

Catchpoint and Azure Monitor are powerful monitoring tools in the performance monitoring category. Catchpoint is superior in real-time performance monitoring, whereas Azure Monitor excels in integration with Azure services and detailed analytics.
Features: Catchpoint offers extensive monitoring capabilities, a reliable alerting system, and user-centric performance metrics. Azure Monitor provides seamless integration with Azure services, robust analytics, and advanced diagnostics.
Room for Improvement: Catchpoint needs better integration capabilities, more flexible dashboards, and enhanced user customization. Azure Monitor requires improved alerting configurations, a simplified data querying process, and better documentation for easier navigation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support. Azure Monitor's deployment is more complex, but its integration with the Azure platform adds value despite occasional support responsiveness issues.
Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint has clear pricing and offers a quick ROI due to effective monitoring. Azure Monitor, though potentially more costly, offers significant value through its deep integration with Azure services, justifying the investment according to users.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
There have been fewer outages, and it is very easy to identify the issue of performance bottleneck through root cause analysis and insights.
Real-time monitoring of networks, websites, and apps gives insightful information which helps to make data-driven decisions.
We have seen a return on investment as we have fewer outages.
However, the second-line support is good.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
Catchpoint customer support is very helpful and proactive.
The customer support is always very friendly and responsive and always available twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week.
Customer support is available 24/7 and very proactive and responsive.
With APM, you can go heavy or you can go light. It just depends on what you want, what your use case is, and how reactive you want to be to system load or resilient to failure.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
Catchpoint's scalability is great as it grows with my organization's needs and can handle those needs very well.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
Catchpoint is stable as I have not experienced any lagging.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.
Dashboard customization and UX should be improved.
I would also add that the script recorder needs some work due to an update by Google, deprecating the use of the current solution.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
The cost is very effective and relatively competitive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost was very cost-effective and affordable.
Catchpoint's price is very cost-effective, but I don't know if it might be out of budget for a smaller organization working on a tight budget.
The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.
I also appreciate the ability to measure feature activity, see what types of devices they are on, follow specific use cases, and measure the amount of traffic going to a particular application.
Resource monitoring is essential.
Synthetic monitoring and root cause analysis have helped my team by allowing root cause monitoring to help us understand where the threat is coming from, enabling us to catch the threat before it impacts our users.
The reduction in outages is notable, with a 60 to 70% increase in outages reduction.
With the help of Catchpoint, we are able to address issues before our customers. Our triage time has reduced. We are able to reduce outages and unwanted user incidents.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Monitor | 2.9% |
| Catchpoint | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.
With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.
Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.
Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.
Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.
Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.
Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.