No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Veza comparison

Why PeerSpot?
BeyondTrust and Veza are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. BeyondTrust is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Veza is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.7. BeyondTrust holds a 2.3% mindshare in PAM, compared to Veza’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of BeyondTrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veza users who would recommend it.
BeyondTrust Privileged Remo...
Read 23 BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access reviews
  • 5,045 Views
  • 2,876 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Veza
Read 4 Veza reviews
  • 5,824 Views
  • 1,107 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Veza based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Veza Report (Updated: September 2026).
Buyer's Guide
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Veza
September 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BeyondTrust Privileged Remo...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (12th), Secure Remote Access (1st)
Veza
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
23rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
GRC (23rd), Identity Management (IM) (18th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (9th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (7th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access is 2.3%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access2.3%
Veza1.5%
Other96.2%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Hahn Rolf - PeerSpot reviewer
Hahn Rolf
CEO at MICRODYN AG
Securely manage high-privilege remote access with granular configurations
I recommend that we improve integration with other products like PasswordSafe, aiming for smoother integration. Better alignment between products would enhance manageability from a single point. Additionally, BeyondTrust should focus on automating the update process to reduce unnecessary ticket creation. Improved quality control for non-English language versions is needed to avoid translation and layout errors.
Read full review
Guddeti Srikanth - PeerSpot reviewer
Guddeti Srikanth
Senior Consultant at Capgemini
Identity visibility has improved and access governance supports least-privilege decisions
I wouldn't say major drawbacks, but there are a few minor challenges and limitations to consider. Veza provides significant value for identity security and access governance, but one of the main challenges is the initial implementation and integration process, particularly in organizations with complex environments, multiple cloud platforms, and a larger number of applications.Connecting different systems and ensuring that identity and permissions data is collected accurately required careful planning, technical coordination, and collaboration between security, IT, and application teams. Regarding its governance and security, my experience has not been very comprehensive, but the security approach is valuable because the AI-driven security insights need to operate with a clearer framework of access control, accountability, and data protection.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its security, simplicity, and ease of deployment and maintenance are the most valuable. It is FIPS compliant, so it goes through severe penetration testing every one year or two years. They have to maintain this compliance. It is very safe. Customers have been using it in the last eight years because of the simplicity of getting it deployed quickly. Most of the people using the solution had been hacked already, so they needed it quickly. As compared to the other solutions in the market, it can be turned on in production very quickly. You don't really need to have a server. It can be deployed very rapidly on VMware or Hyper-V, and you don't need to do an installation. It is a kind of an all-included package that you just deploy in a VM environment. It is basically a VM that is specifically built for a customer. The way the PRA data solutions work is that you need to build them for each customer because of being hard-coded with their SSL certificate, their web page name, and all that."
"Based on the feedback from my colleagues who have never complained about the technical support, I would say that the product's support team is good."
"The privileged remote access platform is able to track and record everything that happens within a session."
"The security provided by PRA when it comes to access for remote and privileged users has been outstanding. It has met all of our objectives, everything from password rotation to securing and allowing us to clamp down access to the auditing and monitoring features."
"The secure access must be audited live, ensuring patient data protection."
"I'd rate the solution ten out of ten."
"We can truly elevate our admin rights while we're in there to fully take control of a system and manage it as if it was sitting right here on our desk. Most of the organization has gone to remote work or work from home. With that being the case, this solution allows us to be able to still work with our end-users, even though they're not always sitting on our network."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution can be implemented regardless of the operating system."
More BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access pros
"It's the only current GRC vendor with licensing rights for HITRUST 11.3 framework, and I've avoided expensive HITRUST licensing costs through a custom control framework."
"One of its strongest features is the ability to provide a clearer picture of who has access to critical applications, cloud platforms, infrastructure, and sensitive data."
"In one dashboard or one place, I can see all the company's identity."
"Veza has positively impacted my organization by improving access for our users, allowing us to check the user and perform auditing for our system or organization, and we are now able to implement least privilege practices, which has made our organization and system more secure."
 

Cons

"The integration of the solution with many platforms is a difficult area to manage and needs to be made easy."
"The issue I found with the product revolves around the fact that RDP and SSH sessions take too much time, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is very flexible, which is a plus, but I would say the implementation requires someone with knowledge and experience, as it can be easy to get lost in all the details. The implementation process could be streamlined and simplified. Though the complexity of the solution provides greater flexibility, it requires a lot of time to understand it fully."
"Some of the capabilities in the solution were not as available or not as outstanding as CyberArk. We had to manage whatever little was available for us, especially its recording capabilities, logs, and a number of things."
"They could probably integrate a wizard or something like that to add a new use case. It could be something that makes it easier to add a new use case."
"It has been clunky but that has gotten a lot better."
"There is no connectivity to the appliance side. There is no API, and it is just difficult for me to capture what version the device is on without going in and doing screenshots. It is a little too secure in that regard, where they don't even trust their product owner. Since a lot of hacks come from the inside, they are probably doing what they need to do out of necessity. It is just that I have to work pretty hard to produce compliance data on the box."
"Changing your password should be simplified, and there should not be a charge for it."
More BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access cons
"The support experience could be better."
"I wouldn't say major drawbacks, but there are a few minor challenges and limitations to consider."
"Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems."
"In Veza, there is some scope for improvement, as I can see that custom integration is not easy."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is pretty good for the features and services that it provides. It is not outrageous. I'm not aware of any additional charges or anything like that."
"PRA's pricing is competitive."
"My client found the solution a bit expensive but considering their use case and requirements, they didn't have any other choice. As far as I know, implementation and licensing are the only costs."
"Though the solution was a bit expensive, the overall pricing was average."
"I rate the product's pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is high, and ten is low. It is an expensive product."
"The price is pretty expensive, but you get what you pay for and this is a great product."
"PRA was one of the cheapest solutions that we evaluated."
"I wish it was a little bit cheaper, but when a product is as solid as this, I understand what the cost does. It helps them to make sure it stays that way. If you want a reliable, solid product, you're going to pay more."
More BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?
Improving technical support for BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access is essential. When I communicate with technical support for BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, the response time is very slow.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?
When we are using BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access with FortiGate or some Cisco third-party products, we collaborate with both vendors, take the requirement, and follow up with the technical te...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?
I have not utilized the endpoint least privilege management feature in BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access as I have only been using it for eight or nine months. I am not working with other produc...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is much higher and the setup is very complex.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Veza?
Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems. Additionally, there are no e...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Veza?
My main use case for Veza is to use it for authentication and to determine who can access what and what can be accessed by the system or organization users. We set permissions for cloud platforms a...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Safeguard by One Identity vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Logo
Safeguard by One Identity vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Compared 8% of the time
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Logo
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Compared 8% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Compared 7% of the time
BeyondTrust Remote Support vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Logo
BeyondTrust Remote Support vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Compared 7% of the time
Cyolo vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Logo
Cyolo vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Compared 7% of the time
More BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access Competitors
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Veza Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Veza
Compared 13% of the time
Lumos vs Veza Logo
Lumos vs Veza
Compared 8% of the time
Idira IGA vs Veza Logo
Idira IGA vs Veza
Compared 5% of the time
Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Veza Logo
Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Veza
Compared 5% of the time
Formalize vs Veza Logo
Formalize vs Veza
Compared 5% of the time
More Veza Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
October 2026
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access reportDownload BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access product report
Buyer's Guide
Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM)
October 2026
Veza reportDownload Veza product report
 

Also Known As

Bomgar Privileged Access
No data available
 

Overview

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access enhances network security with flexibility and FIPS-compliant encryption. It enables rapid deployment without a VPN, simplifying credential handling and compliance while reducing complexity in remote work environments.

Designed to secure internal and vendor access to servers, applications, and energy grids, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access supports compliance requirements such as NERC, NIST, and FedRAMP. It manages RDP sessions, credential rotations, and high-privilege access, serving as a VPN alternative. Active Directory integration and robust vault features simplify credential management. With session and access monitoring, it offers enhanced security and control, facilitating a smooth transition to cloud-based deployments while improving network operations.

What are the key features of BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?

  • Strong Security: FIPS compliance and encryption ensure data protection.
  • Rapid Deployment: Set up quickly without relying on a VPN.
  • User Management: Seamless control through integration with Active Directory.
  • Advanced Access Controls: Enhance monitored access to sensitive systems.
  • Vault Features: Simplify credential handling and rotation.

What benefits can users expect from BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?

  • Flexibility: Adaptable to different IT environments.
  • Enhanced Security: Protects remote access and sensitive data.
  • Compliance Support: Meets standards like NERC, NIST, and FedRAMP.
  • Simplified Deployment: Reduces setup time and complexity.
  • Monitored Access: Provides comprehensive session tracking and reporting.

Enterprises in industries like energy, finance, and technology deploy BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access to control and monitor secure access, aligning with strict regulatory requirements. Its capability to integrate seamlessly with existing systems and support cloud-based transitions makes it a strategic tool for enhancing operational efficiency and security.

BeyondTrust

Veza Core Authorization Platform enhances data access visibility, centralizes control, and simplifies user permissions management. Its robust security through zero-trust principles, seamless integration, and automated compliance reporting boost organizational efficiency, productivity, and security, while streamlining workflows and minimizing vulnerabilities.

Veza
 

Sample Customers

Horizon Beverage, Air Liquide, Gateway Bank of Florida
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Veza
September 2026
Free Report: BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Veza
Find out what your peers are saying about BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Veza and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. Veza report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.