Bacula Enterprise vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Bacula Systems and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #24 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Bacula Systems holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

3,149 Views
1,732 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 345 HPE Zerto Software reviews

15,285 Views
8,712 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

HPE Zerto Software and Bacula Enterprise compete in the disaster recovery and data protection market. Bacula Enterprise seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set outweighing the benefits of HPE Zerto's pricing and support.

Features: HPE Zerto Software provides seamless disaster recovery, continuous data protection, and real-time replication, focusing on simplified management suitable for business continuity. Bacula Enterprise, known for its customizable framework, offers extensive support for diverse IT environments and robust feature sets, focusing on detailed control and cross-platform versatility.

Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could improve by expanding platform support and offering more customization options. Additionally, refining licensing flexibility could enhance adoption. Bacula Enterprise might enhance its user interface for easier navigation and streamline setup processes. Lowering initial setup costs could also make it more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise offers a flexible deployment model with detailed documentation and expert support, ensuring comprehensive customization. HPE Zerto Software is easier to install with robust service support, facilitating quick deployment and reducing technical hurdles. Bacula is adaptable to various ecosystems, while Zerto focuses on efficiency in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software is more competitively priced with clearer costs, appealing to businesses seeking quick savings. Bacula Enterprise might have higher setup costs but offers significant ROI through its extensive features and scalability. Zerto provides immediate value, while Bacula promises long-term investment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

2nd

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

345

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Zerto Software	2.0%
Bacula Enterprise	1.0%
Other	97.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

GiovanniRamirez

Senior IT Consultant at Xerif

Solid backup tool with good scalability

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy it in their environment It was a very good project. The Bacula concept, topology, and networking…

Read full review

David Riberdy

Enterprise data management supervisor at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

An all-in-one and cost-efficient solution that does what it promises

Zerto is very easy to use. Installation is about half an hour, and then it starts protecting the data and VMs. It is not very cumbersome. The UI is built very well. It is fairly self-explanatory. To be able to stand up a product you have never seen in half an hour and get it functioning and protecting speaks to how good the UI and workflow are. Zerto has near-synchronous replication. As a change is made on site A, it gets copied across the network to site B. We are five or six seconds behind production. If I have a heavily used system and I use traditional backups, I could be anywhere from 5 minutes to 23 hours behind. With Zerto, I am single-digit seconds behind. That works well for us. Our disaster recovery test, which used to span an entire week, now takes two days. We used to recover our servers in the first two or three days with a backup product and then test for two days before tearing it all down. Now, we spend half a day on new servers and ensuring things work with networking, etc. We test the next day, and we are done in two days. Across the entire company, we are able to save significant man-hours by shortening the test from a week to two days. We are now doing smaller tests once a month and larger tests once a year. Zerto has reduced our DR testing time by 60% to 70%. We are also able to do more disaster recovery testing. Previously, we were doing it once a year, whereas now, we are doing smaller tests once a month and our large tests once a year. In recovery point objectives, we are single-digit seconds behind. In terms of RTOs, I can recover 350 VMs in 30 minutes. It takes less than several seconds to restore a single VM. From days to 30 minutes for 350 compared to 100 VMs is an incredible time-saving in terms of RTOs and RPOs for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"We have seen ROI. The biggest way that we have seen it is in avoided downtime. We have had outages before, and we count downtime in terms of dollars spent. We have cut that down so dramatically, which provides us a very quick ROI. We have drastically reduced the amount of time it takes us to recover workloads, from an average of two hours to an average of 10 minutes."

"The most valuable feature is the point in time recovery. This allows us to recover at any point in time, up to a minute or so."

"There are a lot of valuable features. The basics of what it does to replicate and recover things within minutes is awesome. It's far above anything that any of the competition has. We offer other disaster recovery software but primarily use Zerto for recovery times and the number of recovery points because of how fast and easy it is. It's so much better."

"What I appreciate about Zerto is that it's set and forget."

"The feature of the HPE Zerto Software I appreciate the most is the ease of use of single file restores, which is something we use frequently."

"The dashboarding shows recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives, indicating seconds or minutes remaining, which is useful."

"We're able to replicate all of our data and be able to bring up an entire data center within a matter of minutes, which has become our go-to for our resiliency within both of our data centers."

"The customer support for HPE Zerto Software is very good."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"It is difficult to manage failing over between sites if you are at the site that was impacted."

"With the current updates primarily on the Azure side of it, documentation could be improved."

"They should not make it so expensive so that I can buy more of it."

"I had to have my colleague contact technical support because we had an issue where VMs in VMware were getting blocked, and we weren't able to delete them."

"I want to have an OVF or some local deployment where I can deploy the ZVRA rather than having to push it from the console. Some of our smaller remote sites have relatively poor bandwidth, and they can't keep up with the constant deployment stream from our center console, meaning we have to find some creative hours to get around the bandwidth bottlenecks. If I could push out a small install file, install it locally, and then reach back to the console, that would be excellent."

"I want Zerto to add support for Proxmox."

"Expanding the product to compete more fully with products such as Veeam would be a big benefit in the market."

"Certain areas were designed and work fine for VMware but are under development for Hyper-V. Eventually, all features will work for both platforms."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"It was pretty appropriate. It was not too cheap, not too expensive. It was just about right."

"It is not the cheapest option on the market, but it offers a number of features that make it a good value for businesses that need a comprehensive disaster recovery plan."

"It is not the cheapest product; it is not the most expensive product, but it works. It is a mid-range product, and it is justified in terms of being pretty quick and easy."

"The pricing is good. It's affordable."

"They should adjust the pricing because I feel its price is too much. If they reduce the price, there will be more users and customers."

"Zerto's pricing is competitive, given the benefits and ease of setting it up. It may seem more expensive upfront, but you're going to save that over the long term by spending less engineering time configuring, reconfiguring, etc."

"The pricing seems fair."

"We feel it is pretty cost-efficient. For the amount of protection that we get for Zerto, we feel that it is at an excellent price point, especially compared to some of the other vendors that were just backup solutions. For all that it does, we feel that the price is good."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	90
Midsize Enterprise	87
Large Enterprise	197

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

From a pricing perspective, HPE Zerto Software is expensive in comparison to other products on the market, but I think it is an easier sell because it works so well and it is so easy to set up a de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 27% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

January 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software

February 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. HPE Zerto Software report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.