AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Druva inSync comparison

"It is the best product in the market for Office 365 backup, and our customers are satisfied with it."

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

"The most valuable features are the email backup and the SharePoint backup."

"I rate the overall solution a 9 out of 10."

"The recovery options in Microsoft 365 are not adequate and it does not help to recover data from the recycle bin that is older than 90 days. The solution has made us more efficient and helps to recover data that is older than 90 days."

"The SaaS feature of AvePoint Cloud Backup is very strong."

"The initial setup is super easy."

"It is a very good and stable solution...With AvePoint's support, our experience has been exceptional"

"One of the most valuable features is it is available on the cloud, so I do not need to make a firewall. Second, the backup speed is outstanding. The third thing is that the section policy is very good and gives you a lot of flexibility and granularity regarding what you need to back up."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It's incredibly fast."

"Users do not need to contact IT administrators to recover lost or deleted files. They can do it on their own, eliminating waiting time."

"You don't need a certified administrator to manage this product."

"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."

"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."

"It has a straightforward installation."

"Some customers choose other backup solutions because AvePoint is Office 365 and CRM backup system, but they have other backup needs for Azure and so on. Such customers often choose another backup solution instead of AvePoint."

"The configuration could be made easier."

"The component in the product that can be improved revolves around the area where the tool should focus on providing more of a custom touch to the policies."

"For improvement, AvePoint can provide details on how the tool's backup scope works."

"It would be beneficial to have a more optimal Google Backup for larger environments."

"It is challenging for small or medium-sized businesses to purchase it."

"The restoration could be faster."

"I would like to see improvements in the tool's initial seed. The initial seed of around 10 TB of SharePoint data took 45 days to complete."

"To make Druva inSync better, they can implement additional DLP."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"The speed could be better."

"The support team generally needs to be more proactive with technical and general suggestions."

"Druva inSync is very high in price. A general customer cannot afford this solution. Even if the product is good, people cannot afford such a high cost just for taking the backup. This is a recurring investment, and the customers have to pay for it every year. Druva is also yet to develop the channel and the channel or partner commitment."

"It would be good if bare metal backups were possible."

"The solution takes a lot of time during restoration."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"I would say that the pricing policy of the product is flexible and good."

"It costs a little bit more than other competitors in the market."

"I am not sure, but I believe that the cost is $7 USD per user."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The pricing part of the solution is based on a subscription model, which is based on the number of users or storage capacity."

"The platform is more expensive than other vendors."

"It is very good for many of my customers in the banking and finance segments. The price isn't a problem there, but in some other industries, people ask for a cheaper solution. When the price is an issue for the customer, we recommend Veeam, Metallic."

"It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"The pricing is thirty-five dollars per year or three dollars per month per user."

"The price is quite good, It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."

"Once you decide to go with this product the cost can be worked out with the vendor."

"The product is fairly priced, I would rate its pricing five out of ten."

"The pricing of Druva inSync is very high as compared to other cloud backup solutions."

"The pricing is good."