What is our primary use case?
Our use cases include tracking down what end-users are using. We leverage it from an onboarding and offboarding perspective, so that when a user is exited from an organization or separates, Auvik SaaS Management allows us to produce a report very quickly to see what they've been using. Beyond the stuff we know, we also know if they were sharing accounts with somebody. That allows us to quickly remove access and then ask people that are still there.
And if we know that someone is coming into a company we know, based on similar users, what they need access to. It helps us to automate some of the onboarding and offboarding processes.
Overall, software discovery in an organization, what they're using, is the main use case.
How has it helped my organization?
The onboarding and offboarding aspects are valuable from an operational standpoint, as a managed service provider. Because we have that visibility, it really decreases the time we need to execute everything. We don't know what we don't know and Auvik SaaS Management closes that gap. With it, we know everything that they've touched from a software perspective and in terms of shared accounts. Without it, it would be virtually impossible to know those things.
When it comes to user offboarding, Auvik SaaS Management gives us a two-click checklist of everything that the user has access to, and it lays out what we're responsible to terminate access to and what stakeholders within the organization are responsible to terminate access to. We can use that playbook rapidly without anyone on my team or the client's team not knowing. We can reach out to a company's HR and say, "Did you remove that user's timekeeping, payroll app, et cetera, that we don't have access to?" It is important to check those boxes. Especially if they're subject to any type of compliance, they have to do that. The chances of that getting missed or of realizing we didn't cut access for six months because we just forgot—that doesn't happen anymore.
The efficiency that results from not missing things helps save us time. And the solution definitely cuts the amount of rework when onboarding users to see what they should have access to in comparison to other users, or when offboarding and not having to double and triple check if we have missed something. There are definitely time savings there. It adds massive efficiency to our user onboarding and offboarding processes.
From a software reporting standpoint, Auvik SaaS Management saves massive amounts of time. The tools that we had in place before Auvik SaaS Management would give us a complete on-prem software inventory, and then we'd have to spend lots of time interviewing, watching, and figuring out what people were using and how. And even then, we'd be missing probably 30 to 40 percent of the picture, because they didn't realize they were using something or the person we were talking to wasn't one of the two people in a 100-person organization leveraging a particular platform. Understanding what is in use within an organization would otherwise be a mostly manual process or a matter of pulling massive reports from our RMM platform, reports that we would have to dig through to figure things out.
And we're able to leverage the platform, in the context of our strategic consulting practice, to sit down with business stakeholders and discuss shadow IT and security; what they're doing, and why. It's an invaluable tool to have to help force those conversations. It helps our strategic consultants, our vCIOs have discussions around SaaS at a deeper level. The insights we gain from the platform help to drive major discussions about security as it relates to cloud-based applications and their use within an organization. It has really made an impact in that practice and has helped to drive revenue. It's an easy discussion starter about the bigger picture.
Understanding where data resides is absolutely critical, from both a day-to-day security and operational standpoint, but also in the event of a major issue or security event. If we don't know where our data is, that's obviously a major problem. Using Auvik SaaS Management to identify that on a lot of different levels makes it an invaluable tool for us.
Using Auvik SaaS Management has absolutely helped to mitigate our risk from shadow IT and data sprawl. Being able to visualize where stuff could be—giving us a starting point for all the apps that are touched within an organization, which is where data could reside—allows us to deal with it. That mitigates the risk of having people working outside of authorized applications, or a situation where the legal department is transacting within a personal Dropbox account instead of using OneDrive. There could be insurance issues where a policy won't cover us because someone used a personal space for data and it somehow leaked out. It definitely helps to mitigate that, broadly. It allows us to sleep better at night, for sure, knowing what is in use across the organization and what data could be in there.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features of Auvik SaaS Management is the insights into user applications and the security around that. We can understand and get full visibility into what end-users are using. Most organizations can list off the top five apps that they use but, lo and behold, we're able to discover that there are 30 or 40 apps in use within the organization that nobody knew about. From a security standpoint, helping to track those down is very critical and Auvik SaaS Management allows us to do that.
The single sign-on detection feature is also very important. If we have single sign-on, we can see what they're leveraging that sign-on to gain access to.
And an extremely important component of Auvik SaaS Management is the reporting engine. It allows us to perform assessments and sit down with organizations to review what they're actually doing with their SaaS apps. Typically, when we come in, they have no idea how many SaaS apps they have out there. They might not know that someone in accounting or someone in marketing just purchased something to accomplish a task. The reporting gives us visibility into that and is done in a fashion in which it's very easy to understand, with some of the executive summaries. We don't have to spend time having technical discussions about what the information means. We're able to have the discussion of what it means to the business and for solving problems there. The reporting is absolutely critical and they do a good job of it.
What needs improvement?
There could be improvements to the ease of clicking through the UI. I know they're working on updates there.
They've started working on integrations with other platforms for sharing data across other tools that are commonly used in the industry. I'd like to see that continue to improve. They do have to make the integrations deeper.
I would also like further abilities for customizing the reporting.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Auvik for a total of seven or eight years, including three years at my current company. I've been using Auvik SaaS Management for about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We've had zero issues with the platform going down.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We haven't run into any issues with it scaling.
We've deployed it quite a bit across a large client base, with a couple of thousand endpoints ongoing. We have it deployed to about 20 separate environments across our client base. They range in size from 15 users up to a 400-person, multinational company around the globe whose SaaS we help manage. It's all over the world and it has proven successful for us.
How are customer service and support?
Their technical support is fantastic. Every time we've reached out, we've gotten a response within an hour or less. The support team has made itself extremely available to resolve issues or take feature requests whenever we have them.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have a previous solution.
How was the initial setup?
Surprisingly, for what it does, the initial setup was straightforward and easier than we anticipated. The only hiccup we ran into was that the deployment integration with our RMM was not fully set up and ready to go. They rapidly changed that and, once they did, it became very simple to deploy. We can get Auvik SaaS Management on its way to being deployed within about 15 minutes, and then it can start doing its thing. It has proven to be very easy to do.
Two people were involved in implementing it in our organization. My involvement was more on the business side, focusing on how we leverage the platform. We had one technical resource who ran through the installation and it did not take very long.
In terms of maintenance, we have to stay on top of categorizing applications as they come in. The initial run-through of categorizing what apps are used and how they're used gets easier every time. We'll get alerted when new applications come online for a client. That generates a ticket. We then have to go in and categorize them or reach out to the client to ask, "What is this? How are we using it? Who is the stakeholder or the owner of the application?" From there, we document it. After that, maintenance takes minutes a month, next to nothing from a management perspective.
We also do a quarterly review with our clients of the new applications that have arrived to make sure things are on par. If there are any high-risk applications, we reach out immediately. Overall, from a maintenance perspective, it's minimal.
What was our ROI?
We have not run a program to fully monetize just Auvik SaaS Management as an offering within our organization. Where the ROI has come in is that our strategic consultants, who are expensive resources, are quickly able to pull data and then have those discussions with clients. It has cut down the time it takes to get that data by a lot, and from our point of view, all we have to sell is time. The fact that they're spending less time preparing for meetings is a huge return for us.
And onboarding and offboarding are a big part for us, from a service-delivery standpoint, and Auvik SaaS Management is a time-saver there.
The big return for us is the creation of efficiencies within our service delivery team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is definitely value from Auvik SaaS Management, so I don't think it's outrageously priced. There's always room for evolution of the model, depending on how the platform is being leveraged. But that's more of a "math game" in terms of how they want to present it. With the model we're in, we get a lot of value for what we're paying, and I think that's the sign that they're in the right pricing band. I feel that we're getting value and that it's not a stretch, and that's good.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We put Auvik SaaS Management up against multiple products as part of the selection process. One other solution was a finalist. We demoed and ran with both for a while, and Auvik SaaS Management came out on top.
It's excellent for providing an overview of a SaaS ecosystem. It provides visibility into what is actively being used from a SaaS standpoint at a level that we don't have through any other tools. We've looked at other tool stacks to help us get our arms around this, but Auvik SaaS Management has solved it in a unique way that's a little easier to understand. It's definitely cost-effective, and provides a better, complete picture than some of the competitors we looked at.
The out-of-the-box reporting in Auvik SaaS Management is more complete and it provides a focus on MSP functionality versus just reporting. The other products concentrate on what is going on in your company. Auvik SaaS Management has information not only on what's going on in your company but can also break that down at a much deeper level due to the amount of data that it collects and how it collects it. We can see what users are using, rather than only having visibility at an organizational level.
One of the negatives of Auvik SaaS Management, although not a major one, is the way it collects data, being plugin-based instead of agent-based. That raises some eyebrows at times when people notice the plugin in their browser. In the end, we decided that wasn't that big of a deal, and that we could walk through that with clients if it became an issue.
One of the other cons that came up was that, when we first deployed it, the integration with our RMM was not fully baked, while the competitor's was. So the deployment was a bit challenging, but when we discussed that with them we found out it was on the roadmap to be simplified, and they did so rapidly. That actually proved to be a pro for them: their ability to rapidly employment changes to the platform.
What other advice do I have?
We don't really dig into the logging side of the solution. They keep a mountain of data that is at our fingertips if we want it. They're really good at collecting it. We don't leverage at the level of parsing through it, but from a collection standpoint, given all of the logging that it does, it's pretty robust.
When evaluating a SaaS management solution, look at what you're trying to accomplish going into it, and then look at the solution that aligns with those end goals. To just throw out a goal like, "I'm looking for SaaS management," might be a great start, but what are you trying to do with that? Find what application is going to meet those requirements. I know that's a simple definition for any type of software acquisition, but especially in the service-provider realm, everyone says they need to do SaaS management. Whether you're looking at Auvik SaaS Management or one or two of their service-provider-focused competitors, they all do it a little bit differently. Depending on what your end goals are, one is going to fit better than the others.