Bacula Enterprise vs Carbonite Server comparison

Bacula Systems and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bacula Systems is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #44. Bacula Systems holds a 1.4% mindshare in CB, compared to OpenText’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

4,198 Views
2,393 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,168 Views
1,869 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

Carbonite Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and Carbonite Server compete in the server backup solutions category. Carbonite Server is often seen as superior due to its advanced features and simplicity, despite its higher cost.

Features: Bacula Enterprise offers customizable configuration, compatibility with various operating systems, and lower setup costs due to its open-source roots. Carbonite Server provides automatic and continuous backup capabilities, a robust feature set, and simplicity in use.

Room for Improvement: Bacula Enterprise users suggest enhancements in reporting functions, better integration with cloud services, and a simplified deployment process. Carbonite Server users highlight the need for faster data restore, more flexible licensing options, and improved cost-effectiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise deployment is flexible but can be complex, requiring additional customer support, which is responsive. Carbonite Server offers a simpler deployment process and receives positive feedback for its customer support, making it easier for users to get started.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise is noted for its lower setup costs and favorable ROI due to its open-source roots and customizable features. Carbonite Server, although more expensive, is valued for its comprehensive service and perceived long-term investment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Carbonite Server Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Carbonite Server

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Ranking in Cloud Backup

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

56th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

44th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.4%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bacula Enterprise	1.4%
Carbonite Server	1.4%
Other	97.2%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"The most valuable feature is its ease of use; it works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"Technical support is excellent in my opinion."

More Bacula Enterprise pros

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The solution is very stable."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

More Carbonite Server pros

Cons

"The interface needs to be easier for adding new devices to be managed."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"Relying solely on a desktop is a bit frustrating as its GUI isn't exactly responsive."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

More Bacula Enterprise cons

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

More Carbonite Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."

"We have a perpetual license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

May 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Carbonite Recover Backup

Overview

Bacula Enterprise offers robust backup solutions with extensive plugins for services like SAP HANA and Microsoft SQL, supporting multi-platform environments. It's valued for scalability, transparent licensing, and effective data recovery.

Bacula Enterprise serves organizations with diverse IT landscapes by providing scalable backup solutions tailored for platforms like Linux servers. Its extensive documentation and community support ensure smooth operation and reliability. Users appreciate features including deduplication, compression, and centralized management, contributing to efficient data protection for industries such as banking and healthcare. The setup process can be complex for some, and there is demand for a more intuitive interface, improved mobile support, and better GUI functionality. Despite initial setup challenges, Bacula Enterprise remains a trusted tool for data management with flexible resource utilization and security features.

What are the key features of Bacula Enterprise?

Extensive Plugins: Supports SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL, enhancing integration.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across different IT environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing organizational needs efficiently.
Transparent Licensing: Offers cost-effective solutions with clear pricing.
Data Deduplication: Optimizes storage by eliminating redundant data.
Centralized Management: Streamlines data handling processes across systems.

What benefits should users seek in reviews of Bacula Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex backup procedures for technical teams.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes efficiency in data storage and retrieval.
Reliable Data Recovery: Ensures data can be restored effectively when needed.
Versatile Configuration: Supports easy customization for specific needs.

In sectors like banking, healthcare, and government, Bacula Enterprise handles large data volumes and secures backup tasks with encryption. Its multi-platform support is crucial for heterogeneous systems, executing scheduled tasks and data protection protocols efficiently, while fulfilling industry-specific compliance and reliability requirements.

Bacula Systems

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Carbonite Server

April 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Carbonite Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Carbonite Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Carbonite Server report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.