


Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps and Barracuda SecureEdge are both active players in the cybersecurity sector. Barracuda SecureEdge is often chosen for its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is regarded as offering better value due to its pricing.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps provides comprehensive security tools, including app discovery, policy enforcement, and seamless integration with Microsoft environments, enhancing organizational security efforts. Barracuda SecureEdge offers robust network security, seamless cloud-native application integration, and features that fortify network protection, making it ideal for businesses with a strong focus on both network and cloud security.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is noted for its easy integration with other Microsoft products, simplifying deployment for existing Microsoft users. Its customer service is responsive and effective. Barracuda SecureEdge offers a flexible deployment model that accommodates various environments, an advantage for companies needing adaptable solutions. Its versatile service adaptability enhances customer experience.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is priced competitively, typically offering a manageable setup cost and demonstrating substantial ROI, particularly for organizations centered around Microsoft products. Barracuda SecureEdge might entail higher initial costs but is perceived as delivering significant value due to its extensive feature set, attracting businesses ready to invest in enhanced capabilities. The cost-effectiveness of Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps stands out.
With iboss, whenever you turn on your laptop, the iboss agent automatically connects to the iboss cloud, enforcing all security policies. So with respect to the security side, it strengthens measures.
Deploying iboss leads to good return on investment, estimated around 70% to 80%.
I have seen some cost effectiveness from iboss; it has reduced certain support requirements, making it a more hands-off solution.
Considering the security features and centralized management capability it provides, we feel it offers good value for the investment.
It has enhanced visibility into user activity and helped enforce consistent security policies across different locations.
I estimate that routing network administration and policy management activities require roughly 30 to 40% less effort than before, allowing our team to focus on higher priority projects rather than day-to-day maintenance.
The biggest return on investment so far has been visibility, knowing what we have in our environment.
As a small team, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps allowed us to manage systems with just one or two people.
We have at least saved the costs we had from the Netskope solution this year.
They are very fast, responsive, and knowledgeable.
The quality of the support is fantastic.
We had promising discussions about resolving these issues, but no real action followed.
The support team for Barracuda SecureEdge is responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful when troubleshooting issues.
The engineers have been able to provide useful guidance during troubleshooting and implementation activities.
The ticketing system is very efficient, and they provide support promptly.
Their customer service is pretty good, but it's frustrating to go through three or four channels before reaching the right person.
The support is excellent, and the speed of response is commendable.
There were instances where the engineers were knowledgeable and helpful, but at other times it felt like a ping pong game, with unnecessary transfers until the right person was found.
They are also able to meet on-demand requirements based on your contract with them, and can easily provide adequate resources and scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
If I start seeing sluggishness or anything like that, I just reach out to my rep, and they connect with their dev team, typically resolving it the same day.
The centralized management platform makes it easy to manage growth without significantly increasing administrative effort.
The centralized cloud management makes it easy to support additional users, locations and security requirements.
Barracuda SecureEdge has good scalability because it is a cloud-based solution.
For what I know about the log collector and how much data it can take in, it is super scalable and capable of handling high workloads.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is very scalable, provided you have the right subscription.
In my experience, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is good enough for small to medium businesses.
It's been pretty solid; I've never had an outage with them, and if I ever had, it's only been once out of the seven years.
We've experienced zero downtime.
Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device despite our ClearPass sending information to the iboss box.
The platform has provided consistent performance for both security management and remote connectivity.
It has improved consistent performance for security connectivity and remote access.
I would rate it a ten because I have not experienced any stability issues so far with Defender for Cloud Apps.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps as stable
My impression on the stability and reliability of Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is that it is very stable.
It is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform.
iboss's single pane of glass console gives centralized visibility into web traffic, user activity, security policies, and alerts from one dashboard.
We also had a problem with a transition when we upgraded from one appliance of theirs to another, but their engineer lost a good deal of our data.
If Barracuda's security team could provide some use cases on how to secure the remote access of contractors and remote users who are facilitating utilities like energy sectors and water treatment plants, it would give a very good edge to Barracuda's security team.
Compared to leading SASE vendors, Barracuda SecureEdge is still evolving and lacks some advanced features and integration depth that may require evaluating for large and global enterprises.
One area where I believe the product could be enhanced is in reporting and analytics, with more customizable dashboards and deeper insight for security and performance monitoring.
For data loss prevention, it would be useful to be able to drill down into the kind of data being transferred over CloudApp.
Defender typically connects to Entra ID, but we have local users on the cloud for database access, SSH, or RDS, and there is nothing produced by Defender regarding those local IAM users.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps would benefit if Microsoft allows users to fine-tune false positives, enabling us to dismiss alerts or make adjustments so that such things don't trigger multiple times in the future.
It offers the same features you would get from a vendor that charges 250,000 British pounds for a fraction of the price.
The following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern.
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Barracuda SecureEdge has been good, as our director dealt with it, and we received a good package with our current system because we were also using Barracuda cloud backup.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is acceptable.
The pricing for Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is acceptable.
My organization is currently revisiting pricing, but previously, the cost was a bit expensive, yet comparable to other solutions with similar functionalities and features.
It's not the cheapest, but also not the most expensive, placing it in the mid-level range.
The solution's mental health function can detect if someone needs help.
It's given us a lot more visibility into our computer assets that may be infected with viruses and also shows us people who have unusually large uploads or might be engaging in high-risk activities, such as searches or going to sites not categorized by their web crawler.
iboss was the best solution for us because, no matter what domain you were in, everything is under a single pane of glass, which is exactly what we wanted.
The best features that Barracuda SecureEdge offers, in my experience, start with a Secure Web Gateway for internet traffic protection, Zero Trust Network Access, SD-WAN integration, Firewall as a Service, centralized policy and management, remote user security, work-from-home capabilities, branch connectivities plus cloud security, and application-level access control.
It simplified policy management, reduced the time spent on administration and gave us better visibility across all locations.
The best features Barracuda SecureEdge offers are its centralized cloud-based management, secure remote access capabilities, and ease of deployment.
It provides excellent suggestions and options for configuration; for example, it can track suspicious files getting uploaded to cloud resources on Azure based on their signatures, generating alerts for those files.
The product recommends things that need to be blocked and allows for dynamic configuration, which cuts down on potential issues that might arise from going through lists and understanding what needs to be blocked.
The ability to sanction unsanctioned apps using Secure Score benchmarking, included in Cloud, is also beneficial.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps | 5.8% |
| iboss | 4.5% |
| Barracuda SecureEdge | 1.7% |
| Other | 88.0% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.
Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.
What are the most important features of Iboss?The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.
Barracuda SecureEdge is a comprehensive security platform designed to provide robust protection, streamline operations, and ensure compliance. It caters to businesses looking for secure and efficient network solutions.
Barracuda SecureEdge offers a range of tools to enhance security across your infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly with existing networks, managing risks through advanced threat intelligence. Known for its user-friendly experience, it aids businesses in maintaining security standards while optimizing network performance.
What are the essential features of Barracuda SecureEdge?In industries like finance and healthcare, Barracuda SecureEdge can be instrumental in meeting compliance standards while ensuring data integrity. Its deployment strategy aligns well with the requirements of sectors needing high security and regulatory adherence. Efficient threat detection and mitigation capabilities are crucial for these sensitive fields.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is a robust tool for shadow IT detection, cloud integration, and threat detection, enhancing security management with capabilities in auditing and data protection.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps strengthens cloud security by providing comprehensive insights into user activities, seamlessly integrating with Microsoft security products and platforms like SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. Its investigative capabilities enhance threat detection, while real-time alerts and policy applications improve security posture. Organizations benefit from its monitoring, auditing, and privileged identity management features that contribute to enhanced security management and data protection.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps?Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps implementation varies across industries, crucial for sectors needing stringent data protection and compliance, like finance and healthcare. Firms use it to monitor user activity, enforce data loss prevention policies, and ensure security across multi-cloud environments while integrating with Azure services for comprehensive threat management. These implementations are particularly beneficial in improving compliance efforts and protecting sensitive data.
We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.