Apiiro vs Invicti comparison

Apiiro and Invicti are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Apiiro is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Invicti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7. Apiiro holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to Invicti’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,576 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti

Read 30 Invicti reviews

2,738 Views
2,081 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Apiiro

Invicti

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and Apiiro are major players in the web application security arena. Invicti leads in pricing and user support feedback, while Apiiro dominates with its comprehensive features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Invicti's automated vulnerability scanning, detailed reporting, and efficiency in identifying vulnerabilities make it a strong player in security maintenance. Apiiro sets itself apart with an integrated risk management approach, offering broad visibility and a proactive risk detection system, appealing to users seeking overall risk management depth.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could enhance its offering through in-depth analysis features, more flexible integrations, and enriched analytical capabilities. Apiiro could benefit from streamlined workflows, advanced dashboard customization, and improved user interface to optimize user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is recognized for its easy deployment and supportive customer service framework. Apiiro involves a slightly complex installation process but excels with comprehensive guidance and continuous user support post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is favored for its cost-efficiency and clear ROI due to its advantageous pricing strategy. Apiiro requires a greater upfront financial commitment but provides a rich feature set, delivering significant long-term returns and strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. Invicti Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. Invicti

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Ranking in API Security

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (13th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

15th

Ranking in API Security

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Invicti	1.5%
Apiiro	0.8%
Other	97.7%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Proactive scanning measures and realistic audit recommendations enhance development focus

Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment. This feature helps us focus on priorities and prioritize the development team's effort, integrating seamlessly with DevOps to facilitate proactive scans of environments. Invicti also provides audit recommendations that are quite realistic, making it easy to discuss plans with developers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Invicti is a good product, and its API testing is also good."

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"The scanner and the result generator are valuable features for us."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."

"Its ability to crawl a web application is quite different than another similar scanner."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"Asset scanning could be better. Once, it couldn't scan assets, and the issue was strange. The price doesn't fit the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

See all answers

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

The main concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 22% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 18% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 15% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 13% of the time

Wiz Code vs Apiiro

Compared 9% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 18% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

October 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

September 2025

Download Invicti product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Netsparker

Overview

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. Invicti

September 2025

Free Report: Apiiro vs. Invicti

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. Invicti and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. Invicti report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best API Security vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.