No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon AWS vs Stratoscale [EOL] comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Stratoscale are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Stratoscale users who would recommend it.
Amazon AWS
Read 260 Amazon AWS reviews
  • 39,609 Views
  • 24,954 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Stratoscale [EOL]
Read 3 Stratoscale [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Stratoscale [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Report (Updated: August 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
    August 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Amazon AWS
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    260
    Ranking in other categories
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (2nd), PaaS Clouds (2nd)
    Stratoscale [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.6
    Number of Reviews
    3
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Asif Meem - PeerSpot reviewer
    Asif Meem
    Senior Machine Learning Engineer at sportsbet
    Managed cloud services have helped accelerate experiments with flexible configuration options
    Sometimes the costs associated with spinning up a service, especially managed services, have implications. For example, if I create a Glue job, that will create S3 buckets and other resources that have cost implications, but once I clean up a Glue job, it does not delete the other accessory resources. Sometimes, I have to go hunting for what resources Amazon AWS might have provisioned and how it is costing behind the scenes. It can be complex depending on your level of expertise. It is not as easy to get started, especially when it comes to secure practices. Amazon AWS is more hands-on than other platforms.
    Read full review
    RB
    Robert Bush
    Server and Storage Platform Team Lead at Invesco US
    I like the automation and self-healing features
    SDDC. Speed to market. Automation and self-healing. Oracle engine. Google and Azure API. Still implementing.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "We pretty much like everything and we are excited about the seamless capability the EC2 service is offering."
    "The most valuable feature is the availability, as we work in different availability zones."
    "AWS has reduced our costs and maintenance requirements."
    "AWS is effortless to configure and has high availability."
    "Amazon AWS is very, very stable."
    "Amazon AWS has good performance and easy management."
    "Amazon AWS is a stable solution."
    "Having a cloud available has been great; it makes things faster and easier and the deployment is pretty quick and very straightforward."
    More Amazon AWS pros
    "We efficiently move resources between major engineering projects."
    "We hired a third company to stress test the system and it was above and beyond in terms of what we expected."
    "Automation and self-healing."
     

    Cons

    "It would be nice to be able to test Direct Connect without having to pay a line."
    "User personalization and robotic process automation services need to be mature enough."
    "Some of the security features require extra configuration to achieve that."
    "A bit costlier than Microsoft Azure based on computer per hour and outbound bandwidth."
    "AWS has room for improvement on the Kubernetes side."
    "It would be better if there was a way to see which components were still on. We have some situations where I forget that some components are turned on. We forget some components are on, and we only see that these components are on when we see the bill at the end of the month. It would also be better if AWS had specialized firewalls or integrations with leading products. For example, a specialized firewall with content filtering. We were looking for some firewall tools, and we saw that AWS doesn't have any specialized firewall tools in its services portfolio. So, we are looking for other tools like FortKnox, Forcepoint, and Check Point because we didn't find the solutions in AWS services."
    "We have had several issues with the products and services but as of now, there are no good alternatives."
    "The solution could always be further improved on the commercial side of things. Amazon Web Services are not cheap. It would be ideal if it was less expensive for the customer."
    More Amazon AWS cons
    "We never had an issue with stability, but when we implemented the product, there were certain places where we weren't sure that they are completely aligned with our goals, in terms of how we use the system to get there."
    "Oracle engine. Google and Azure API."
    "Initial setup was complex at the beginning as the system was still lacking some important features, while every new release required a full reinstallation."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "I rate the tool's pricing a six to seven out of ten."
    "I think they've done a pretty good job with their pricing."
    "The solution is on a subscription-based model, and it is pay-as-you-go. The price could be cheaper."
    "The price of the Virtual Desktop service from Amazon AWS could improve, it is more expensive than competitors. The pricing model we are using is pay-as-you-go. You only pay for what you use."
    "I find that Amazon AWS is expensive."
    "It's expensive."
    "It can get quite pricey at times."
    "The price for AWS is good."
    More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Comparison Review

    it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user8586
    Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
    Aug 14, 2013
    Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
    Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
    Read full review
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    12%
    Manufacturing Company
    10%
    Construction Company
    9%
    Outsourcing Company
    7%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business131
    Midsize Enterprise48
    Large Enterprise120
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
    Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
    See all answers
    How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?
    How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...
    See all answers
    Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure
    We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS Logo
    Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS
    Compared 21% of the time
    Dell ObjectScale vs Amazon AWS Logo
    Dell ObjectScale vs Amazon AWS
    Compared 6% of the time
    SAP Business Technology Platform vs Amazon AWS Logo
    SAP Business Technology Platform vs Amazon AWS
    Compared 6% of the time
    Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS Logo
    Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS
    Compared 4% of the time
    Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS Logo
    Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS
    Compared 3% of the time
    More Amazon AWS Competitors
    Alibaba Cloud vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Alibaba Cloud vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    VMware Software Defined Data Center vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    VMware Software Defined Data Center vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Google Firebase vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Google Firebase vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Microsoft Azure vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Microsoft Azure vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 8% of the time
    Scale Computing Platform vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Scale Computing Platform vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Stratoscale [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon AWS
    August 2026
    Amazon AWS reportDownload Amazon AWS product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
    August 2026
    Stratoscale [EOL] reportDownload Stratoscale [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Amazon Web Services, AWS
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Amazon AWS offers cloud services known for ease of use, scalability, and diverse services such as EC2, S3, and Lambda. Its pay-as-you-go pricing and robust security features make it a preferred choice for businesses managing growing demands efficiently.

    Amazon AWS provides a comprehensive ecosystem with services like EC2 for computing, S3 for storage, and Lambda for serverless computing. It emphasizes scalability and quick resource provisioning, allowing businesses to handle IT workloads, host websites, and manage analytics seamlessly. AWS integrates a wide range of services, enhancing flexibility and reliability while offering robust security and automated management to streamline operations.

    What are the most important features of Amazon AWS?
    • EC2: Offers scalable computing capacity in the cloud to manage business applications efficiently.
    • S3: Provides highly secure, durable, and scalable cloud storage solutions for data archiving and backup.
    • Lambda: Enables running code without provisioning or managing servers, improving application deployment.
    • Pricing: Employs a pay-as-you-go model, allowing cost-effective resource usage.
    • Security: Implements comprehensive security protocols to ensure data protection across services.
    What benefits should users look for in reviews?
    • Scalability: Supports business growth by easily scaling resources according to demand.
    • Integration: Offers seamless integration capabilities with numerous services, enhancing operational flexibility.
    • Performance: Provides stable and reliable performance for critical IT workloads and applications.
    • Management: Features automated management tools that reduce overhead and improve deployment efficiency.

    Amazon AWS is widely implemented across industries for cloud computing, infrastructure hosting, and data storage. Businesses in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors leverage AWS for running applications, hosting analytics databases, and deploying scalable solutions. By utilizing tools like EC2, S3, and Lambda, they ensure flexibility and security in infrastructure management and data applications, meeting diverse operational needs effectively.

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Stratoscale is the cloud infrastructure company, allowing enterprises to deploy an AWS-compatible region in any data center. Stratoscale Symphony, can be deployed in minutes on commodity x86 servers, creating an Amazon Web Services (AWS) compatible region and offering AWS-compatible services including EC2, S3, EBS, RDS and Kubernetes. Stratoscale was named a “Cool Vendor in Servers and Virtualization” by Gartner and raised over $70M from leading investors including: Battery Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners, Cisco, Intel, Qualcomm Ventures, SanDisk and Leslie Ventures.
    Stratoscale
     

    Sample Customers

    Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.
    SanDisk, Orange, Merck, NTT, Troy Cable, Bezeq, Tieto, Neen, Ofek Cloud Technologies, APA IT, Netkom, SOS Surveillance, Futong, WeBank, Team Netsol
    Buyer's Guide
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
    August 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: August 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.