Top 10 Akamai mPulse Alternatives

3.3 out of 5

6 reviews
66% willing to recommend

693 followers

Top Akamai mPulse Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Akamai mPulse based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and New Relic. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Akamai Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Akamai, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace excels in AI-driven analytics and automation for proactive issue resolution. In comparison, Akamai mPulse offers detailed real-user monitoring and performance metrics. Dynatrace's simple deployment and superior support make it appealing, while Akamai mPulse provides valuable user experience insights despite higher costs.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Dynatrace Report

Pricing

Dynatrace setup cost is lower while Akamai mPulse offers a more comprehensive setup service.

View comparison

Pricing

Dynatrace setup cost is lower while Akamai mPulse offers a more comprehensive setup service.

Datadog

4.3 out of 5

Datadog

4.3 out of 5

Datadog attracts tech buyers with comprehensive monitoring and dynamic dashboards, excelling in versatility. In comparison, Akamai mPulse provides specialized web performance insights with real-user analytics, appealing to those focusing on optimizing customer experiences through detailed web traffic analysis.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Datadog Report

Pricing

Datadog's setup cost is straightforward and minimal, while Akamai mPulse has a more complex setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog's setup cost is straightforward and minimal, while Akamai mPulse has a more complex setup process.

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

New Relic offers real-time analytics and extensive plugins, making it easier to integrate. In comparison, Akamai mPulse provides advanced real user monitoring and detailed performance insights, appealing for its actionable intelligence. New Relic is budget-friendly, whereas mPulse justifies higher costs with significant ROI.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. New Relic Report

Pricing

New Relic typically involves a more straightforward setup with relatively lower initial costs, while Akamai mPulse often incurs higher setup expenses. Akamai mPulse may offer more comprehensive features, justifying the additional cost for a robust initialization.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

Splunk AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed analytics and backend insights, ideal for deep application management. In comparison, Akamai mPulse focuses on real-user monitoring and web performance, catering to those prioritizing front-end optimization. Splunk users appreciate robust data analysis, while mPulse appeals to those seeking swift integration.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report

Pricing

Splunk AppDynamics offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Akamai mPulse, which requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk AppDynamics offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Akamai mPulse, which requires a higher initial investment.

Grafana

3.9 out of 5

Grafana

3.9 out of 5

Akamai mPulse excels in real-time user monitoring and deep analytics. In comparison, Grafana stands out with powerful data visualization features and extensive plugin options. Akamai mPulse offers straightforward deployment but faces integration complexities. Grafana benefits from strong community support and extensive customization.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Grafana Report

Pricing

Akamai mPulse has a straightforward setup cost, while Grafana's is more complex and varies significantly. Akamai mPulse focuses on clear pricing, whereas Grafana might require additional configuration costs depending on the requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Sentry

4.3 out of 5

Sentry

4.3 out of 5

Akamai mPulse excels in integration capabilities within Akamai's ecosystem, offering robust real-user monitoring and performance analytics. In comparison, Sentry is favored for its error tracking and debugging efficiency. Akamai mPulse appeals to those needing comprehensive data insights, while Sentry attracts users with its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Sentry Report

Pricing

Akamai mPulse has a higher setup cost compared to Sentry, which offers a more affordable setup option to users.

View comparison

Pricing

Akamai mPulse has a higher setup cost compared to Sentry, which offers a more affordable setup option to users.

LogicMonitor

4.5 out of 5

LogicMonitor

4.5 out of 5

Organizations use LogicMonitor for monitoring infrastructure, networks, data centers, cloud environments, and applications, ensuring system performance and operational health. Managed service providers, universities, and companies leverage it for network devices, servers, and cloud setups. Features include custom data sources, dynamic thresholds, comprehensive network insights, remote access, and ease of use. Improvements needed in alarm logic, data source tuning, topology mapping, and licensing.

Pricing

I know we are saving at least several hundred thousand dollars in that we're not buying Cisco Prime.

We pay for the enterprise tech support.

View comparison

Pricing

I know we are saving at least several hundred thousand dollars in that we're not buying Cisco Prime.

We pay for the enterprise tech support.

Splunk Observability Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Splunk Observability Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Splunk Observability Cloud excels in feature flexibility with expansive analytics and integration options. In comparison, Akamai mPulse focuses on extensive real-user monitoring, offering valuable insights for user-centric businesses. Splunk's model enhances complex infrastructures, while Akamai's strength is in delivering performance insights for user experience.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report

Pricing

Splunk Observability Cloud involves substantial initial setup costs, while Akamai mPulse offers a more cost-effective setup option, emphasizing their contrasting approaches in pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk Observability Cloud involves substantial initial setup costs, while Akamai mPulse offers a more cost-effective setup option, emphasizing their contrasting approaches in pricing structure.

Instana Dynamic APM

3.8 out of 5

Instana Dynamic APM

3.8 out of 5

Akamai mPulse offers comprehensive real-user monitoring and detailed performance analytics, praised for easy deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM excels with automated root cause analysis, end-to-end tracing, and extensive performance insights, though its setup is more complex.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Instana Dynamic APM Report

Pricing

Akamai mPulse has a significant initial setup cost, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a more cost-effective startup option. Instana Dynamic APM is noted for its quick deployment, contrasting with the more complex setup process of Akamai mPulse.

View comparison

Pricing

Catchpoint

4.1 out of 5

Catchpoint

4.1 out of 5

Catchpoint excels in customer support and deployment ease, while Akamai mPulse offers a robust feature set and user-friendly design. In comparison, Catchpoint's monitoring capabilities are extensive with detailed reporting. Akamai mPulse, however, shines with real-time data and predictive analytics as key features.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. Catchpoint Report

Pricing

Catchpoint has lower setup costs compared to Akamai mPulse. Akamai mPulse, although higher in setup costs, may offer different value propositions.

View comparison

Pricing

Catchpoint has lower setup costs compared to Akamai mPulse. Akamai mPulse, although higher in setup costs, may offer different value propositions.

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Log Management

Mobile APM