Asana vs Planview ProjectPlace comparison

Asana and Planview ProjectPlace are project management tools competing in the project management category. Asana seems to have the upper hand in pricing flexibility while ProjectPlace excels in collaboration capabilities.

Features: Asana offers intuitive task management, customizable dashboards, and real-time updates, making it suitable for users who need flexibility and integration with various software solutions. It provides a streamlined interface for task tracking and team communication. ProjectPlace is known for its robust collaboration and project tracking features, offering Kanban boards, detailed project views, and resource management capabilities, suitable for complex operational and strategic projects.

Room for Improvement: Asana faces challenges in enhancing workflows, dashboard functionalities, and notification settings. Users suggest improvements in integration and video communication options. ProjectPlace needs stronger integration with other Planview tools, an improved user interface, and more comprehensive resource planning. Users request more dynamic financial management and reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Asana supports various cloud deployment models, including Hybrid, Public, and On-premises, offering flexibility for different needs. While customer support is generally satisfactory, some users report delayed responses, resorting to community support for resolutions. ProjectPlace, primarily offering Public Cloud deployment, is praised for ease of use, but its technical support has room for improvement due to slower response times.

Pricing and ROI: Asana's competitive pricing model includes a free version, catering to various business sizes, and its ROI is viewed positively despite some perceiving it as slightly expensive. ProjectPlace, though costly with its FLEX licensing, offers extensive functionality, justifying its price for those using Planview's suite, with recognized ROI in project visibility and efficiency.