Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Workfront vs Airtable comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Adobe Workfront enhances efficiency, collaboration, and productivity, offering ROI through reduced costs, real-time updates, and improved user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.1
Airtable's automation enhanced efficiency and cost savings, eliminating manual tasks and showcasing its potential beyond basic functions.
I can automate the process so it automatically populates data into the Airtable base and performs any necessary calculations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Adobe Workfront customer service is praised for responsiveness and expertise, despite occasional delays or costly advanced support.
Sentiment score
6.0
Airtable's support is responsive and polite, but response times vary, with better service for enterprise clients.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Adobe Workfront scales well for various organizations, managing users and projects smoothly with high performance and adaptable scalability.
Sentiment score
6.1
Airtable handles small to medium data well, but faces limitations with large sets, ideal for mid-sized structured projects.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Adobe Workfront is generally stable, with minimal downtime, quick issue resolutions, and requires modern browsers for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
8.3
Airtable is generally reliable, with high ratings, though some users note downtime and speed issues with extensive usage.
 

Room For Improvement

Adobe Workfront needs faster updates, user-friendly design, improved integrations, flexible customization, and better documentation for enhanced usability.
Airtable users seek improved API call limits, data storage, loading speeds, flexible pricing, automation, interfaces, documentation, and tutorials.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
If they show step-by-step guides for automations, this will help them attract more clients who are willing to learn and use their system.
 

Setup Cost

Adobe Workfront pricing varies by license type, with significant subscription fees but potential discounts for existing Adobe customers.
Airtable offers flexible pricing by plan and user count, starting with a free plan and additional costs for advanced features.
 

Valuable Features

Adobe Workfront enhances collaboration and decision-making with customizable templates, workflow management, and strong integration supporting agile and waterfall methodologies.
Airtable offers user-friendly features, automation, no-code apps, intuitive navigation, seamless interface, and extensive integration for efficient task management.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
Everybody has a particular base for different purposes, so you add information to those bases, and anybody can access it at any point in time anywhere in the world.
It was effective for easy reporting and data on our user feedback.
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront
Ranking in Project Management Software
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (1st)
Airtable
Ranking in Project Management Software
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Product Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.2%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Airtable is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent
Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.
Ashwini Ramanisankar - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, quick implementation, and effortless database creation
The interfaces provided by the company have certainly undergone significant improvements since their earlier versions. The growth and progress have been remarkable. I have personally shared numerous feedback points and observed the prompt implementation of changes within a few months, which is highly commendable. However, I must admit that I have encountered several challenges with their interfaces. In terms of the interface, there are certain improvements I would suggest. For instance, a global search feature is currently absent, which would greatly enhance usability. Additionally, incorporating a search function within automation would be highly beneficial. The current limitation of fifty automation per base is insufficient for our needs and could be expanded. Moreover, there is a need for a longer native time delay in automation to allow for more flexible syncing. Currently, the syncing time is set at approximately three to five minutes, which could be increased for smoother operations.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
35%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
9%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?
I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?
Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...
What needs improvement with Workfront?
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems. The current report is not providing the expected side-by-side comparison of capabilities,...
What do you like most about Airtable?
The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements.
What needs improvement with Airtable?
I haven't used it in a while, so I cannot really provide specific areas that need improvement.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
Cole Haan, Expedia, BuzzFeed, Medium, Shopify, Box, JetBlue
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Airtable and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.