Blue Prism Reviews

We like the reliability and robustness of Blue Prism. The object design way of implementing things actually brings a lot of reusability for us because you can design your objects once and leverage them in multiple automations. So, we use this extensively.

There are a lot of things that could be improved. The very first thing is their control room, and they are still sticking to the desktop version, which restricts access. You can't really access it from anywhere. The entire industry is moving towards cloud-based solutions. Blue Prism should make it RPA-as-a-Service cloud version. I would definitely like to see how they could really make it more accessible, going beyond desktop applications.

They have recently launched their web version, but that is still a read-only version of the control room. The web version of their control room could be accessible from anywhere so that I don't have to go and log into a specific machine.

Additionally, we tried integrating some of the applications to Blue Prism, and there was no REST API. It is still following the older mechanism using SOAP API, which again restricted quite a number of the integrations that we wanted to do. Exposing their artifacts through web APIs, REST APIs, would be good, which is normal nowadays.

It would be good to build more objects; they have very limited objects available, that is, implicit objects. If I need to connect to ServiceNow, I would need to build all those things. So they could really step up and create customized objects as an implicit feature that they could include.

I've been working with it for two years. We've been using versions 6.4, 6.9, and 6.10 and are currently evaluating 7 as well.

I think Blue Prism has the capability to scale its automations. In terms of handling a load, as well as extending the digital workforce for a single process, it supports multi-bot architecture.

However, as far as robustness in terms of when we scale robots, that is, when we want to extend the robots for a process where multiple bots are working, I think Blue Prism has a certain edge because of the maturity this tool has gained over the years.

I work very closely with the support team and their professional services teams, and I think that Blue Prism provides very good support.

I worked with Automation Anywhere before Blue Prism.

The initial setup is fairly okay in comparison. With Blue Prism, I could configure all of the types of configuration that Blue Prism supports. Whether it is single sign-on, app server-based, database, or single login, it was all quite simple.

Blue Prism has a higher cost with respect to RPA enablement, particularly if you are trying to start with RPA. If you are a middle-scale company, then the cost of robots and their overall infrastructure can become really huge. You would feel like this is really a costly affair to start with RPA.

So, Blue Prism has a higher cost if you are talking about middle-scale companies. However, if you're thinking of having more than 50 bots or 100 bots, perhaps this will have a lower impact on your cost. In general, Blue Prism is costly.

If an organization is more focused on internal automations which belong to their own infrastructure and they want to comply with their security requirements, then I would recommend Blue Prism.

If, however, an organization wants to really move forward towards the cloud and towards intelligent automation and integrations, then I would definitely recommend UiPath.

If you want to build your team, look for a person who has development background because of Blue Prism's implementation. It follows object-oriented concepts, where you create your object, which is like a reusable class or reusable artifact.

Even with regard to processes, you have to really think of developing them or writing your automation in such a way that it complies with what has been designed in the objects. I think a developer mindset is very much required for developing automation through Blue Prism.

Overall, I would rate Blue Prism at six on a scale from one to ten.

We use the solution for features such as two-factor authentications, product compatibility, etc. Also, we use it to monitor dashboards and for logging different applications.

The solution's most valuable features are RPA automation, auditing, and validation of metrics in web applications.

They should incorporate more functionalities in the analytics tool.

We have been using the solution for a year.

It is a stable solution. Sometimes service failure occurs. But it fails due to the infrastructure rather than the tool.

I once raised a query regarding the user bucket issues.

Positive

We have used Micro Focus earlier for IT operations management and HPE operation orchestration features.

The installation process takes a week to complete. It gets installed in three stages, development, test, and production environments. Sometimes, while configuring the solution with Windows servers, we are restricted from testing a few functions for security purposes. We can't test Blue Prism's Agent components because of the restrictions.

Our team of three executives, including me, a Database Administrator, and an Operating Systems Administrator, implement the solution for customers.

I rate the solution as a nine out of ten.

We are using Blue Prism mainly for the finance and IT automation processes.

The most valuable feature of Blue Prism is the control and development of the processes from one location.

The solution can improve by having a free license for evaluation purposes.

I have been using Blue Prism for approximately one year.

Blue Prism is a stable solution.

The scalability of the solution is good.

The solution can be suitable for all sized businesses, but it depends on the use case.

The support from Blue Prism is very good.

I have used UiPath and Robocorp. Blue Prism is more stable and provides good support, and a monitoring and development perspective.

Robocorp provides Python as a programming license and the cost is very low. All the features are available, but coding knowledge is required.

The initial setup of Blue Prism is of a moderate difficulty level.

I do the implementation of the solution with my clients.

The price of Blue Prism is high compared to others solutions. It would be helpful if they could provide a trial version for new users to try. Other vendors provide a community or trial version. There are not any hidden costs.

There are three different packages Blue Prism provides.

We are completely satisfied with the solution.

From a monitoring perspective, we have various stages and phases in RPA that enable us to perform monitoring, scheduling, and management simultaneously, which is a significant advantage. As a result, I can recommend to my colleagues that they utilize this capability and obtain certification.

I rate Blue Prism an eight out of ten.

We have a partnership with Blue Prism and I'm a software engineer. 

This is a good solution. I like working with multi-bot architecture, it's very flexible. 

In the object section, there are certain things such as the navigation in the UI that could be improved. It would be helpful for developers. I'd like to see more technical support for the team and the provision of some community versions for people to learn the product. I believe it would also benefit Blue Prism to better understand the requirements of those using the product.

I've been using this solution for almost four years. 

The solution is generally stable although we have had some inconsistencies. 

The solution is definitely scalable. 

The value of this product could be greatly improved if we could get satisfactory answers from the technical support. The last time I opted for a learning license from one of my colleagues, I never received a response from the company.

The initial setup wasn't too complex and didn't take a long time. 

The solution has cross-application features where it can be set up with SAP, email, or SharePoint.

The solution could be more user-friendly. I would like the see the inclusion of a recording feature as in Microsoft, SAP, and other legacy systems. Users can play the recording and use it for future use cases. The recording can help with the automation and configuration. I would rate the tool’s interface a seven out of ten. It needs to improve.

We have been using the solution for around two to three years.

The product is quite stable.

The solution is scalable. We have around 100 users for it in our company and we intend to scale up the numbers.

We have never contacted the tech support team since we have our own internal technical team.

The solution is enterprise software so we will try to maximize our usage during the available slots. We will get ROI with the high price since there will be some value added with automation. I think that after doing a cost-benefit analysis, we are on the positive side.

I would rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

We have various use cases for the solution and deploy it on AWS Cloud.

When we need specific reports, the default reports posted in the interactive clients are not helpful but can be useful. However, this means we can utilize only the minimum level, but we want to use more input data from the Blue Prism tool, which means we need to fetch more of the data from the table side, and for this, we need to integrate many tables for this integrating of data. So it becomes difficult to get a BP database onwards.

We are additionally migrating the Blue Prism database to different clouds. Blue Prism currently supports SQL Servers, and structured data, it is stored as an income performer. When we migrate to a process from a different environment, we either need to go with the complete restoration of the GP or we need to lose the data. This is because if you have ten processes, five processes may complete the testing. Other processes may still depend on the current environment when we move to live production. So since it can take weeks or months, we may lose the data while waiting, and we cannot integrate both from different clouds. 

Hence, the solution can be improved by enhancing the process's data storage and by including a common check. Sometimes, if the developer fails to identify a timetable directly, it will impact other processes. Currently, all processes are stored on the various tables in the Blue Prism, and the pre-check can ensure the developer is notified.

The solution can be improved by switching off data DB and including a report section with a morphing feature, like more reporting waste.

We have been using the solution for a year and a half, and we are recently migrated to version 6.10.2.

The solution is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

I rate scalability an eight out of ten, but when we interact with different environments, it is difficult to communicate, and DB synchronization is problematic. We currently have approximately 50 people utilizing the solution in our organization.

Technical support is often delayed as it takes four to five days to resolve issues since some people work across different time zones under constraints. Additionally, they are not traceable when we need to forward the case to a high level, and it takes another week to escalate to a higher level, which is unacceptable.

Deployment depends on the process' complexity level. It depends on if you want a straightforward process or gradual deployment over two weeks. For example, one week for the UIT testing and another week for SIT testing, four days for UIT testing and working at the QI level, and the following week for production, and in one month, we can take up hyper care. This is the best practice.

We did light scale mode for the deployment process, so when one process came into the picture, we ensured that the production environment would be ready for that process. So far from size, without any delays in the project deadlines and once the process is developed and code reviews are completed, we take internal approval to move the code to the following environments. So we can use duplicate and use different tools for pushing this code in the CIPD environment level or move this cycle management, like import and export processes.

We implemented it in-house.

The license is expensive, however, I cannot share the exact cost.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Our primary use case for the solution varied, and some of the use cases were in financial and billing, while others were in managed services and automating infrastructure. It is deployed on-premises.

The biggest benefit the solution provided was in the financial sector. Specifically, in billing and processing orders for customers. So it focused on processing manual data that was coming from various systems or interfaces and putting it into the billing platform.

We find the stability and the ease of reusing code design valuable.

We had a lot of challenges managing authentication and reusing or using external authentication providers. For example, in API interaction, we need to get tokens from a centralized authentication platform that was always running for us. The solution can include attended robots similar to UiPath in the next release.

We have been using the solution for approximately five years and are currently using version 8.6.

The stability is good, but it is not perfect. I rate it an eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability an eight out of ten and it could be improved.

We had a good experience with customer service and support. I rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

I was not part of the initial setup.

We implemented the solution in-house, with an internal IT support operational team consisting of approximately ten people covering shifts so that they will be able to monitor and maintain the robots 24/7.

Based on the project, the solutions have a return on investment or breaking point at roughly 18 months. I rate the overall ROI a six out of ten. It is just a little bit above the breaking point but it is worth it. It does not have much benefit in the long term because our businesses are changing, and the time to use the robot was short.

The solution is costly. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten, with ten being the highest price. It was approximately 700 euros monthly. Additionally, there was 25% included on subscriptions for maintenance but the percentage varied from year to year.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. The solution is good, but its authentication features can be improved, and the price can be more affordable. I advise new users to have a clear business value and a good process defined before implementing the solution.

The solution was deployed on-prem. We have about 100 users.

We were partners with Blue Prism.

There has been a huge amount of cost savings and freeing up. Employees got more vacation time allotted. That was a direct result of the time saved by RPA.

As a developer, I liked the layout and UI, specifically when it came to testing. Dragging and dropping stages and actions made development quick and easy to learn. The UI, allows you to watch as the bot moves through each step of the process at the same time it launches, interacts and closes applications, which really aids development and troubleshooting, unlike with AA and UiPath.  

I don't have an suggestions for improvement, at this time.

I used Blue Prism for five years. The last time I used it was a year ago.

The solution was stable.

Scalability was easy.

Technical support wasn't great. On a scale of 1 to 5, I would give it a 3.

Initial setup was straightforward. On a scale of 1 to 5, I would rate the difficulty of setup a 4.

Deployment took a couple of months from development to publishing it into production. We didn't have an implementation strategy. 

We had 25 developers for deployment and maintenance. We had about a dozen in production for support.

Deployment was done in-house.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.

I'm one of the senior consultants in the company I work for, we are a service provider and we provide IT services to our customers. One of these services we provide is automation, using tools, such as Blue Prism.

We are upgrading to version 7.01 of Blue Prism in a few months.

We are using Blue Prism recently for statistics processes, which is the automation of SAP transactions for our logistics departments. Additionally, it is being used for SAP transactions within our IT finance service department. We do many things with it, such as partial reset and ticket re-keying. We have incident tickets logs from the IT department, which can be from emails, and we do re-keying exercises.

Blue Prism can improve a lot. The interaction with Google Chrome can be massively improved. I know in the next version there are slight improvements. We don't know how much, but we are comparing them. At this moment, Google Chrome is a massive issue within the toolset, due to the way Google Chrome receives updates regularly but Blue Prism is unable to cope. The spy method of Google Chrome is not as user-friendly as Internet Explorer is. However, Internet Explorer is being discontinued from their support, therefore it's not the best browser to be using. This has caused us major issues in the last six months. 

Our customers go through platforms, such as CyberArk and Citrix. The way that Blue Prism interacts with these applications could improve. There are a few other issues, such as memory, but these are the key problems that have offered issues in the past six months or so.

I have used Blue Prism within the past 12 months.

We have had a mixed experience of the stability of the solution. The problem that we have faced might be our infrastructure. The application itself can't be completely blamed. I think some of the issues are down to our VM infrastructure, the application service that we use, and the host that the servers are hosted on. In terms of the application, we have not seen many issues.

The technical support is very good.

I have used UiPath previously.

You don't need to be a technical developer to develop in Blue Prism, you follow the natural way you have developed. Whilst with UiPath, you need some development background to be able to develop in it.

We have been using Blue Prism for approximately eight years and when we first set it up it was a bit complex, but we always had support from the license of Blue Prism and other providers that we have within our organization. The whole process was fairly easy because of the support we had.

My advice to others would be to make sure they fully understand the use cases. If they are implementing it for customers, you're going to come across connectivity issues and make sure that you fully understand that it's not going to work right away. You're going to have to have a few releases into production, be mindful of Google Chrome and the issues that you may come across.

I rate Blue Prism an eight out of ten.

As for primary use cases, we have done purchase order processing for close to five countries, and we also do non-compliance in terms of the field assets deployed by a company to hospitals. That is, we use it as an asset tracking solution.

From technical perspective, Blue Prism is pretty good.

Overall, it's a stable and scalable solution. Installation is straightforward as well. 

Blue Prism could be compatible with Oracle's suite of ERPs. We have seen some issues related to this.

They could do much better with their intelligent document processing solution. They're pretty behind and don't have attended bots.

I would also prefer a better UI in the administration screens The user interface is pretty bad from an administration perspective.

I would like to see a lot of features like process mining.

I would also like to see a lot of different innovative solutions like human-bot interaction, handover managerial systems, and collaboration systems for process capturing, storing, and evaluating and getting discussions done within businesses.

We have been providing Blue Prism to customers for more than three years now.

From a platform perspective, we see compatibility issues with Oracle's JD Edwards software sometimes, but overall, to my knowledge, the solution is stable.

It's a scalable solution, and scalability is not a problem.

With regard to the initial setup, it's a pretty straightforward from Blue Prism's perspective. It's not as complicated as the installation of a WorkFusion solution, for example.

The actual installation, that is, setting up of the environment, can be done in less than a week from scratch.

We have four or five customers using this solution, and I have close to 50 or so people working across these customers. We have a combination of staff, such as architects, developers, managers, infrastructure engineers, etc.

Our customers pay for an annual license.

The product is good even though there are a lot of shortcomings. Also, the access to the company itself is very difficult. Obtaining a partnership is difficult, and getting support is difficult as well. So, I'd rate them at seven on a scale from one to ten.