary, with some assessing it as seven-point-five out of ten. Others rate it six or seven, suggesting occasional slowdowns and hiccups, particularly during peak usage times. The system generally functions reliably, with user engagement levels potentially affecting performance.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Planview AdaptiveWork Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

Legal Firm

Marketing Services Firm

University

Religious Institution

Non Profit

Educational Organization

Wholesaler/Distributor

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Insurance Company

Retailer

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Non Tech Company

Consumer Goods Company

Logistics Company

Hospitality Company

Leisure / Travel Company

Engineering Company

Wellness & Fitness Company

Museum Or Institution

Compare Planview AdaptiveWork with alternative products

Learn more about Planview AdaptiveWork

Planview AdaptiveWork is sought after for its comprehensive project and resource management capabilities, offering detailed portfolio visibility and employee utilization tracking. Organizations find value in its reporting features, including customizable dashboards and the Slide Publisher, which streamline presentations and enhance transparency. Automated workflows and collaboration tools reduce manual effort, boosting productivity. However, it lacks the flexibility of competitors like Broadcom Clarity, particularly in catering to diverse business needs. Some users find the interface less intuitive and certain features, such as schedule management and partial automation, pose challenges.

What are the main features of Planview AdaptiveWork?

Project and Resource Management: Enables effective tracking and utilization.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances insight and transparency in reporting.
Slide Publisher: Simplifies the creation of presentation assets.
Automated Workflows: Increases efficiency by reducing manual tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with other tools to streamline operations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Decision-Making: Efficiently manages key metrics and visualizations.
Time Savings: Automated features reduce the time spent on routine tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better teamwork through integrated tools.
Transparency: Offers comprehensive views of project portfolios and resources.
Adaptability: Serves various team needs beyond project management.

Planview AdaptiveWork is implemented in sectors focusing on program and portfolio management, proving essential in tracking timesheets and finances with multiple rate cards. It integrates financial data into project plans for accurate forecasting and supports teams with custom workflows for ongoing maintenance. Additionally, it adapts to deliverable tracking and reporting, serving as a robust content repository or library, catering to diverse team requirements in industries beyond conventional project management.

Planview AdaptiveWork was previously known as Planview Clarizen.

Planview AdaptiveWork customers

Cisco Capital, JLL, Conagra Brands, Cargill, JLL, IBM, IIROC, Siemens Energy

Product Categories

Project Management Software

Popular Comparisons

Jira vs Planview AdaptiveWork

monday.com vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Asana vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Adobe Workfront vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Microsoft Project vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Wrike vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Smartsheet vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Trello vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Sciforma vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Planview ProjectPlace vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Basecamp vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Teamwork vs Planview AdaptiveWork

KeyedIn Projects vs Planview AdaptiveWork

See all alternatives

Planview AdaptiveWork Reviews Summary
Author info	Rating	Review Summary
Director BPM at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees	3.5	I find Planview AdaptiveWork beneficial for managing projects and finances, offering features like rate cards. However, it lacks blueprint flexibility seen in Broadcom Clarity, requiring separate instances for different customers, which could be improved.
Product Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees	4.0	Planview AdaptiveWork helps us organize projects across multiple teams with customizable workflows for better project planning. It enhances collaboration and decision-making but could benefit from a development environment for testing. It's more robust than Asana for detailed projects.
Content Strategy Operstions Lead at Dell EMC	4.0	I primarily use Clarizen as a flexible content library for asset tracking, leveraging its strong reporting and customizable workflows. Although an excellent partner, I find the slide publisher isn't user-friendly, and schedule updates can be challenging due to dependencies.
Cybersecurity Program Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 5,001-10,000 employees	4.0	I use Clarizen for program and portfolio management, valuing its report customization and Slide Publisher for transparency. However, I find its visual aesthetic lacking, and extensive customization can slow it down. The licensing structure and workflow also need improvement.
Information Technology Service Delivery Consultant \| Senior Project Program Manager at a tech services company with 1-10 employees	3.5	I like Clarizen as a stable, scalable project management solution for non-IT. However, I find it overwhelming and complex to set up, needing more user-friendliness. Overall, I rate it a seven.
Project Manager at a mining and metals company		No summary available
IT Administrator at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees	4.0	No summary available
Partner with 51-200 employees	4.0	I value the visibility provided into employee utilization, project progress, and program portfolios, with promising integration capabilities. However, I've struggled with reporting, user adoption, and its less graphical interface.

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Jira	4.1	3.9%	91%	281 interviews Add to research
monday.com	4.7	3.7%	98%	239 interviews Add to research

Planview AdaptiveWork Reviews

What is Planview AdaptiveWork?

Featured Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

Planview AdaptiveWork mindshare

PeerResearch reports based on Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

Compare Planview AdaptiveWork with alternative products

Learn more about Planview AdaptiveWork

Planview AdaptiveWork customers

Related questions

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons