Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Tricentis NeoLoad Logo

Tricentis NeoLoad Reviews

Vendor: Tricentis
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Tricentis NeoLoad?

Featured Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

Tricentis NeoLoad mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 15.7%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad15.7%
Apache JMeter19.1%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)14.8%
Other50.400000000000006%
Performance Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPerformance Testing ToolsAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonTricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeterAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonTricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeterAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonTricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)Aug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Apache JMeter3.919.1%87%94 interviewsAdd to research
BlazeMeter4.110.5%94%49 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise45
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business181
Midsize Enterprise113
Large Enterprise657
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Construction Company
4%
University
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Non Profit
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Tricentis NeoLoad with alternative products

Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad

Tricentis NeoLoad customers

Related questions

 
Tricentis NeoLoad Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
senior test engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5I used Tricentis NeoLoad for two years and found it easy to set up with good metrics and scalability, though pricing, forced upgrades, and compatibility issues were drawbacks. Support was satisfactory during our implementation and use.
Performance.Test.Consulting at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees4.0I use Tricentis NeoLoad for continuous performance validation, integrating it into pipelines for real-time feedback. Its reporting features are excellent, but recent licensing changes make it less attractive for smaller companies compared to competitors like JMeter.
Technical lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Tricentis NeoLoad for web and SAP protocols due to its ease of use and speed in handling complex scripting, faster than competitors. It integrates with Jenkins and Dynatrace. Improvement is needed for collaborative script access.
SME (Subject Matter Expert) at Maersk4.5I used Tricentis NeoLoad for S/4HANA projects to evaluate performance, valuing its ease of use and Tosca integration for efficient testing. While needing better support during setup, its reusability and low learning curve made it favorable over alternatives.
Senior Consultant at Capgemini4.5Tricentis NeoLoad's standout feature for us is its ability to monitor load generators and configure dynamics effortlessly, improving our application performance testing. With a user-friendly interface and seamless CI/CD integration, it simplifies the testing process significantly.
Practice Manager - Digital Assurance - Performance, Resiliency & Cloud Testing at Hexaware Technologies Limited4.5At our company, we use Tricentis NeoLoad primarily for performance testing, valuing its intuitive UI, low-code features, and robust reporting. While migration required effort, it delivered substantial ROI compared to OpenText LoadRunner despite needing improved integration for its mobile platform.
Team Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees4.5I used NeoLoad for an Agile project and found its request handling impressive compared to JMeter, as it simplifies maintenance and saves time. However, I would like more information on its DevOps integration capabilities for CI/CD pipelines.
Principal Software Engineer at One Advanced5.0I've used NeoLoad primarily on-premise, managing up to 8,000 virtual users. I appreciate its UI, comparison reports, and customization options. Post-Tricentis integration, support needs improvement. I also use StresStimulus, but NeoLoad excels with Oracle forms.