Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Oracle and Tricentis are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #14, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 2.6% mindshare in PTT, compared to Tricentis’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

3,242 Views
875 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis NeoLoad

Read 68 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

7,479 Views
6,058 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Tricentis NeoLoad

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Tricentis NeoLoad are both in the realm of application testing solutions, addressing various user needs. Based on data comparisons, Tricentis NeoLoad holds the upper hand with its advanced performance testing and reporting capabilities, despite higher perceived costs.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers recorded scripting automation, stable support for Oracle EBS Applications, and integration with Oracle products through features like Open Script and Oracle Test Manager. Tricentis NeoLoad provides excellent load test execution, easy scripting, CI/CD integration, robust scaling, and results reporting.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite needs better cross-browser compatibility, desktop application support, and flexible script reuse. Tricentis NeoLoad could improve its third-party tool integration, expand protocol support, and provide more comprehensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with responsive technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad provides public and private cloud options, with proactive technical support and suggestions for improved customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is known for competitive pricing and accessible licensing, delivering strong ROI when used in Oracle environments. Tricentis NeoLoad, while less economical, offers a flexible licensing model and is regarded as cost-effective against high-end options like LoadRunner, with a positive ROI due to its scalability and integration features.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (27th)

Tricentis NeoLoad

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad is 13.0%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad	13.0%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.6%
Other	84.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

AnantJoshi

Senior Director Intelligent Automation at Truglobal

Performance testing has delivered diverse global retail loads and generates clear diagnostic reports

I did not notice any weak points or downsides in Tricentis NeoLoad except for the cost. Everything else is good with the tool. When I consider that service customers have to pay the cost for the load generation, I find that the cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My advice to others is if they are using any Oracle Cloud Fusion-based or on-premise-based application, this is a good solution to use."

"Helps us to reduce the workload to check the system."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"NeoLoad helped us to transition from load testing to continuous performance measurement."

"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."

"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."

"Outside of the obvious benefits of load testing, the data we get back and are able to provide at the executive level provide a level comfort in the given application at peak periods, and drives direction for future performance-oriented projects and goals."

"I would rate it as eight out of 10 for ease of setting up."

"Overall, it seems like a good product."

"The stability is okay."

"We are able to use NeoLoad to quickly expand performance testing to all critical business applications and address some key performance issues."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pros

Cons

"I would rate their technical support 2.5 out of ten."

"OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so."

"Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support."

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"We have stability issues with the server logging off when a script runs from OTM."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"We would like to see the addition of one-to-one integrations with the Tricentis Tosca suite to this product, which would then cover the end-to-end needs of our customers who are looking for a single vendor solution."

"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the range of codeless scripting such as with terminal emulation apps."

"The only issue that I had was with network virtualization on load generators installed on Windows Server 2008 R2."

"The price of this solution could be reduced to make it more competitive."

"LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."

"The SAP area could be improved."

"The ability to show transactions per second during the test run is missing; currently, we have to eyeball the TPS using the graph."

"The protocol support area could be improved."

More Tricentis NeoLoad cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The tool's pricing is somewhat higher than licensed tools like LoadRunner. The approximate cost is around $25,000. There are no additional charges for maintenance or support. Everything is included in the package we have."

"Pricing for Tricentis NeoLoad could be cheaper because, at the moment, it's expensive. For a year, the solution cost us a lot of money, in particular, more than $50,000."

"Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."

"I don't have information on the licensing cost of Tricentis NeoLoad because my manager handles that. From a testing perspective and based on company requirements, the current license is for one thousand users."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"The tool is not cheap."

"From a licensing cost perspective, I rate the product an eight out of ten since it is a cheap solution that looks costly for certain areas."

"Its licensing cost is very less."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?

I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?

Tricentis NeoLoad use cases were for retail, specifically a US based retail customer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis NeoLoad?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 45% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 6% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis NeoLoad Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis NeoLoad

August 2026

Download Tricentis NeoLoad product report

Also Known As

OATS

NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.

Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.

What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?

Team Collaboration: Enables simultaneous work across different locations.
Comprehensive Insights: Custom graph options for detailed analysis.
User-Centric Design: Simplifies scripting without extensive coding knowledge.
Protocol Support: Facilitates mobile, web, and cloud-based testing.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Jenkins, Tableau, and others.
Scalability and Monitoring: Supports real-time monitoring and API integration.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: More affordable than some competitors while offering scalable solutions.
Improved Testing Accuracy: Real-world simulation of multi-user scenarios.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports both on-premise and SaaS models.
Enhanced Application Performance: Monitors system behavior effectively.

Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

September 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.