

Google Workspace and Amazon WorkMail compete in the cloud-based communication and collaboration software category. Google Workspace appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and superior real-time collaboration tools, while Amazon WorkMail is noted for its reliable email services integrated deeply with AWS.
Features: Google Workspace provides extensive scalability, seamless integration with other tools, and is ideal for collaboration with services like Drive and Calendar included in basic packages. It offers robust real-time collaboration, document sharing, and security. Amazon WorkMail is reliable and integrates well with AWS services, offering a cloud-managed email solution, though with fewer features compared to Google Workspace.
Room for Improvement: Google Workspace could improve its user interface, user controls, and Outlook integration, and addresses occasional system outages and calendar sync issues. Amazon WorkMail receives feedback about high user costs and some integration limitations, along with a need for better regional support and enhanced analytics and reporting features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Google Workspace and Amazon WorkMail support public cloud deployment. Google Workspace is straightforward to set up with extensive online resources, although direct support can occasionally be lacking. Amazon WorkMail has simple deployment and customer service, but users mention needing faster support and better documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Google Workspace presents a balanced but potentially high price point, offering strong ROI through productivity improvements, and provides discounts for educational and non-profit organizations. Amazon WorkMail has lower cost-effectiveness and higher user fees, which can deter budget-conscious customers, but its free tier provides good value for startups and small businesses.
We have sent some emails and they have responded promptly, so we are satisfied.
In the past, we experienced a problem with automatic emails being blocked, and the support team resolved the issue quickly.
I sent several complaints and what they replied to me was that I should have dealt with the problem with the provider of my credit card.
With Gemini, I was charged for a year without receiving any guidance on its usage.
I do not have any concerns regarding the scalability of Amazon WorkMail, as we are sending about 40,000 to 50,000 emails per day, doing both transactional and batch with a queuing mechanism internally.
It supports around 2,500 users in our company, and this scalability assists us in maintaining our infrastructure.
Scalability involves another configuration with a new email configuration, involving some authentication issues with Microsoft Outlook.
If webinars were provided and universities were promoted with webinars, people are going to attend them.
The stability of Google Workspace is excellent and very solid.
With Microsoft now that we are using, we have a security system by which every now and then you have to change your password, and whenever you try to access multiple times to the same email from different devices or many times in the same day, they will ask you for a code that you have to insert.
This stability is crucial to us because it ensures we do not lose communication or connection while using messaging and accessing files.
The new integration was implemented last September, and we are facing some issues with OAuth 2.0 authentication.
It is hard to find categories and folders in Teams.
The security functionalities are similar to those in competitors like Active Directory, but they could be optimized for stronger security features.
I have heard that compared to other providers, it is considerably cheaper.
The current cost is approximately seven to ten euros per user per month.
I find the feature that checks how many emails have been successfully sent and how many of them have been opened very useful, because in our application, we know the usage of the emails.
The ability to share documents with students and assign them things and correct them in real time has been beneficial.
The valuable features include the email service, email updates, and Google Drive.
These tools enhance productivity by allowing us to edit the same file at the same time, making collaboration much smoother.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Workspace | 16.0% |
| Amazon WorkMail | 7.4% |
| Other | 76.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 64 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
Amazon WorkMail is a secure, managed business email and calendar service with support for existing desktop and mobile email client applications. Amazon WorkMail gives users the ability to seamlessly access their email, contacts, and calendars using the client application of their choice, including Microsoft Outlook, native iOS and Android email applications, any client application supporting the IMAP protocol, or directly through a web browser. You can integrate Amazon WorkMail with your existing corporate directory, use email journaling to meet compliance requirements, and control both the keys that encrypt your data and the location in which your data is stored. You can also set up interoperability with Microsoft Exchange Server, and programmatically manage users, groups, and resources using the Amazon WorkMail SDK.
Similar to G Suite, all Google Workspace plans provide a custom email for your business and include collaboration tools like Gmail, Calendar, Meet, Chat, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Forms, Sites, and more.
As we’ve evolved G Suite into a more integrated experience across our communication and collaboration tools, we’ve rebranded to Google Workspace to more accurately represent the product vision.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.