No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis vs JupiterOne comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.7
Armis streamlines asset management, boosting efficiency and cost savings with faster resolution, threat reduction, and reclaimed software capacity.
Sentiment score
7.1
JupiterOne enhances asset management by automating processes, substantially reducing security team time and audit preparation significantly.
There is a 98% reduction in vulnerability workloads, enabling focus only on high-risk issues.
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
I have seen a return on investment with Armis, as it definitely improved remediation with fewer employees.
Owner with 201-500 employees
After implementation, that dropped to about three to four hours, saving nearly eighty percent of manual effort in that area.
Product Manager at Zidio development
With JupiterOne, I have reduced the number of employees needed due to increased automation, which has also led to significant cost savings.
Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Using JupiterOne has helped me reduce my total time by almost twenty percent.
Manager Dev Ops at Merck
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Armis customer service is responsive and effective, with some delays; onboarding praised, but timely responses vary in consistency.
Sentiment score
7.4
JupiterOne provides responsive support with 24-hour ticket responses, dedicated onboarding, and a robust support network for seamless integration.
I have not faced challenges with Armis support, as pre-sales engineers have been helpful.
Technical Manager at Truvisor
I would rate it ten out of ten.
Director /Founder at Touchstone Machine Tap
Their team provided dedicated assistance for connecting integrations like AWS and GitHub, which made the first two to three weeks much smoother than expected.
Product Manager at Zidio development
Customer support for JupiterOne is good, and I find it quite strong, especially for enterprise use.
Manager Dev Ops at Merck
Customer support is responsive, typically answering within less than twenty-four hours of when I ask a question.
Sr Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Armis is highly rated for scalability, efficiently accommodating diverse user environments despite occasional performance slowdowns during deployments.
Sentiment score
6.9
JupiterOne offers scalable asset management, though complexity at enterprise scale may affect performance; improved alerts are needed.
As a SaaS platform, it is highly scalable.
Sr. Engineer at Zensar Technologies
Customers typically enjoy the solution and do not face any issues both before deployment during the POC and after deployment once they release the PO and get the implementation done.
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
It is very scalable and easy to scale, as I also rated it eight on a scale of one to ten.
Technology And Digitization Lead at JLL
It handles diverse daily data, supports multi-cloud environments, and accommodates thousands of users and applications.
Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Our organization has grown from a few cloud resource accounts to hundreds of accounts and thousands of resources without needing to deploy additional JupiterOne infrastructure.
Manager Dev Ops at Merck
The scalability of JupiterOne is quite good. It is built to handle enterprise-scale infrastructures with thousands of assets across multiple cloud environments.
Product Manager at Zidio development
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Armis is generally stable and reliable, rated highly for stability, though occasional glitches are quickly resolved.
Sentiment score
8.7
JupiterOne is highly stable with 99% uptime, notable asset accuracy, and receives strong reliability and stability ratings from users.
 

Room For Improvement

Armis requires improved cloud features, integration, AI capabilities, and affordability, facing implementation challenges and limited geographic reach.
JupiterOne users face challenges with performance, integration, and cost, seeking better usability, data accuracy, and enhanced features.
Armis cannot be used as a standalone solution and should be integrated with other solutions.
Technical Manager at Truvisor
The needed improvements I see include implementing cloud features, as the market, particularly in Brazil, is moving to cloud environments to reduce costs and time spent on upgrades and server management.
IDM Consultant at GCA Consultoria de Informática Ltda
It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities.
Technology And Digitization Lead at JLL
Skills development is another important area that needs attention, as teams require training in graph-based query language to effectively handle large transaction datasets.
Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic.
Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
Product Manager at Zidio development
 

Setup Cost

Armis pricing is seen as average to slightly expensive but justified by features, with manageable setup and licensing costs.
Armis pricing is average, neither cheaper nor more expensive than other solutions.
Director /Founder at Touchstone Machine Tap
The price is not very high.
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
Armis is slightly on the expensive range based on what I have observed.
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Overall, it is not cheap, but for what it does, it is a good value.
Product Manager at Zidio development
 

Valuable Features

Armis enhances asset visibility, risk management, and security with real-time monitoring, agentless discovery, and a user-friendly interface.
JupiterOne enhances security with asset management, automated queries, and integrations, providing insights and streamlining audit readiness.
Armis is very easy to implement due to its agentless design and offers a granular level of visibility for all assets in the network.
Director /Founder at Touchstone Machine Tap
It assesses open vulnerabilities, provides traffic flow insights, integrates with ticketing workflows, and aggregates security solutions like Active Directory and EDR.
Sr. Engineer at Zensar Technologies
Armis provides full visibility on OT devices and in the medical industry for devices such as ECG machines, X-rays, and infusion pumps.
Technical Manager at Truvisor
The key feature I rely on most in my daily work is the graph-based asset relationship mapping JupiterOne provides.
Manager Dev Ops at Merck
The ease of using queries and the new MCP feature has helped me because sometimes I would have difficulty writing the queries, but the AI within the query field in JupiterOne suggests if the query is incorrect and proposes a new query.
Sr Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
One of the best features JupiterOne offers is blast radius, being able to see assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by any cyber incident or to see how some assets communicate with other assets and some do not communicate with other assets.
Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
JupiterOne
Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (49th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (20th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Armis is 11.2%, down from 22.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JupiterOne is 5.5%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Armis11.2%
JupiterOne5.5%
Other83.3%
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
Comprehensive visibility has transformed how I secure and prioritize risks across connected devices
The best features Armis offers include vulnerability management for OT and IoT devices, providing risk prioritization, and offering protection across all connected assets. Armis cyber exposure management is very good as it provides continuous visibility, risk prioritization, and protection across all connected assets. Armis has positively impacted my organization by providing asset discovery for both OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility for OT and IoT devices along with vulnerability information, including the CVE number so that I can fix the threat on OT and IoT devices. Most of the time, focus is on IT devices and attention is not paid to OT and IoT. Armis facilitates focus on OT and IoT as well, closing the gap that often exists. Armis makes life easier for customers by providing visibility of OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility. Armis has a user-friendly interface, is very useful for customers, provides quality support, and has a global presence allowing easy access for both customers and Armis representatives. The console is user-friendly. Armis handles compliance requirements in my industry very well and is useful.
Tarun Goswami_ - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Manager at Zidio development
Unified cloud visibility has simplified compliance reporting and improved incident response
Regarding performance and speed scenarios for JupiterOne, queries sometimes take too long, especially when dealing with large datasets or complex graph relationships that can slow down significantly. There is also a steep learning curve, as J1QL, their query language, is powerful but requires time to learn. New users struggle initially, and better onboarding tutorials are needed. Rate limiting issues can be frustrating, as API rate limits sometimes cause problems. Price transparency for JupiterOne is an area for improvement. The price is not publicly listed, so you have to contact sales for smaller teams or startups, which becomes a barrier. Another issue is alert noise, as sometimes too many alerts are generated. Better filtering and prioritization are needed so that critical issues do not get lost. JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
University
7%
Construction Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Armis?
For improvement, I suggest adopting more automation and making the solution AI-enabled. If Armis can be autonomous, it will be more useful for customers. If it can respond to threats in real-time, ...
What is your primary use case for Armis?
My main use case is to identify all the devices in my network, connect to them, and identify the exposure alerts for those devices. I only have to discover all the devices, connect to them, and ide...
What advice do you have for others considering Armis?
I advise that if you want cybersecurity, then you can mostly explore this tool. Armis is very useful. Instead of other tools, it will be very helpful and the AI feature is very great.
What needs improvement with JupiterOne?
One improvement I would suggest for JupiterOne is to make the platform's remediation workflow more tightly integrated with DevOps pipelines. For example, when JupiterOne identifies a critical misco...
What is your primary use case for JupiterOne?
My main use case for JupiterOne is as a cybersecurity platform that I use for cyber asset management, security operations, and compliance. For example, I use JupiterOne for cloud asset visibility a...
What advice do you have for others considering JupiterOne?
My advice for others looking into using JupiterOne is to utilize it as it helps in monitoring cloud resources and is better for security and compliance purposes. I would rate this review a ten out ...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. JupiterOne and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.