Adobe Experience Manager vs OpenText Documentum Content Management comparison

Adobe and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Adobe is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.4. Adobe holds a 3.6% mindshare in ECM, compared to OpenText’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Adobe Experience Manager

Read 29 Adobe Experience Manager reviews

3,864 Views
1,391 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Documentum Content...

Read 32 OpenText Documentum Content Management reviews

4,086 Views
3,555 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

OpenText Documentum Content...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Adobe Experience Manager and OpenText Documentum are prominent contenders in the content management solutions category. AEM often claims an edge due to its seamless integration capabilities with Adobe Marketing Cloud, beneficial for comprehensive digital marketing, while Documentum excels in secure document management and robust metadata handling.

Features: AEM offers digital asset management, integration with Adobe products, and user-generated content capabilities. Its structure supports diverse marketing needs with DAM and analytics integration, and users value its search and asset management features. Documentum focuses on secure document management with versioning, security, and integration with external systems. It's recognized for strong process management and metadata handling, vital for compliance-driven industries.

Room for Improvement: AEM needs to address high costs, customization complexity, and ROI delays. Users suggest enhancing scalability, pricing transparency, and technical support response. Cloud transition issues and adapting lightweight frameworks are noted. Documentum users express the need for improved user interfaces, simpler integration, and better cost structures, especially regarding licensing. Suggestions include enhanced cloud support, streamlined workflows, and better documentation and training.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AEM provides deployment flexibility with cloud and on-premises options, with users acknowledging its customer service despite slow responses. Transitioning to the cloud presents challenges. Documentum shares similar deployment flexibility but is critiqued for performance at a large scale and a need for better documentation and user training. Customer support is considered adequate but with scope for enhancement in cloud transition support.

Pricing and ROI: AEM is associated with higher costs, positioning it well for larger enterprises with significant ROI potential through integration and automation features, though precise cost management is required. Documentum also incurs high costs with licensing and cloud-related pricing concerns. Some organizations find its pricing competitive, while others highlight the need for cost efficiency, particularly for smaller deployments or in government sectors. Both solutions offer ROI potential through efficient content management and deployment processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (1st), Enterprise Social Software (4th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (1st)

OpenText Documentum Content...

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Experience Manager is 3.6%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum Content Management is 7.2%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Documentum Content Management	7.2%
Adobe Experience Manager	3.6%
Other	89.2%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Hilax Chamberlain

Digital Marketing Manager at Ford Motor Company

Centralized content management has unified our digital channels and delivers consistent experiences

Adobe Experience Manager offers enterprise-level digital assets management and very robust customization, brand value consistency, and omnichannel delivery. It saves development and maintenance time. The digital asset management and omnichannel delivery features have benefited my team by managing our digital assets, ensuring brand consistency, and enabling us to deliver customized content easily to our clients. Organizing and obtaining information from results is beneficial. Strengthening our online experience as a brand is valuable. Easy integration with other Adobe services improves productivity and provides a smooth experience. Adobe Experience Manager has positively impacted my organization by enabling component and page reuse, which reduces application size. It saves manual effort for maintaining all applications, improves traffic, and ensures consistency across all our applications. It provides better security, scalability, and makes our applications more robust.

Read full review

Federica Camaldo

Consultant In Risk Management and Performance Improvemenf at Deloitte Risk Advisory

User finds integration useful but seeks improvement in interface intuitiveness

I am satisfied with OpenText Documentum so far; it has great integration capabilities. The connection with our API and SAP is useful, as you can use their SAP interface. The key point that my company decided to go with OpenText Documentum is mostly because you can integrate it with many other tools such as Salesforce.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Adobe Experience Manager offers several best features, including user-friendliness and a more secure platform than any other content management systems I have worked with."

"Adobe Experience Manager has made document management smoother because many people use Adobe, making it simpler for me to modify and resend PDF documents."

"Adobe Experience Manager is pretty stable."

"The search capability in Adobe Experience Manager is superior, as search capabilities are determined by the metadata, and it also has metadata automation using AI."

"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website."

"It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"The best feature is the experience fragment; if you want to replicate content across multiple websites with 1,000 or 20,000 pages, this feature helps accomplish it in a fraction of seconds."

More Adobe Experience Manager pros

"The most impactful thing is the size, which is almost 25 TB."

"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."

"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."

"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."

"The most valuable feature is the management."

"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."

"OpenText Documentum is a robust choice for enterprise-level document management."

"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."

More OpenText Documentum Content Management pros

Cons

"Bug troubleshooting is challenging and requires developer expertise."

"The pricing and setup cost for Adobe Experience Manager is a bit higher compared to different content management tools."

"Many people complain about the price as it's one of the most expensive tools."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"I assigned a rating of eight because there are certain limitations we must consider, and there are restrictions in Adobe Experience Manager that we cannot resolve."

"I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

More Adobe Experience Manager cons

"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."

"The BPM side should be improved."

"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."

"The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant."

"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."

"The interface of OpenText Documentum could be more intuitive; sometimes it is hard to find where the information is located."

"The user interface can be improved."

"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."

More OpenText Documentum Content Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's really costly."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"The price is considered affordable now."

"It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad."

"It is quite an expensive product."

"The product is expensive."

"OpenText Documentum's pricing is good."

"OpenText Documentum has announced a new licensing model, which could be more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?

It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?

Adobe Experience Manager could be improved by making it more reliable for all developers to access, rather than restricting access to a certified pool of resources or developers. We also have anoth...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?

Adobe Experience Manager manages most of our websites, and content management is conducted exclusively through the AEM platform. Whenever we need to publish a new page, blog, or podcast, we access ...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?

The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?

The interface of OpenText Documentum could be more intuitive; sometimes it is hard to find where the information is located.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText Documentum?

We are using it to archive the information about our sales.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

SharePoint vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Drupal vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Adobe Experience Manager Competitors

SharePoint vs OpenText Documentum Content Management

Compared 22% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Documentum Content Management

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs OpenText Documentum Content Management

Compared 8% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs OpenText Documentum Content Management

Compared 8% of the time

IBM ECM vs OpenText Documentum Content Management

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Documentum Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager

February 2026

Download Adobe Experience Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Documentum Content Management

January 2026

OpenText Documentum Content Management report

Download OpenText Documentum Content Management product report

Also Known As

Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud, Adobe CQ5

Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform

Overview

Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.

Adobe

OpenText Documentum Content Management provides centralized document management with strong security, advanced metadata management, and seamless integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, aiding businesses in overseeing content effectively.

OpenText Documentum Content Management is known for its strong integration capabilities, especially with systems such as SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle E-Business Suite, facilitating effective document management. Its strengths include advanced security features, comprehensive metadata management, and robust support for lifecycle and workflow management. The platform's scalability and business process automation capabilities support industries with large volumes of content. It is adaptable for various sectors, including healthcare, banking, insurance, and government, providing document storage, sharing, and collaboration functionalities. While the intuitive automation engine enhances workflows, users have noted that improvements are needed in UI design, performance, and integration with additional systems. Concerns about cloud transition security, high costs, outdated workflows, and complex metadata management indicate areas for development. Supports are sought for AI integrations, improved cloud functionality, and efficient documentation.

What are the key features of OpenText Documentum Content Management?

Security: Robust security features ensure content protection.
Metadata Management: Advanced handling of metadata enhances organization.
Integration: Seamless connectivity with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive support for document lifecycles.
Automation Engine: Streamlined workflows through intuitive automation.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Improved Efficiency: Centralized management reduces redundancies.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps meet industry standards easily.
Scalability: Accommodates growing content volumes effortlessly.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates document sharing and teamwork.
Secure Cloud Transition: Maintains security while adopting cloud services.

Industries such as healthcare, banking, and government use OpenText Documentum Content Management for document-centric processes, ensuring regulatory compliance and facilitating collaboration. With Captiva enhancing OCR and batch scanning, it is crucial for managing high-quality documentation and compliance efforts across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Metra

Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management

February 2026

Free Report: Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.