BigPanda vs FortiMonitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BigPanda and Fortinet are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. BigPanda is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.3, while Fortinet is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0. BigPanda holds a 0.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Fortinet’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BigPanda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

BigPanda

Read 20 BigPanda reviews

5,424 Views
2,929 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

5,646 Views
2,823 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BigPanda

FortiMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

BigPanda and FortiMonitor compete in IT operations management. FortiMonitor often holds an advantage due to its extensive features, making it worth the investment over BigPanda, which is favored for pricing and support.

Features: BigPanda provides strong incident management capabilities, emphasizing root cause analysis to streamline IT workflows. It boosts operational efficiency by offering optimized incident response solutions. FortiMonitor, however, provides robust monitoring and analytics features that offer deep insights into network performance, focusing on broad system monitoring and comprehensive data analysis.

Room for Improvement: BigPanda could enhance its deployment process, simplify integration, and broaden its monitoring capabilities. FortiMonitor might improve on pricing flexibility, reduce initial setup costs, and streamline some user interface elements to enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiMonitor offers straightforward integration and a smooth setup process, with a responsive customer service team. BigPanda presents a more complex deployment that is eased by robust technical support, helping users manage initial challenges effectively.

Pricing and ROI: BigPanda offers a cost-effective entry point with solid ROI due to efficiency in incident resolution. FortiMonitor, despite higher setup costs, yields significant ROI through its extensive monitoring capabilities, making the additional expenditure worthwhile.

To learn more, read our detailed BigPanda vs. FortiMonitor Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BigPanda vs. FortiMonitor

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BigPanda

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (11th)

FortiMonitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

43rd

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of BigPanda is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BigPanda	0.6%
FortiMonitor	0.8%
Other	98.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Automated incident workflows have reduced alert noise and now improve response efficiency

In my opinion, the best feature of BigPanda is its speed in terms of deployment. It has very strong integration with all of the major platforms and workflows that organizations need. The biggest customers are enterprises like HSBC and Barclays. Implementing something effective for them that dramatically reduces meantime to repair and the number of incidents is substantially difficult, as projects can often extend three years with very small results. BigPanda is different; it is a tool relied on by many enterprises, fitting over existing toolsets rather than trying to replace them, which makes it non-competitive to many existing alerts and monitoring tools. It enhances existing systems to provide actionable intelligence for business solutions.

Read full review

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard."

"BigPanda is great in that it notifies us of problems as well as where they were triggered."

"The program is very stable."

"The main thing that we like about BigPanda is the user interface."

"Overall, I rate BigPanda as a nine out of ten."

"Easy integration - We've had challenges in the past integrating all of our various monitoring sources and tools into one central system. BigPanda, with the integrations that it already has, as well as offering webhook/REST API, has made it very easy for us to plug everything in."

"BigPanda improves service reliability with instant resolution, increased uptime, and reduced mean time to resolution, thus enhancing service quality."

"I would definitely recommend BigPanda for its time-saving features, root cause analysis, topology overview, and visual event representation capabilities."

More BigPanda pros

"Fortinet's customer support is very good."

"FortiMonitor is 100% stable."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"Overall, I would recommend FortiMonitor to others."

"FortiMonitor's dashboard is very informative and user-friendly."

"The solution helps to see client infrastructure. It has many boxes and blinks green or red when the station goes up or down. We have different domains for the device groups that we monitor."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is user monitoring, as we are able to see if the user is following the policy or not from their system, and additionally the solution integrates well with Fortinet FortiGate and has centralized management."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

More FortiMonitor pros

Cons

"BigPanda can improve the correlations. We didn't see any big value."

"The usability needs to improve, because it is a pure code environment."

"The observability can be enriched with regards to infrastructure and the application-integrated environment. The dashboard and reports could be improved."

"BigPanda attempts a little of everything and fails at most; the AI, in particular, was worthless, and the visualization is primitive and not configurable."

"Lacks sufficient dashboard features."

"We'd like to see additional dashboard features included as part of the solution."

"The solutions were quite useful but not completely stable."

"We had to use a partner for the deployment."

More BigPanda cons

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"We use FortiToken, and it's a pain to use because you have to send things through your phone and then confirm by email. Only after this can you log in. It's dual-factor authentication. I wish that I could just log in or bring up a dashboard where I could log in from."

"For our type of country, it is always expensive, but it has competitive pricing."

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"FortiMonitor could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems, such as Linux."

"There is room for improvement in the FortiMonitor report. It is not ideal for showcasing to tech customers or managers, especially when trying to display high CPU usage from logins within a specific range of months or the most recent month."

More FortiMonitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They were great to work with on pricing/licensing. Given we are a high-growth company, we needed a flexible site license."

"BigPanda is cheaper than the competitors."

"We pay $200,000 USD per year."

"The price of BigPanda is in the middle compared to other solutions."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigPanda?

Regarding extra expenses, I pay more for communication and do not incur costs for another dashboard perspective, but there are indirect costs related to managing open-source products, leading to re...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BigPanda?

Something that comes to mind regarding improvements is communication, as I rely heavily on another tool. If BigPanda could provide communication capabilities beyond just sending notifications—such ...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiMonitor?

There are areas for improvement that FortiManager is addressing. We have not yet upgraded to the latest software versions, being a full revision behind, but we plan to update soon since the current...

See all answers

Comparisons

Moogsoft vs BigPanda

Compared 9% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs BigPanda

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs BigPanda

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs BigPanda

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs BigPanda

Compared 4% of the time

More BigPanda Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BigPanda

October 2026

Download BigPanda product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

October 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panopta

Overview

BigPanda enhances incident management through root cause analysis, alert deduplication, and event correlation. The AI-driven platform is designed for environments with high alert volumes, providing insights for data-driven decisions and seamless integration with tools like ServiceNow and Teams.

BigPanda addresses the complexities of incident management by offering an AI-focused approach to anomaly detection. Automation improves response times, while unified analytics supports informed decision-making. Despite AI integration and usability needing enhancement, the platform simplifies observability and ticketing through integrations with New Relic and Slack. Features like enrichment mapping and unified search improve functionality, though reporting and visualization aspects require development.

What are the key features of BigPanda?

Root Cause Analysis: Efficient identification of the sources of incidents.
Alert Deduplication: Reduces alert noise by consolidating duplicates.
Event Correlation: Connects related alerts for easier incident management.
Automation: Streamlines processes for faster response times.
Seamless Integration: Connects with tools like ServiceNow and Teams.

What benefits or ROI can users find in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Automates incident management tasks.
Operational Insights: Provides valuable analytics for strategic decisions.
Improved Collaboration: Integrates notifications with Slack and other platforms.
Reduced Alert Fatigue: Deduplication and suppression improve focus on critical issues.

BigPanda is widely implemented in industries focusing on observability and predictive analysis, providing efficient alert processing and incident management. Users utilize its capabilities to seamlessly integrate with solutions like Dynatrace, particularly in environments that handle high volumes of alerts, ensuring effective notification delivery through various platforms.

BigPanda

FortiMonitor excels in user monitoring and network operations, with its central management and intuitive dashboard. Known for reducing administrative costs and enhancing security awareness, it also provides seamless integration with other devices.

FortiMonitor supports dual-factor authentication, alert systems, and system health monitoring, proving essential for technical teams managing infrastructures and FortiGate activities. Despite its benefits, there are areas like compatibility and pricing where improvements are sought. It offers high-level monitoring, customizable dashboards, and alert capabilities which are critical in busy environments, especially for detecting harmful activities and ensuring efficient CPU utilization.

What features enhance FortiMonitor's efficiency?

User Monitoring: Monitors end users and logs effectively.
Traffic Analysis: Offers comprehensive insights into network traffic.
Dual-factor Authentication: Enhances security with two-step verification.
Centralized Management: Streamlines operations with an intuitive dashboard.
Proactive Alerts: Provides redundancy and instant notifications for potential issues.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with other devices for continuity.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Reduction: Lowers administrative costs significantly.
Security Awareness: Improves security management efficiency.
Data Continuity: Ensures continuous operations with automated vendor configuration.
Efficiency Gains: Adapts to new vendors and enhances CPU utilization.

FortiMonitor is widely implemented in industries for end-user monitoring, security tracking, and infrastructure management. It's crucial for environments needing high-level monitoring and identifying hardware problems, where proactive management and customizable dashboards are key to maintaining operations.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Nagios, ServiceNow, ITSM, NOC, CMDB Evolved, RemedyIncident Management Process

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Buyer's Guide

BigPanda vs. FortiMonitor

October 2026

Free Report: BigPanda vs. FortiMonitor

Find out what your peers are saying about BigPanda vs. FortiMonitor and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BigPanda vs. FortiMonitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.