Adobe Workfront vs Planview AdaptiveWork comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adobe and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Adobe is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Planview is ranked #22. Adobe holds a 1.8% mindshare in PMS, compared to Planview’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 42 Adobe Workfront reviews

6,442 Views
4,252 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Planview AdaptiveWork

Read 8 Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

3,055 Views
2,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Planview AdaptiveWork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Adobe Workfront and Planview AdaptiveWork are project management tools competing in productivity and collaboration enhancement. Adobe Workfront seems to have the upper hand with its flexibility and comprehensive integration capabilities, making it suitable for creative environments.

Features: Adobe Workfront features comprehensive project tracking, seamless integration with Adobe products, and dynamic workflow support. Planview AdaptiveWork offers robust resource management, strategic planning, and enhanced forecasting tools.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve in strategic planning depth, resource management, and cost transparency. Planview AdaptiveWork may need enhancements in flexibility, creative workflow integration, and user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive customer support. Planview AdaptiveWork offers a thorough initial setup due to extensive configuration options, with customer service focused on detailed configuration guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront's competitive pricing accommodates scalable team sizes, offering reasonable ROI through integration capabilities. Planview AdaptiveWork may involve higher initial costs reflecting its advanced features, providing greater long-term benefits for organizations prioritizing strategic planning.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Planview AdaptiveWork

Ranking in Project Management Software

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 1.8%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AdaptiveWork is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Adobe Workfront	1.8%
Planview AdaptiveWork	1.4%
Other	96.8%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

AdityaGupta1

Adobe Workfront Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Have faced limitations in functionality and dependability while trying to streamline project management workflows

One of the best things about Adobe Workfront is that we can immediately track each project. We can keep track of all tasks with the help of milestones that we can add to a project. We can monitor everything effectively. The utilization and workload balancer allows us to clearly see if a person is over-utilized or if they are not getting utilized to at least 80 or 90%. This enables better tracking and work assignment with improved clarity. We use custom dashboards in Adobe Workfront to see all statuses. The integration capabilities with other software are quite good, with straightforward connectivity. We have HTTP connectors if we need to connect with external systems via APIs. If we have any API endpoint for any external tool, we can connect it with Adobe Workfront using Fusion. Reporting is a major part of Adobe Workfront, making it not just a workflow management tool but also a tool where we can get data and present it to executives through comprehensive reporting.

Read full review

VishalSingh11

Director BPM at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has resources management and timesheets but could be more flexible

Compared to Broadcom Clarity, there was some flexibility with blueprints, etc. You can create a blueprint for different business groups or different customers. Planview AdaptiveWork doesn't have something like that. If they can build up something like a view price. It's still a traditional way where you have to create different instances for different customers. The PPM solution uses queries if I'm rolling out for different divisions. In that case, I have to create different instances for each region because each division may have a different look and feel. But if I have a blueprint, then it's very convenient. I can create multiple interfaces for different processes. Broadcom Clarity has some access control on those viewpoints.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were able to combine Project Management, Help Desk ticket handling, Time Reporting and now we have everything in one place."

"As per a user survey, 90% of respondents believe that Workfront has increased operational discipline."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"We had a 6 month ROI."

"The solution is stable."

"The project transparency in AtTask/WorkFront is amazing, it helped us become so much more organized and gives us so much data to help report in ways it would have taken me weeks to do, and now I can build the report fast and have it at my fingertips to use at any time."

"The features of Adobe Workfront that I have found the most valuable so far are the data gathering capabilities through the custom forms, especially when you're in an industry where everything is so tightly monitored and audited."

"The best features in Adobe Workfront from my perspective are the project management and automation from the back end, the tool called Workfront Fusion where we can automate processes."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"Clarizen Slide Publisher has helped increase transparency and communication with project stakeholders for us."

"I like the project management solution. It's really nice."

"Provides visibility into employee utilization, progress on specific client projects and a portfolio view of all programs."

"The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaboration feature enhances our team's productivity by allowing individuals to see the impact of their decisions on projects owned and managed by other teams."

"Clarizen's strength is reporting. Aside from reporting, I also like the ability to create customized workflow and custom actions. The workflow rules are handy. For example, you can create custom fields and dependent picklists."

"Slide Publisher has been a lifesaver for us; it saves us five to 10 hours a week."

"Clarizen's reporting features have been critical."

Cons

"Improving the efficiency of converting issues to projects is also essential; when converting issues to projects, users should remain on the same page rather than being redirected."

"Some of my reporting needs, I have had to add custom calculations and when I have called to get help, they say it is a custom ask."

"Rather complex. Too many ways to get to the same result."

"It's not as robust as SharePoint 2013 with Project Server/Web Apps."

"Some of the specific functions in the system can get a little quirky and could use some help, but those are really for unique cases and not general system functionality."

"Reporting using charts could be improved - I currently export a few complex reports to Excel in order to create the charts that I need."

"Lots of bugs with AtTask. I had to call Help line A LOT for help."

"More customization of the user interface would be nice."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get really slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

"One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data."

"Have struggled with reporting and user adoption."

"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses. The ultimate plan includes Fusion, which is an excellent automation tool. In...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

The platform could benefit from additional customization features. The external lookup field, which allows custom API calls to fill data, is limited to two thousand results, which is insufficient f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workfront?

We specifically implement Adobe Workfront for other clients as Deloitte is a partner of Adobe. We work with different clients to implement Workfront and streamline marketing resource management wit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 6% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 4% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 7% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 6% of the time

Asana vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Semantic Space Technologies PPM Studio vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview AdaptiveWork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

September 2026

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview AdaptiveWork

September 2026

Download Planview AdaptiveWork product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

Planview Clarizen

Overview

Adobe Workfront provides customizable tools for project management, including dashboards and reports, promoting efficient workflows and team collaboration.

Adobe Workfront supports organizations with features like real-time data access, creative tool integration, and automated processes. It facilitates resource allocation and project tracking with role-based access control, making it a versatile platform for diverse methodologies. While its interface is user-friendly, some areas like reporting and custom fields could use simplification and faster system scalability.

What are Adobe Workfront's key features?

Customizable dashboards and reports: Facilitate data-driven decision-making with personalized insights.
Workflows and automation capabilities: Streamline processes and enhance productivity with Fusion.
Integration with creative tools: Seamlessly connect with CRM and DAM for synchronized operations.
Secure role-based access: Protect sensitive data while ensuring appropriate access levels.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from Adobe Workfront?

Improved project efficiency: Optimize resource planning and task management.
Enhanced collaboration: Ensure smooth communication within distributed teams.
Centralized project tracking: Maintain clear visibility on campaign progress and performance.
Streamlined approval processes: Reduce bottlenecks with automated workflows.

In marketing, Adobe Workfront is implemented for managing project timelines and resources, integrating with CRM and DAM tools. Companies streamline workflows to improve campaign planning and performance. By utilizing agile methodologies, they maintain a centralized hub for tracking and collaboration, enabling more efficient project completion.

Adobe

Planview AdaptiveWork enhances project and resource management through customizable reports and streamlined workflows. Offering transparency and time-saving benefits, it facilitates efficient decision-making with effective management of key metrics and visualizations.

Planview AdaptiveWork is sought after for its comprehensive project and resource management capabilities, offering detailed portfolio visibility and employee utilization tracking. Organizations find value in its reporting features, including customizable dashboards and the Slide Publisher, which streamline presentations and enhance transparency. Automated workflows and collaboration tools reduce manual effort, boosting productivity. However, it lacks the flexibility of competitors like Broadcom Clarity, particularly in catering to diverse business needs. Some users find the interface less intuitive and certain features, such as schedule management and partial automation, pose challenges.

What are the main features of Planview AdaptiveWork?

Project and Resource Management: Enables effective tracking and utilization.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances insight and transparency in reporting.
Slide Publisher: Simplifies the creation of presentation assets.
Automated Workflows: Increases efficiency by reducing manual tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with other tools to streamline operations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Decision-Making: Efficiently manages key metrics and visualizations.
Time Savings: Automated features reduce the time spent on routine tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better teamwork through integrated tools.
Transparency: Offers comprehensive views of project portfolios and resources.
Adaptability: Serves various team needs beyond project management.

Planview AdaptiveWork is implemented in sectors focusing on program and portfolio management, proving essential in tracking timesheets and finances with multiple rate cards. It integrates financial data into project plans for accurate forecasting and supports teams with custom workflows for ongoing maintenance. Additionally, it adapts to deliverable tracking and reporting, serving as a robust content repository or library, catering to diverse team requirements in industries beyond conventional project management.

Planview

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Cisco Capital, JLL, Conagra Brands, Cargill, JLL, IBM, IIROC, Siemens Energy

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

September 2026

Free Report: Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.