Aruba Remote Access Points vs Citrix Gateway comparison

Citrix Gateway and Aruba Remote Access Points are both popular solutions for remote access. Aruba Remote Access Points seem to have the upper hand because of their superior performance and ease of deployment.

Features: Citrix Gateway offers robust security features including integrated VPN and application layer firewall. Aruba Remote Access Points provide seamless integration with existing infrastructure and high-speed connectivity. While Citrix Gateway's comprehensive feature set is noteworthy, Aruba's emphasis on performance and ease of use gives it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Citrix Gateway users report the need for a more streamlined setup process and better documentation. Aruba Remote Access Points users want enhanced reporting capabilities and reduced costs. While both products have areas needing improvement, Citrix’s setup complexity is a more common concern.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Gateway deployment is noted for being complex and time-consuming, though its customer service receives positive feedback. Aruba Remote Access Points are generally easier to deploy and come with comprehensive support. The ease of deployment for Aruba, combined with strong customer service, makes it a preferred choice for many users.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix Gateway is often seen as cost-effective with a good ROI due to its extensive features. However, Aruba Remote Access Points, despite being more expensive, are considered worth the investment due to their superior performance. Users generally feel that Aruba provides better overall value despite the higher setup cost.