Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Oracle and Tricentis are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #14, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 2.7% mindshare in PTT, compared to Tricentis’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

2,982 Views
835 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis NeoLoad

Read 68 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

6,888 Views
5,510 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Tricentis NeoLoad

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Tricentis NeoLoad are both in the realm of application testing solutions, addressing various user needs. Based on data comparisons, Tricentis NeoLoad holds the upper hand with its advanced performance testing and reporting capabilities, despite higher perceived costs.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers recorded scripting automation, stable support for Oracle EBS Applications, and integration with Oracle products through features like Open Script and Oracle Test Manager. Tricentis NeoLoad provides excellent load test execution, easy scripting, CI/CD integration, robust scaling, and results reporting.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite needs better cross-browser compatibility, desktop application support, and flexible script reuse. Tricentis NeoLoad could improve its third-party tool integration, expand protocol support, and provide more comprehensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with responsive technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad provides public and private cloud options, with proactive technical support and suggestions for improved customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is known for competitive pricing and accessible licensing, delivering strong ROI when used in Oracle environments. Tricentis NeoLoad, while less economical, offers a flexible licensing model and is regarded as cost-effective against high-end options like LoadRunner, with a positive ROI due to its scalability and integration features.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (26th)

Tricentis NeoLoad

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad is 12.5%, down from 15.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad	12.5%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.7%
Other	84.8%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

AnantJoshi

Senior Director Intelligent Automation at Truglobal

Performance testing has delivered diverse global retail loads and generates clear diagnostic reports

I did not notice any weak points or downsides in Tricentis NeoLoad except for the cost. Everything else is good with the tool. When I consider that service customers have to pay the cost for the load generation, I find that the cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"I can organize test scripts pretty well."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"My advice to others is if they are using any Oracle Cloud Fusion-based or on-premise-based application, this is a good solution to use."

"OATS provides the functionality to institute a corporate-wide standardized method and approach for all types of application testing."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The function test feature is valuable."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"It’s a very powerful tool which meets all our load and performance testing requirements, along with very sophisticated monitoring tools and reports."

"I would strongly recommend this tool highly."

"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."

"The pros outweigh the cons and so NeoLoad is highly recommended over its competitors."

"To give perspective, we went from spending three million dollars to 160 thousand dollars, which is a huge saving and good value."

"The reporting features are great."

"It's user-friendly, and everything is handy, with scripting load testing and everything in a single tool."

"The most valuable feature of Tricentis NeoLoad for us has been its ability to easily monitor all the load generators and configure the dynamics and data rates. Additionally, we can monitor individual loads and data directly within NeoLoad without needing third-party tools."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pros

Cons

"Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"WebForms works fine, but scripting in the EBS forms option isn't very consistent and stable."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"I would rate their technical support 2.5 out of ten."

"OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so."

"Performance is slow as compared to other tools like QTP."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"A small number of times, when load testing huge projects with huge number (~10,000) of vUsers, we have seen that it completely froze."

"It needs improvement with post-production."

"We purchased a two-year license but broke the contract after 18 months."

"It's straightforward to install and configure, but complex to convert scripts from a previous product to work in NeoLoad."

"If one person opens any script, another person won't be able to work on it simultaneously. If they can improve that feature, it would be helpful for everyone. I found that incorporating all the scripts into a single project was the challenging part. This is because we are working on different domains—I'm on one domain, and others are on another. We need to handle all these scripts cautiously."

"It would be nice if this could be cheaper."

"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the range of codeless scripting such as with terminal emulation apps."

"Almost everything about NewLoad looks good, but I would like to have an indication of the variables for error messages appearing in the error tab."

More Tricentis NeoLoad cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."

"The licensing for this solution is renewable yearly, and covers all available features and technical support."

"The tool is not cheap."

"From a licensing cost perspective, I rate the product an eight out of ten since it is a cheap solution that looks costly for certain areas."

"The solution requires an annual license."

"Tricentis NeoLoad is much cheaper compared to other tools like LoadRunner."

"It is cheaper than other solutions."

"I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of pricing"

More Tricentis NeoLoad pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?

I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?

Tricentis NeoLoad use cases were for retail, specifically a US based retail customer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis NeoLoad?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 44% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 5% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis NeoLoad Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

July 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis NeoLoad

July 2026

Download Tricentis NeoLoad product report

Also Known As

OATS

NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.

Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.

What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?

Team Collaboration: Enables simultaneous work across different locations.
Comprehensive Insights: Custom graph options for detailed analysis.
User-Centric Design: Simplifies scripting without extensive coding knowledge.
Protocol Support: Facilitates mobile, web, and cloud-based testing.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Jenkins, Tableau, and others.
Scalability and Monitoring: Supports real-time monitoring and API integration.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: More affordable than some competitors while offering scalable solutions.
Improved Testing Accuracy: Real-world simulation of multi-user scenarios.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports both on-premise and SaaS models.
Enhanced Application Performance: Monitors system behavior effectively.

Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

August 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.