

Find out in this report how the two Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
There is a 98% reduction in vulnerability workloads, enabling focus only on high-risk issues.
I have seen a return on investment with Armis, as it definitely improved remediation with fewer employees.
After implementation, that dropped to about three to four hours, saving nearly eighty percent of manual effort in that area.
With JupiterOne, I have reduced the number of employees needed due to increased automation, which has also led to significant cost savings.
Using JupiterOne has helped me reduce my total time by almost twenty percent.
I have not faced challenges with Armis support, as pre-sales engineers have been helpful.
I would rate it ten out of ten.
Their team provided dedicated assistance for connecting integrations like AWS and GitHub, which made the first two to three weeks much smoother than expected.
Customer support for JupiterOne is good, and I find it quite strong, especially for enterprise use.
Customer support is responsive, typically answering within less than twenty-four hours of when I ask a question.
As a SaaS platform, it is highly scalable.
Customers typically enjoy the solution and do not face any issues both before deployment during the POC and after deployment once they release the PO and get the implementation done.
It is very scalable and easy to scale, as I also rated it eight on a scale of one to ten.
It handles diverse daily data, supports multi-cloud environments, and accommodates thousands of users and applications.
Our organization has grown from a few cloud resource accounts to hundreds of accounts and thousands of resources without needing to deploy additional JupiterOne infrastructure.
The scalability of JupiterOne is quite good. It is built to handle enterprise-scale infrastructures with thousands of assets across multiple cloud environments.
Armis cannot be used as a standalone solution and should be integrated with other solutions.
The needed improvements I see include implementing cloud features, as the market, particularly in Brazil, is moving to cloud environments to reduce costs and time spent on upgrades and server management.
It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities.
Skills development is another important area that needs attention, as teams require training in graph-based query language to effectively handle large transaction datasets.
The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic.
JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
Armis pricing is average, neither cheaper nor more expensive than other solutions.
The price is not very high.
Armis is slightly on the expensive range based on what I have observed.
Overall, it is not cheap, but for what it does, it is a good value.
Armis is very easy to implement due to its agentless design and offers a granular level of visibility for all assets in the network.
It assesses open vulnerabilities, provides traffic flow insights, integrates with ticketing workflows, and aggregates security solutions like Active Directory and EDR.
Armis provides full visibility on OT devices and in the medical industry for devices such as ECG machines, X-rays, and infusion pumps.
The key feature I rely on most in my daily work is the graph-based asset relationship mapping JupiterOne provides.
The ease of using queries and the new MCP feature has helped me because sometimes I would have difficulty writing the queries, but the AI within the query field in JupiterOne suggests if the query is incorrect and proposes a new query.
One of the best features JupiterOne offers is blast radius, being able to see assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by any cyber incident or to see how some assets communicate with other assets and some do not communicate with other assets.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Armis | 11.2% |
| JupiterOne | 5.5% |
| Other | 83.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Armis is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution used for continuous monitoring and threat detection across IT and IoT devices. It excels in spotting vulnerabilities, managing device compliance, and tracking assets to enhance security protocols and network management. Key features include real-time threat detection, comprehensive visibility, and granular risk assessments. Armis boosts organizational productivity by streamlining workflows and enhancing operational accuracy.
JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.
JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
What are JupiterOne's key features?In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.
We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.