I'm using it for micro-segmentation-based campaigns and inbound and outbound campaigns.
I'm using its latest on-prem version.
SAS Marketing Automation efficiently empowers organizations to streamline their marketing campaigns, ensuring refined strategy execution and optimized customer interactions.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SAS Marketing Automation | 1.3% |
| Salesforce Marketing Cloud | 11.6% |
| Marketo | 9.3% |
| Other | 77.8% |
SAS Marketing Automation stands out by providing marketers with advanced tools to tailor customer engagements efficiently. It utilizes data-driven insights to enhance marketing strategies, improve responsiveness, and increase campaign effectiveness. With intuitive analytics, marketers can segment audiences, identify key trends, and adapt to market demands in real-time. This results in more targeted campaigns and a higher return on marketing investments.
What are the most important features of SAS Marketing Automation?SAS Marketing Automation finds its application in sectors like retail, finance, and healthcare where personalized marketing is crucial. In retail, it facilitates customer journey mapping, boosting sales. In finance, it enhances client acquisition through targeted offers, while in healthcare, it improves patient outreach and education.
SAS Marketing Automation was previously known as SAS Campaign Management.
Staples
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Solution Architecht at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I'm using SAS Marketing Automation for micro-segmentation and inbound/outbound campaigns. It allows non-technical users self-service capabilities after setup. While highly customizable, it lacks out-of-the-box features needed by marketing teams. I've explored Adobe, Salesforce, and IBM alternatives. |
| Senior Data Manager at Liberty Seguros, Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A. | 4.0 | I use SAS Marketing Automation for data analysis, finding its interface user-friendly with strong reporting. My main concern is the need for expensive integration connectors. Setup can be complex, yet it's stable. I rated it 8/10. |
I'm using it for micro-segmentation-based campaigns and inbound and outbound campaigns.
I'm using its latest on-prem version.
You can enable it for business users or marketing users to use it in a self-service way. So, the technical team is needed to build the features or processes, and then those processes can be used in a self-service way by your non-technical users. Essentially, I'm from the technical side. I'm from the enablement team. The core thing is whenever you make a marketing process related to an inbound or outbound campaign available, the business users or marketing users can use it in a self-service way.
The product is highly customizable, but the marketing and business teams want a lot of things to be built out of the box. A lot of features that could be out of the box aren't there. The main concern is to keep the system in such a way that it provides you with some out-of-the-box features and some customizable features as well. An example would be stratification or stratified sampling of customers. It's something that is not part of the product. It's something I have built using this product. If something like this is available out of the box as part of the product, you don't have to particularly manage that.
For the outbound campaigns, there should be dynamic offer or treatment assignments.
I've been using this solution for about eight years.
I'd rate it a six out of ten because it's a complex solution. There are many parameters, and you have to see many things. Its stability depends on the usage and many other factors. It's a process.
There are about fifty users with different kinds of usage. Its users include developers, designers, business users, operations users, and administrations. All of them use this.
I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of scalability.
They are fine. I'd rate them a seven out of ten.
Neutral
I've not used any similar product.
It's complex. It cannot be easily deployed. You need to have your vendor team onboard. It's a distributed system based. It's not a simple process. It's a very complicated process. It takes a few days. The installation might not take long, but there are other things, such as configuration, migration, etc.
We implemented it in collaboration with the vendor. For maintenance, we have a team of five to six people from the administration and operations teams.
I'm not aware of the full cost. The financials are not with me. In terms of additional costs, there are always OpEx and CapEx. That's one way to look at it. You also need separate hardware to deploy the product.
I've looked into various solutions. There are solutions by Adobe, Salesforce, and probably IBM.
I'd recommend it depending on the use case. If you need an on-prem solution, this is probably the one. It depends on how you want to use it. If you need to have a hybrid environment of separate technical users or enablers and separate business users, this is a good product because some of the products can't be used by non-technical users. The learning curve for non-technical users might be more. Even this would require some level of technical expertise for sure.
Overall, I'd rate it a seven out of ten.

SAS Marketing Automation is a data analytics platform. I have a data analytics background, and this is my actual role. SAS has a lot of capacities to work with massive amounts of data.
SAP Marketing Automation is user-friendly. The interface is nice and clear. You can see the different diagrams and define various filters and targets. You can also export the customer information you collect to make the campaign.
It's easy to understand how this information is entered. There are also a lot of platforms that show the results of campaigns. You can customize your data and define different reports, but SAS also provides a standard report.
You need to buy connectors to integrate Marketing Automation with various suppliers. For example, if I want to see the data through Power BI, I need a connector to see the data directly. Otherwise, you need to do everything manually. You have to download information from SAS and then save a text file, and then I can import it into Power BI. I would like Marketing Automation to have this native functionality without the need to pay more for connectors.
I've been working with SAS Marketing Automation as a marketing user for eight years. In the past two or three years, I've been an implementation consultant working with people from SAS and clients. I work with the IT team and users at client companies as a consultant.
Sometimes SAS Marketing Automation has bugs, but the last time it happened was years ago.
Setting up SAS Marketing Automation can be complex for big projects because it involves a lot of people across multiple teams, like IT, architecture, and privacy. We need to verify if the project is in compliance with the DPO, and the IT security team must ensure that the servers are okay and the data is locked down. In maybe three or four months, we can do these kinds of projects better, but many people to verify that everything is okay.
We work closely with the team in Spain, and we have been considering whether to switch platforms. In the past few weeks, we have been comparing SAS to other vendors. The solutions are very similar on paper, but I think the price of Marketing Automation is better. It's not easy because they are very similar.
If we consult the Gartner diagram, SAS and Salesforce are very close. They are similar from a marketing point of view, but I think the IT department prefers SAS. The version that we are using now is a bit outdated, so we want to upgrade to a new version of SAS or switch to another vendor.
I rate SAS Marketing Automation eight out of 10.