Catchpoint vs New Relic comparison

Catchpoint and New Relic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Catchpoint is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.4, while New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Catchpoint holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to New Relic’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of New Relic users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 24 Catchpoint reviews

5,049 Views
2,726 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

New Relic

Read 176 New Relic reviews

24,526 Views
16,432 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

New Relic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Catchpoint and New Relic are two competing application performance management tools. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive observability features and superior analytics capabilities.

Features: Catchpoint offers detailed network diagnostics, real user monitoring, and extensive performance monitoring. New Relic provides extensive integrations, real-time analytics, and multidimensional performance monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint needs to enhance its analytics dashboard, improve reporting functionalities, and upgrade data visualization tools. New Relic should simplify its complex alerting system, improve the learning curve, and streamline the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint offers a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service. New Relic’s deployment requires more extensive configuration but is balanced by high-quality assistance from their support team.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint's pricing is competitive with a good ROI, ideal for businesses needing specific network insights. New Relic is priced higher but delivers significant long-term ROI due to its comprehensive performance monitoring features.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. New Relic Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. New Relic

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.6

Catchpoint enhances efficiency and competitiveness by reducing outages, improving monitoring, saving time, cutting costs, and boosting trust.

Sentiment score

6.1

New Relic effectively enhances application performance by quickly resolving issues, saving time, and improving customer satisfaction.

There has been a significant reduction in major incidents observed due to the proactive alerting Catchpoint provides.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We used to spend at least 30 to 40 minutes on average on a call to detect what the problem was, but that reduced drastically to around 16 to 18 minutes.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have seen considerable returns on investment with Catchpoint, saving both money and employee time while reducing penalties from clients due to fewer outages during network deployments.

AshutoshSingh

Associate Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

There is return on investment because since we reduced the downtime, we can definitely save a lot of money within that period.

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

There is a definite return on investment for New Relic, as we would not have invested in building its infrastructure if there were no returns.

ArjunSharma

senior software at Norton Lifelock

After implementing New Relic, we have decreased staffing requirements while saving time and money.

reviewer2805771

Senior Observability Engineer I at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.9

Catchpoint's 24/7 support is praised for quick response, accessibility, and professional services, but network response times need improvement.

Sentiment score

7.3

New Relic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness and support, though some users desire quicker, clearer responses.

The initial migration and the initial days of monitoring Catchpoint involved having a dedicated TAM and a dedicated support number that could give us quick answers.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

They would literally write Playwright for you if you cannot get the element right.

Gitanjali Bhainsora

Senior Software Engineer at Turing

The customer support for Catchpoint is really good; they get you on the call and will assist you if you are mixed up or blocked with some kind of coding.

reviewer2867130

Lead Embedded SRe at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

If I drop an email to them, they will respond quickly to my email.

Vamsi Busa

Senior DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Customer support from New Relic is very good, and we rarely need to create support tickets.

ArjunSharma

senior software at Norton Lifelock

They are very polite and helped him out.

TusharGoel

Cloud Engineer at TO THE NEW Digital

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Catchpoint scales effectively for SaaS, requires manual configuration for on-premise, and lacks cluster support in single-node deployments.

Sentiment score

7.6

New Relic is highly scalable, supporting varied workloads and environments, aided by seamless AWS integration and a flexible SaaS model.

The migration part, especially onboarding a new application for monitoring, is seamless and does not require a lot of our effort and analysis.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Updating the license for the number of users is easy to do in Catchpoint.

reviewer2866356

Product Specialist at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have not faced any issues regarding scalability.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

We currently use New Relic for tens of thousands of developers and hundreds of teams within our organization, and we have not encountered any scalability issues.

ArjunSharma

senior software at Norton Lifelock

It is also suitable for cloud native architectures, SaaS, or software as a service, and for high volume data ingestion also.

TusharGoel

Cloud Engineer at TO THE NEW Digital

Regarding New Relic's scalability, it excels at the enterprise level for cloud integrations that can utilize tags.

reviewer2805771

Senior Observability Engineer I at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.8

Catchpoint is praised for stability and reliability, consistently achieving high ratings with no downtime or major issues reported.

Sentiment score

7.9

New Relic is stable, reliable, and efficient, with swift issue resolution, though minor performance hiccups occur occasionally.

Catchpoint is stable.

reviewer2870424

IT Sm & Customer Support Lead at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

New Relic lags sometimes.

TusharGoel

Cloud Engineer at TO THE NEW Digital

New Relic is stable based on my experience, as I have not seen any problems with the UI.

Oleksii Barybin

Contingent Worker at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Room For Improvement

Catchpoint needs improvements in setup, user experience, navigation, API integration, pricing models, and international monitoring for better efficiency.

Users request plugin enhancements, better data retention, third-party integration, improved interface, and optimized alerting, dashboards, and pricing.

This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

There is no auto-tuning for alerts, so auto-tuning features for alerts would be beneficial.

Gaurav-Bansal

Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful.

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Using real-time data, if there are any malicious patterns or something happening, they can identify those.

Hari Rajendiran

Platform Software Engineer 4 at Nexthink

Because of the pricing model, organizations have experienced uncontrolled costs and were not able to afford New Relic.

Aditya Krishnakumar

Senior SRE Engineer at SentinelOne

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Setup Cost

Catchpoint pricing varies and is consumption-based, favoring large enterprises but can be costly for smaller organizations.

New Relic's pricing is often seen as high but justified by its comprehensive features, despite confusing models.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is good, and the licensing is also good.

reviewer2866356

Product Specialist at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

There is always a need to negotiate a bit more to get the best cost for the licenses we plan to buy.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

you just need to buy the licenses, and the team sends you the license keys, which is pretty easy.

Gaurav-Bansal

Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Considering the features New Relic offers, the pricing or cost setup has not been a blocker for our budget.

ArjunSharma

senior software at Norton Lifelock

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for synthetic monitoring is that minions used to cost a lot.

Palak Bhawsar

DevOps engineer at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

As we talk about pricing, it is not that much cheaper.

HemantKumar7

Senior Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Valuable Features

Catchpoint offers synthetic monitoring, user-friendly dashboards, early issue detection, and global visibility, enhancing performance and reducing downtime.

New Relic offers real-time monitoring, easy dashboards, and alerting, enhancing performance insights with integration and predictive analytics.

Catchpoint helps us detect issues before anybody could report them, which can impact clients because it provides prior monitoring that also sees outside the infrastructure.

Gaurav-Bansal

Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Out of those features, the hop-by-hop breakdown of BGP peers is the one that made the biggest difference in my work because I have not seen this feature in others.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

The alerting functionality in Catchpoint provides value. We configure thresholds for response times and failures so that our operations team could be notified whenever authentication failed, APIs became unavailable, or page performance degraded beyond acceptable limits.

Gitanjali Bhainsora

Senior Software Engineer at Turing

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.

Pietro Dell'Erba

Head of API at a marketing services firm with 11-50 employees

New Relic is very useful for teams that don't have much of a dedicated DevOps team but want to have observability for their platform, and it's an easy way to get started.

Aditya Krishnakumar

Senior SRE Engineer at SentinelOne

New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time.

ArjunSharma

senior software at Norton Lifelock

For more quotes and insights, download the New Relic report

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

14th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (4th)

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

176

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (2nd), AIOps (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of New Relic is 3.8%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	3.8%
Catchpoint	0.9%
Other	95.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Proactive synthetic monitoring has reduced major incidents and provides global user experience insights

One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications. If an application depends upon MFA for its login flow, Catchpoint doesn't have the ability to bypass or monitor that flow for multi-factor authentication. This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA. This is one of the major areas needing improvement. Otherwise, Catchpoint has been one of the greatest tools in the synthetic monitoring or digital experience monitoring space, and I don't see anything else right now, but MFA is something that certainly needs some improvement.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	52
Large Enterprise	79

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am not directly involved in pricing, but the pricing is very decent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Catchpoint can be improved by supporting some of the APIs and other technical testing with some kind of metric validations as well. I do not have anything more to add about the needed improvements,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use case for Catchpoint is mostly automating. I use Catchpoint automatically for automated monitoring of our various UIs and also the backend APIs. We rely on Chrome and Selenium and JavaSc...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I find New Relic to be somewhat expensive. Our team shares logins, contrasting with other applications where individual team accounts are standard. Pricing is a primary concern since New Relic can ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for New Relic Insights?

As an Application Monitoring Engineer, my primary responsibilities include ensuring the uptime of services, managing infrastructure, and monitoring transactions. I use New Relic to set up incidents...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Grafana vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

August 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

July 2026

Download New Relic product report

Also Known As

No data available

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. New Relic

August 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. New Relic

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. New Relic and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. New Relic report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.