QlikView Reviews

Determining ROI from QlikView is complex and varies; some entities report significant time savings and improved business processes. ROI ranges from quick returns in less than a year to longer estimations exceeding five years. Although exact figures are elusive, users recoup costs and achieve substantial insights by transitioning from traditional methods, like Excel, enabling quicker decision-making and strategic management. Despite pricing concerns and licensing complexities, adaptability and acceptance are noted benefits when utilising QlikView.

Enterprise users reported that QlikView pricing tends to be high, especially for server licenses and large user bases. Costs include an initial fee around $25,000 plus 20% annual maintenance. User license types vary: Named User or Document licenses, with costs from $500 to $1,500 each. While the licensing is considered competitive in the market, it can become costly as usage expands. Negotiating with Qlik and understanding the appropriate licensing model is crucial for managing expenses.

• "The platform's pricing is considered quite expensive, particularly given the dollar-based pricing."
• "My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."
• "QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

Organizations primarily utilize QlikView for analytics, dashboard creation, and reporting. Sales teams leverage it for real-time inventory and profitability insights. It's deployed in various sectors such as financial maintenance, healthcare, and manufacturing for data visualization and business intelligence. It facilitates data integration from multiple sources, enhances decision-making through interactive visualizations, and aids in operations, forecasting, and strategic planning. Users appreciate its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration with existing databases.

QlikView's customer service receives high marks for responsiveness and efficiency, with many users praising strong community interactions that facilitate issue resolution. Technical support is frequently described as excellent, often provided by partners or local resellers, and is known for quick response times, though some indicate a need for improvement in prioritizing critical issues. The active user community is recognized as a valuable resource for technical assistance.

Users found QlikView's initial setup to be mostly straightforward and simple. Installation requires minimal expertise, particularly for desktop versions. Server installations may need more technical knowledge. Some users mentioned potential complexities, especially with larger or integrated systems. Most agree that proper planning and understanding of specific needs are crucial. Technical support and documentation are often helpful, making the process manageable. Initial deployments are quick, and experienced teams can handle it effectively.

QlikView's scalability varies depending on hardware and data size. High RAM usage is common, especially with many users or complex data models. Some experience no issues, while others require server upgrades for optimal performance. It's memory-intensive, making hardware consideration crucial. Larger datasets may slow performance. Companies report successful scaling with careful planning and resource investment, though some prefer Qlik Sense for better scalability. Ratings on scalability range from good to excellent, though experiences can differ.

QlikView is regarded as highly stable by users, with few reports of performance issues linked to infrastructure or large data loads. Many praise its reliability, rating stability between eight and ten out of ten. Users have encountered minimal glitches, though occasional resource-intensive tasks may cause slowdowns. QlikView excels in in-memory data handling, standing out compared to competitors, but stability can be affected during usage peaks if hardware requirements are not met.