You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Azure Site Recovery vs Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and Veeam Software are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veeam Software users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

3,723 Views
1,489 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Read 23 Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Veeam Software, Broadcom and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (3rd)

Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2142519

IT Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Long-term user praises cost savings and reliability of disaster recovery solutions

There is only one thing to note: the agent has to be up-to-date when SCCM or any third-party tools are doing patching activities. If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery. Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer. When you raise a call, they wait too long, and even if you request an engineer to set up a call for severity B cases, they are not ready to communicate over the phone, preferring email instead.

Read full review

Denis Beaumont

General Manager at a computer retailer with 1-10 employees

User-friendly interface, and reasonably priced but the support needs improvement

While the solution is generally satisfactory, we encountered difficulties when attempting to seek assistance for issues we faced. Getting the necessary help proved to be quite challenging. The after-sales service is not ideal for French-speaking customers like us in Quebec. Unfortunately, there is no local support available for us. We are now able to work on more security-related tasks with Acronis, as they offer features such as antivirus, DLP, and various cybersecurity options. This is a significant improvement compared to our previous solution with Veeam Cloud Connect, where we were lacking such features. It also allows us to offer a wider range of security options to our customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can create automation to move workloads and redirect traffic to another region."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."

"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."

"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."

"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."

"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot capability."

"It's a great product because it's great scalability and it scales out from small to big companies perfectly."

"The most valuable features of Veeam Cloud Connect are its ease of use and the portal is very useful."

"The deployment is quite simple. Users are generally happy because of the familiarity they have with the features. The solution offers good transparency for the end-user."

"I like this solution and recommend it to clients."

"I've found flexibility to be the most valuable feature, and I also like that it's scalable and that the stability is okay."

"The most valuable feature of Veeam Cloud Connect is the server backups, such as the Microsoft Windows server. Additionally, the updates provide useful enterprise functionality."

"The stability and restore options on the solution are very good."

More Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] pros

Cons

"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."

"Could have more integration with other platforms."

"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."

"The immutable backup could be better and should be improved."

"The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration with other services."

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."

"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"It would be helpful if the enterprise edition was more complete. It's not as complete as the enterprise plus edition is."

"The flexibility results in more administrative GUI. The GUI needs improvement."

"We are now able to work on more security-related tasks with Acronis, as they offer features such as antivirus, DLP, and various cybersecurity options. This is a significant improvement compared to our previous solution with Veeam Cloud Connect, where we were lacking such features. It also allows us to offer a wider range of security options to our customers."

"The pricing is much higher than what our clients expect it to be."

"I think Veeam Cloud Connect could be more stable, scalable, and secure. I think better pricing is needed."

"The solution could improve the stability."

"The dashboard could be more intuitive."

"I also think the cost factor is a major issue for Veeam because it's a very expensive soluton especially when the client wants support for VMware."

More Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"They have a license to pay."

"The pricing of Veeam Cloud Connect is good."

"The licensing fee is on a monthly basis."

"I think that this is one of the most cost-effective solutions."

"The price of the solution could be cheaper. There are monthly or yearly subscription options available. The annual subscription tends to be cheaper."

"The price of the solution is reasonable because of our good standing with the vendor."

"We are looking into how we can extend the license of this product."

"It's not the cheapest solution on the market but it's reliable, so we find it cost-effective."

"The licensing is MSP-based. It is connected to the portal, and you can deploy it to your end users as well."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Site Recovery?

My main use case for Azure Site Recovery is that we are doing cross-region disaster recovery and processing.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Arcserve Cloud Direct vs Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Lumen SafeHaven vs Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

September 2026

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL]

August 2026

Download Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Veeam Cloud Connect for the Enterprise

Overview

Azure Site Recovery ensures seamless disaster recovery with features like scalability, automated file synchronization, real-time dashboards, and secure processes. It achieves a 99.99% uptime SLA and is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly interface.

Azure Site Recovery is a comprehensive disaster recovery service featuring load-balancing, fast snapshots, and native Azure integration for reliable performance. It manages virtual machine synchronization with seamless failover and data consistency, aiding in reducing secondary site expenses. With its robust architecture, the service supports organizations in maintaining business continuity, meeting regulatory compliance, and minimizing downtime through regular failover drills. Its implementation often capitalizes on Azure's reliability, ensuring infrastructure uptime and reduced hardware requirements.

What are the essential features of Azure Site Recovery?

Scalability: Adjusts to varying data loads for optimized performance.
User-Friendly Console: Simplifies configuration and management processes.
Automated File Synchronization: Ensures data consistency across locations.
Real-Time Dashboards: Offers immediate insights into system health and recovery status.
Secure Processes: Protects data with advanced security protocols.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Azure Site Recovery?

Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces need for extensive hardware investments.
Reduced Downtime: Ensures quick recovery, maintaining business operations.
High SLA Guarantees: Provides reliability with 99.99% uptime.
Resource Efficiency: Saves time and effort in disaster recovery management.

Organizations in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Site Recovery for its robust disaster recovery capabilities. The service navigates regulatory challenges with ease, aiding businesses in data duplication, VMware replication, and infrastructure backup. Its efficiency is leveraged to maintain critical systems during outages, facilitating business continuity and operational stability.

Microsoft

Veeam Cloud Connect for the Enterprise enables businesses to act as a disaster recover (DR) service provider to deliver off-site backup and replication services to internal customers. This eliminates complexity by removing the need to maintain a VPN connection and it improves security by encapsulating all backup and management traffic into a single port.

Veeam Software

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Worldwide Holdings, ContinuitySA, MPY, Linxdatacenter

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Veeam Software, Broadcom and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.