Adlumin Security Operations vs Field Effect MDR comparison

N-able and Field Effect are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. N-able is ranked #23, while Field Effect is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.2. N-able holds a 2.3% mindshare in MDR, compared to Field Effect’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution.

Adlumin Security Operations

Read 1 Adlumin Security Operations review

2,818 Views
1,381 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Read 31 Field Effect MDR reviews

5,143 Views
5,092 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adlumin Security Operations

Field Effect MDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Adlumin Security Operations and Field Effect MDR are competitors in the cybersecurity sector. Adlumin is favored for its cost-effectiveness and robust customer support, while Field Effect MDR's comprehensive features may justify its higher price.

Features: Adlumin focuses on intelligent threat detection, automated compliance reporting, and seamless integration. Field Effect MDR emphasizes advanced threat analytics, comprehensive incident response capabilities, and sophisticated network analysis tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adlumin provides straightforward deployment with extensive customer support and quick resolution times. Field Effect MDR offers a more complex deployment requiring in-depth training, catering to organizations seeking a hands-on approach.

Pricing and ROI: Adlumin offers competitive pricing and substantial ROI with lower setup costs. Field Effect MDR, while higher in price, provides long-term value through deep analysis capabilities and sophisticated features, offering lasting returns despite higher initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adlumin Security Operations

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

23rd

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (54th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (25th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (41st), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (24th)

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Adlumin Security Operations is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 2.2%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Field Effect MDR	2.2%
Adlumin Security Operations	2.3%
Other	95.5%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

NickShmakov

Md at Res-Q

Strong security reporting has supported our consulting work and drives better integration choices

I rated Adlumin Security Operations probably the same as Huntress at eight. They are better at reporting and better integrations. The integrations in terms of the number of integrations you can run from them or connect to are not as many as available with Huntress, but they have easier implementation. Overall, I would say it is the same. I do not want to see any additional features in the next release of Adlumin Security Operations, but I would change the pricing a little bit for around SIEM integrations and SIEM data collection. That is probably the maximum I would do. I do not really have much to say because that is literally five percent of our deployments versus ninety-five percent being Huntress. My overall rating for this review is eight.

Read full review

reviewer2753850

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Customer security is enhanced with software and update detection while licensing process needs improvement

A quick specific example of how I use Field Effect MDR to keep my customers secure is that it helps me identify computers that need updates, even when I believe they are already updated. Field Effect MDR finds software and Windows updates that aren't being completed, which I find very valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We normally focus on Huntress."

"The alerts that we get are valuable. It notifies us if there is any attempted access and if there are any areas where we need to create more security for clients. It is stopping anything from happening before there is even an issue."

"The most valuable aspects of Covalence for me are the exceptional customer service and the support from the dedicated team."

"There are user notifications about our cloud solutions and access, meaning authentication and possible breaches. Overall, the notifications and alerts are valuable. There are also new features like the DNS protection, which is quite good."

"One of the most useful and impressive features of the system is its detailed notification mechanism."

"What I like the most about Field Effect Covalence is the ease of deployment, the fact that it's cost-effective to roll out, and it is reasonable."

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"The most valuable aspect of Field MDR is the comprehensive visibility the solution offers. Most solutions cover the traditional threat landscape of computers, endpoints, servers, etc. However, there are also things happening within the network environment, such as WiFi, mobile, the Internet of Things, smart TVs, video surveillance systems, etc., that have associated vulnerabilities. Most environments do not manage or protect these assets."

"Covalence's cloud protection element has been excellent. A lot of organizations are using 365. It's hard to find a secure solution for protecting accounts. We've gone down the path of trying to utilize other security solutions for that particular area. We've been disappointed and always come back to trying to implement Covalence when we can so we know people are safe."

More Field Effect MDR pros

Cons

"Adlumin Security Operations's functionality is probably slightly better, but implementation and integration with Office 365 was not as straightforward."

"Covalence's SEAS feature wasn't very user-friendly."

"The interface is perhaps the weakest part of the entire platform, and that does not mean that it is deficient. It is just not as optimized and as efficient as other aspects of the platform."

"There are tags for security threats, but I only view them. I do not action anything. I just see what is happening. Sometimes, they are a little bit vague, and I am unsure what they mean, so I leave that to the IT experts. Overall, we are quite satisfied with their product and how it is working."

"It would be more effective if it could surgically isolate the specific malicious process instead of deleting the entire machine."

"While Covalence addresses our notification and visibility needs, it falls short in keeping information up-to-date, which is where our MSP comes in to supplement its functionality."

"It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying."

"They could use more third-party integrations with other MSP tools."

"In the AROs tab, if we encounter multiple duplicate recommendations, it would be helpful to be able to select and resolve or dismiss them all at once."

More Field Effect MDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"A top-tier competitor to Field Effect in Magic Quadrant that we had been using until our switch to Field Effect was a great product, but each capability had an additional charge. We had to license modules separately, and each of those add-ons had to be added onto its own consumption and agreement. It was a nightmare from a billing perspective because we had multiple agreements, and each one had a jagged anniversary or a renewal anniversary. It was a nightmare, whereas Field Effect MDR is one product."

"While the contract duration might change, the pricing remains highly attractive."

"Field Effect is fairly priced from my perspective. You get a lot of bang for the buck with this and a level of visibility that provides you with greater peace of mind knowing that the system is carefully monitored. You also have automated responses for known malicious behavior at any time of the day. Someone could have their Office 365 mailbox compromised at 2 in the morning on a Saturday when most people are asleep or not paying attention, and the system can prevent an issue in an automated way."

"The shift to a per-user pricing model and the introduction of a base price for the on-premises or virtual appliance has been particularly advantageous."

"We were particularly impressed with their pricing model, which charges per user rather than per system."

"It is on the high end, but it is worth it for the service that you get from them."

"The cost of the solution is high."

"While Field Effect Covalence's pricing seems competitive for the market, the biggest hurdle lies in the lack of dedicated security budgets within many organizations."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

One way Field Effect MDR can be improved is through its licensing process, which is not ideal. The licensing process is difficult because I have to access a separate website to complete it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Huntress Managed EDR vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 8% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 7% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 6% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 6% of the time

More Adlumin Security Operations Competitors

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 11% of the time

CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 3% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

December 2025

Download Adlumin Security Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

January 2026

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Also Known As

Adlumin Cybersecurity Platform

Field Effect Covalence

Overview

Adlumin Security Operations offers comprehensive security management solutions designed for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity infrastructure and detect threats effectively.

Adlumin Security Operations provides advanced cybersecurity capabilities that focus on improving threat detection and incident response. Its innovative technology addresses security challenges, helping organizations monitor, detect, and actively respond to potential threats in real-time. By leveraging machine learning and automated systems, it ensures scalability and adaptability to the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.

What Are the Key Features of Adlumin Security Operations?

Automated Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning to identify threats swiftly.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides continuous monitoring across networks.
Incident Response: Streamlines processes for faster response to threats.
Compliance Management: Offers tools to ensure regulatory compliance.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Expect?

Enhanced Security: Reduces risks by identifying threats promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes the cost of incident handling.
Scalability: Adapts to organization growth and increasing data volume.
Peace of Mind: Achieves compliance and regulatory standards effectively.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, Adlumin Security Operations is implemented to ensure robust protection of sensitive data and to maintain regulatory compliance. Its adaptability makes it suitable for diverse business environments, offering tailored security measures that address specific industry requirements.

N-able

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

Sample Customers

Courthouse News Service, Maschoff Brennan, Sky Lakes Medical Center, Tooele County School District, Southern Oregon ESD, CNB Bank & Trust, Ogden City, Southeast Financial Credit Union (SEFCU), Utah State Bar, Financial Plus Credit Union, Kelly Community, United Southern Bank of Kentucky (USBKY)

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Huntress, CrowdStrike, Field Effect and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.