ACL Analytics vs MetricStream comparison

Diligent and MetricStream are both solutions in the GRC category. Diligent is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while MetricStream is ranked #9. Diligent holds a 2.4% mindshare in G, compared to MetricStream’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Diligent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of MetricStream users who would recommend it.

ACL Analytics

Read 11 ACL Analytics reviews

2,751 Views
2,036 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MetricStream

Read 2 MetricStream reviews

1,250 Views
1,075 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ACL Analytics

MetricStream

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

MetricStream and ACL Analytics are competing products in governance, risk, and compliance management. MetricStream has the upper hand with its robust support and competitive pricing, while ACL Analytics is valued for sophisticated data analysis capabilities.

Features: MetricStream provides comprehensive compliance management tools, audit management, and flexible reporting functionalities. ACL Analytics offers advanced data analytics, intuitive visualization, and audit analytics features. The main difference is MetricStream's focus on risk management integration, whereas ACL Analytics specializes in data manipulation and visualization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MetricStream offers cloud and on-premise deployment options with responsive customer support. ACL Analytics also supports multiple deployment methods and is noted for AI-driven analytics simplifying installation. MetricStream's customer support is known for efficiency, whereas ACL Analytics excels in technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: MetricStream is seen as cost-effective, suitable for budget-conscious organizations with a positive ROI from its tools. ACL Analytics may have higher initial costs but offers substantial ROI through advanced analytics. The key difference is MetricStream's lower entry cost compared to ACL Analytics's premium pricing for advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed ACL Analytics vs. MetricStream Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. MetricStream

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACL Analytics

Ranking in Continuous Controls Monitoring

1st

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MetricStream

Ranking in Continuous Controls Monitoring

9th

Ranking in GRC

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (4th), IT Vendor Risk Management (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the GRC category, the mindshare of ACL Analytics is 2.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MetricStream is 3.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ACL Analytics	2.4%
MetricStream	3.0%
Other	94.6%

GRC

Featured Reviews

reviewer2707797

ACL Consultant

Have significantly reduced audit hours through automation and advanced data integration with robust connectors

The key feature of ACL Analytics is integration, which allows for vast amounts of data sources you can connect to. The tool itself allows you to integrate it into your audit work in terms of taking exceptions that you receive from your analytics. It provides integration into your GRC platform and into your audit working files, and then one key thing is the vast amounts of connectors. We have seen a return on investment as we have mostly reduced working hours for the audit engagements. If an auditor was normally budgeted to take 600 hours, we have implemented a solution to take those audit hours down to 200 hours. We are mostly taking those metrics.

Read full review

AdhishP

Practice Lead Cybersecurity at Finesse Global

Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support

They have now reworked it. The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers. It's a very good feature that the product offers. It is also available as a cloud option, which is getting a lot of interest from customers who are looking into the GRCC. It is very useful, especially in the solution platform. It has good features and good functionality, and our customers feel there is a lot of merit in that. I think that the portal is constantly improving. They do their own enhancements very often. They keep doing those enhancements from their site itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I did not have any problems with the stability of ACL Analytics."

"It improved my organization using an automated audit revision with scripts."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spreadsheets or other documents for incorporation into reports is particularly helpful."

"ACL Analytics is a great application that helps me analyze data more effectively compared to other tools like Excel."

"We have seen a return on investment as we have mostly reduced working hours for the audit engagements."

"I like the fact that in the duplicate section, I can find matches, and I can find situations where certain cells or certain cell points match, but there's a difference as well between two different records."

"The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its powerful data control capabilities."

"I rate ACL Analytics nine out of ten."

More ACL Analytics pros

"Key features are usability and ease of configuration. It allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."

"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."

Cons

"A person must have someone teach them how to use ACL Analytics as a common person cannot use it independently."

"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."

"The ease of use could be better."

"The tool's pricing is quite high. When I purchased the software, I constantly contacted the representatives. I requested a single license, but they informed me that only packages of three licenses were available. This made it very difficult for us to manage the cost, especially given the economic challenges in our country."

"The product's pricing has increased over the years."

"Currently, the platform is not very comfortable for users coming from a non-technical or non-coding background."

"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."

"I believe the formulas and scripting language in ACL Analytics need development to be easier for me to use."

More ACL Analytics cons

"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."

"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of $5,000 is high, and transferring money from one country to another, particularly in dollars, is challenging due to high exchange rates. Although we managed to purchase it then, the lack of a single license option and the high cost were issues."

"The pricing for me as an individual seems a lot. For our organization, the price is okay. It's about $6,000 a year. I don't know of any additional costs."

"They are flexible in terms of customers' needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACL Analytics?

The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACL Analytics?

I would rate the pricing of ACL Analytics as a 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACL Analytics?

We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it. Every time you enter...

See all answers

What are the main differences between RSA Archer, MetricStream and IBM OpenPages?

RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages and MetricStream are the top GRC software solutions in the market today. Out of the 3, IBM OpenPages has a slightly upper hand as IBM has come up with powerful Artificial ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CaseWare IDEA SymSure Monitor vs ACL Analytics

Compared 19% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs ACL Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs ACL Analytics

Compared 10% of the time

AuditBoard vs ACL Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ACL Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

More ACL Analytics Competitors

RSA Archer vs MetricStream

Compared 28% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs MetricStream

Compared 20% of the time

AuditBoard vs MetricStream

Compared 7% of the time

Mitratech Prevalent vs MetricStream

Compared 6% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs MetricStream

Compared 6% of the time

More MetricStream Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics

January 2026

Download ACL Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

January 2026

Download MetricStream product report

Also Known As

ACL

No data available

Overview

ACL Analytics connects you to any data source, and lets you run sophisticated risk analytics and detect anomalies or patterns that you simply can't illuminate with any amount of random sampling, spreadsheet ninjutsu or generic business intelligence. It's designed for you, the GRC professional.

Diligent

Provides advanced capabilities such as risk calculators and risk heat maps for risk analysis and monitoring.

MetricStream

Sample Customers

Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance

Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, ACCO Brands Corporation, AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AIB International, Associated Banc-Corp, BAE Systems, Barclaycard, Dell Inc, DIRECTV, Energizer, Fresenius Kabi, Hasbro, Goodyear, HudsonCity Savings Bank, Infigen Energy, Kaydon, Leroy Merlin, Mountry Financial Corp., Nicholas Piramal, Pepco, Pfizer, Societe Generale, Whitney Bank

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. MetricStream

December 2025

Free Report: ACL Analytics vs. MetricStream

Find out what your peers are saying about ACL Analytics vs. MetricStream and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ACL Analytics vs. MetricStream report.

See our list of best GRC vendors and best Continuous Controls Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.