Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is SnapLogic?

Featured SnapLogic reviews

SnapLogic mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of SnapLogic in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category stands at 3.0%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SnapLogic3.0%
Boomi iPaaS8.6%
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps7.2%
Other81.2%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

PeerResearch reports based on SnapLogic reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntegration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)Jan 26, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 26, 2026Download
ComparisonSnapLogic vs Microsoft Azure Logic AppsJan 26, 2026Download
ComparisonSnapLogic vs MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformJan 26, 2026Download
ComparisonSnapLogic vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)Jan 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)4.05.2%92%214 interviewsAdd to research
Camunda4.1N/A89%78 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 21, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business83
Midsize Enterprise64
Large Enterprise381
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
University
5%
Retailer
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Non Profit
2%
Media Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Government
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Agriculture
1%
 
SnapLogic Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Specialist App Development at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.4.0I've used SnapLogic for over three years and found it user-friendly, scalable, and effective for integrating systems and automating processes, though some connectors need improvement. It's evolving into AI and API capabilities, which is promising for future use.
Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5I've used SnapLogic to streamline data integrations with its low-code, drag-and-drop tools, improving efficiency and reducing development time, though better documentation and debugging could help; overall, it's stable, scalable, and delivers solid ROI.
Head of Data Practice at a tech consulting company with 201-500 employees4.5I primarily use SnapLogic for data integration and some API tasks. I value its reusability and pre-delivered snaps, alongside its effective process control. Compared to MuleSoft, SnapLogic is cheaper and simpler, with responsive support for additional features.
Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees4.5I use SnapLogic for data migration and integration, especially with SAP data, due to its user-friendly interface. While it excels in agility, improving AI capabilities would enhance usability. For enterprise projects, I still prefer DBT.
Architect at VTR4.5As a solution architect, I recommended SnapLogic for its efficient connectors and quick data handling, although its limited connector variety and lack of customization present challenges for complex integrations. Despite some limitations, it proved effective for simpler, rapid setups.
Integration developer at Blackwoods2.5I found SnapLogic user-friendly and easier to debug than Boomi, but it lacks comprehensive solutions. The support needs improvement, especially in technical knowledge. While it's a cost-effective option for basic cloud integration, I prefer Boomi for more complex tasks.
Solution Architect at X-Press Feeders1.0We used SnapLogic for building an EDI pipeline for integration, converting EDI to JSON in our company. Despite its utility, SnapLogic requires setup changes for new EDI versions. Previously, we used MapForce and briefly considered Jitterbit before developing an internal tool.
Senior Software Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available