11:11 Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery comparison

11:11 Systems and Microsoft are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. 11:11 Systems is ranked #10, while Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.6. 11:11 Systems holds a 6.1% mindshare in DRS, compared to Microsoft’s 11.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of 11:11 Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

11:11 Disaster Recovery

Read 1 11:11 Disaster Recovery review

499 Views
329 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

2,529 Views
885 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

11:11 Disaster Recovery

Azure Site Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 11:11 Disaster Recovery and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Commvault, Microsoft and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

11:11 Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Site Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category, the mindshare of 11:11 Disaster Recovery is 6.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Site Recovery is 11.7%, down from 23.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery as a Service Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Site Recovery	11.7%
11:11 Disaster Recovery	6.1%
Other	82.2%

Disaster Recovery as a Service

Featured Reviews

it_user1221

Database Expert at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Excellent Rental Data Centres to simulate a DR (Disaster Recovery) operation .

SunGard provides DR (Disaster Recovery) services at it's data centers. The service is for companies who do not maintain their own dedicated DR sites and need to rent one to conduct a DR exercise for validating it's DR setup. These centers have state of the art equipment with all possible hardware options and one needs to define their specific requirements. Companies can rent their hardware cages at SunGard Site and have options to replicate their critical data at the DR site periodically. They can then simulate the DR exercise when desired. Additionally Tape restores are also possible at the DR site.

Read full review

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

Long-term user praises cost savings and reliability of disaster recovery solutions

There is only one thing to note: the agent has to be up-to-date when SCCM or any third-party tools are doing patching activities. If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery. Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer. When you raise a call, they wait too long, and even if you request an engineer to set up a call for severity B cases, they are not ready to communicate over the phone, preferring email instead.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"These centers have state of the art equipment with all possible hardware options and one needs to define their specific requirements."

"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."

"It’s native to Azure and does exactly what it’s designed to do—recover one site to another without creating all the VMs on that site. This helps reduce costs on the secondary site."

"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"The features I find most valuable in Azure Site Recovery include the test failover, which allows us to test our site recovery without bringing down the primary; disaster recovery provides that feature."

"The setup is quite easy, just requiring the creation of a vault."

"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes, it is stable, and it always works, and it is also scalable and easy to set up."

"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

Cons

"This is a good service, however a costly one."

"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."

"The immutable backup could be better and should be improved."

"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."

"There have been issues with replication. It would be helpful if error logging was handled more effectively."

"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."

"Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options."

"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site."

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"They have a license to pay."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Site Recovery?

My main use case for Azure Site Recovery is that we are doing cross-region disaster recovery and processing.

See all answers

Comparisons

RapidScale vs 11:11 Disaster Recovery

Compared 37% of the time

Agility Recovery Disaster Recovery Services vs 11:11 Disaster Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

Rubrik vs 11:11 Disaster Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Disaster Recovery Services vs 11:11 Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs 11:11 Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

More 11:11 Disaster Recovery Competitors

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 12% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

SEP Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

March 2026

Download 11:11 Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

March 2026

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Also Known As

Sungard Disaster Recovery Services

No data available

Overview

11:11 Disaster Recovery offers comprehensive solutions for data resilience and business continuity. It ensures businesses can recover swiftly from disruptions, protecting critical data and processes.

11:11 Disaster Recovery is a robust, reliable service designed for organizations prioritizing seamless data protection. Known for its adaptability, this service caters to diverse recovery plans, minimizing system downtimes and safeguarding information assets. With a focus on high availability and scalability, users can configure plans to meet dynamic IT requirements, ensuring quick data retrieval and restoration.

What are the valuable features of 11:11 Disaster Recovery?

Automated Recovery Testing: Ensures systems can be restored effectively.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing data and business needs.
Data Encryption: Protects sensitive information during transfer and storage.
Real-Time Monitoring: Continuously checks system health for quick intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from 11:11 Disaster Recovery?

Reduced Downtime: Fast recovery options to minimize operational interruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized plans that align with budget constraints.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection strategies to keep data safe.
Improved Compliance: Meets industry standards for data protection and privacy.

11:11 Disaster Recovery is implemented across industries like healthcare, finance, and retail, where data integrity is critical. It provides solutions tailored to sector-specific regulations and business challenges, ensuring applications remain active and data is secure in incident scenarios.

11:11 Systems

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Ullico Inc., Dakotacare

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Commvault, Microsoft and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.