Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Oracle and Tricentis are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #13, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 2.9% mindshare in PTT, compared to Tricentis’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

2,360 Views
684 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis NeoLoad

Read 66 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

5,592 Views
4,306 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Tricentis NeoLoad

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Tricentis NeoLoad are both in the realm of application testing solutions, addressing various user needs. Based on data comparisons, Tricentis NeoLoad holds the upper hand with its advanced performance testing and reporting capabilities, despite higher perceived costs.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers recorded scripting automation, stable support for Oracle EBS Applications, and integration with Oracle products through features like Open Script and Oracle Test Manager. Tricentis NeoLoad provides excellent load test execution, easy scripting, CI/CD integration, robust scaling, and results reporting.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite needs better cross-browser compatibility, desktop application support, and flexible script reuse. Tricentis NeoLoad could improve its third-party tool integration, expand protocol support, and provide more comprehensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with responsive technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad provides public and private cloud options, with proactive technical support and suggestions for improved customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is known for competitive pricing and accessible licensing, delivering strong ROI when used in Oracle environments. Tricentis NeoLoad, while less economical, offers a flexible licensing model and is regarded as cost-effective against high-end options like LoadRunner, with a positive ROI due to its scalability and integration features.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th)

Tricentis NeoLoad

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad is 10.7%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad	10.7%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.9%
Other	86.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

reviewer2732589

senior test engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Positive experience with seamless setup and responsive support but pricing and version compatibility need improvement

I'm not ready to share what areas of Tricentis NeoLoad have room for improvement now. The price could be more friendly, and it was impossible to continue using the same version of Tricentis NeoLoad, as we were forced to move to the next version. Sometimes there were compatibility problems, and that was a major problem with backward compatibility issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has allowed more thorough testing with performance-based testing, in addition to regression testing and regular testing with each software release."

"Now I feel its the best tool to automate any of the Oracle Products, which include Oracle EBS Applications, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, Adobe Flex, ADF applications, etc.."

"For a few years, OATS was the only tool that allowed us to load test our Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) with Siebel."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"Compared to support at our previous product, they're more responsive and they're more knowledgeable."

"NeoLoad is more user-friendly than HPE LoadRunner."

"NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."

"If I have to create a script in LoadRunner, it usually takes around six hours, but if I do the same thing in Neotys, it usually takes around one and a half hours to complete everything."

"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."

"The GUI based scripting is a huge time saver for us since we don’t have a dedicated performance team yet, as I can create scripts quickly and get tests going."

"I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools."

"I particularly like Neoload’s ease of use, built in monitoring and their extensive library of wireless devices and protocols."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pros

Cons

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"It does not provide easy diagnostics to ascertain end to end transaction monitoring."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"Almost everything about NewLoad looks good, but I would like to have an indication of the variables for error messages appearing in the error tab."

"The ability to show transactions per second during the test run is missing; currently, we have to eyeball the TPS using the graph."

"The UI lacks sufficient object rendering."

"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols."

"It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be."

"It's straightforward to install and configure, but complex to convert scripts from a previous product to work in NeoLoad."

"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."

"Analysis can be further improved. I have been using LoadRunner analysis and it has been a very powerful tool."

More Tricentis NeoLoad cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate Tricentis NeoLoad's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."

"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools."

"From a licensing cost perspective, I rate the product an eight out of ten since it is a cheap solution that looks costly for certain areas."

"NeoLoad now has a much more flexible licensing process."

"NeoLoad is expensive, but to my knowledge, it's better than LoadRunner."

"The licensing for this solution is renewable yearly, and covers all available features and technical support."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?

I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?

My relationship with Tricentis NeoLoad is that I implemented it during a trial period, and then they implemented some solution on the basis of Tricentis NeoLoad. We tested both virtual infrastructu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis NeoLoad?

The most valuable feature of Tricentis NeoLoad for us has been its ability to easily monitor all the load generators and configure the dynamics and data rates. Additionally, we can monitor individu...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 33% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 9% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Flood vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis NeoLoad Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis NeoLoad

April 2026

Download Tricentis NeoLoad product report

Also Known As

OATS

NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.

Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.

What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?

Team Collaboration: Enables simultaneous work across different locations.
Comprehensive Insights: Custom graph options for detailed analysis.
User-Centric Design: Simplifies scripting without extensive coding knowledge.
Protocol Support: Facilitates mobile, web, and cloud-based testing.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Jenkins, Tableau, and others.
Scalability and Monitoring: Supports real-time monitoring and API integration.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: More affordable than some competitors while offering scalable solutions.
Improved Testing Accuracy: Real-world simulation of multi-user scenarios.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports both on-premise and SaaS models.
Enhanced Application Performance: Monitors system behavior effectively.

Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

April 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.