Binary Defense MDR vs Field Effect MDR comparison

Binary Defense and Field Effect are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Binary Defense is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.7, while Field Effect is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.2. Binary Defense holds a 1.0% mindshare in MDR, compared to Field Effect’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Binary Defense users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Field Effect users who would recommend it.

Binary Defense MDR

Read 16 Binary Defense MDR reviews

3,357 Views
2,249 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Read 31 Field Effect MDR reviews

5,144 Views
5,093 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Binary Defense MDR

Field Effect MDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Binary Defense MDR and Field Effect MDR are major players in the cybersecurity market, each with their unique strengths in threat detection and response. Binary Defense appears to have the upper hand in patient customization and rapid response, while Field Effect is favored for its continuous vigilance and intuitive action recommendations.

Features:Binary Defense MDR boasts seamless integration, swift response times, and unparalleled customization capabilities, providing a strong support system with detailed documentation. Field Effect MDR emphasizes continuous monitoring, including cloud protection, and offers effective notifications coupled with automated responses and actionable recommendations.

Room for Improvement:Binary Defense MDR users seek enhanced language support, better API integration, and expanded SIEM capabilities, citing a need for improved staffing stability and proactive account management. Field Effect MDR users point to desired enhancements in patch management, interface improvements, and more comprehensive third-party integrations, noting deficiencies in DNS coverage and email security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Binary Defense MDR is renowned for excellent customer service and streamlined deployment across various cloud environments, supported by a highly responsive team. Field Effect MDR offers strong support and multi-environment compatibility, though some users note complexities in integrations that could be simplified for smaller clients.

Pricing and ROI:Binary Defense MDR provides competitive pricing viewed as cost-effective compared to in-house security costs, delivering significant ROI through enhanced security posture and reduced resource needs. Field Effect MDR has reasonable pricing, particularly appealing with its user-based model, though justifying the spend can be challenging within tight budget constraints. Both platforms offer value in security monitoring and management, reducing the risk of costly breaches.

To learn more, read our detailed Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Binary Defense MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

14th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Binary Defense MDR is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 2.1%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Field Effect MDR	2.1%
Binary Defense MDR	1.0%
Other	96.9%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2588769

Cybersecurity Architect, Information Technology Division at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Phenomenal response time and good handling of context in our diverse environment

We are going to have a meeting with them the following Monday. It will be our first quarterly business review. Half of it is going to be looking at new products and new functions that they are bringing out. So far, I do not have anything negative or a concern. There were two small mistakes that the technician made, and they were remedied immediately. Once we brought them to their attention, they were remedied. I do not have any complaints. They were just simple mistakes that anybody could make, and their response was a positive response. So far, I have not had anything negative to say. The only area for improvement that I can think of relates to statistical analysis for SLAs. They are in the middle of moving to a new product called D3 which is going to do some backend work for them. I know they are working to improve some of the help desk statistics, such as the time the tickets open and the time they are closed. They are working on that function. It is going to be resolved in the next month or two. We have service level agreements with them, but they can use improved statistics for service level agreements. This is the only point of improvement I can identify.

Read full review

reviewer2753850

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Customer security is enhanced with software and update detection while licensing process needs improvement

A quick specific example of how I use Field Effect MDR to keep my customers secure is that it helps me identify computers that need updates, even when I believe they are already updated. Field Effect MDR finds software and Windows updates that aren't being completed, which I find very valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Binary Defense has a human service department that provides live monitoring for our systems."

"With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating."

"Binary Defense's most valuable feature is the 24/7 monitoring and threat hunting. Their team checks the latest breaches and how they're done."

"The speed at which their services are reactive is valuable. Nowadays, when a threat hits an endpoint, you've got minutes, not hours or days. Their average response time is about four minutes on an alert. For anything that needs to be sent to us, it's about fourteen minutes, which is pretty good. They're the third SOC that I've used in fifteen years. By far, they are the quickest ones to act. When you're looking at prevention, that's a key factor."

"The best part about Binary Defense MDR is that it runs on everything, and they keep an eye on things 24/7."

"Binary Defense is comprehensive. We see most of the questionable activity. Once you see things a couple of times and are familiar with the processes, you know what those are. The level of activity is definitely favorable."

"Our mean time to response has gone down. We're much faster with direct response and have more investigative capabilities than we did before."

"The most valuable part of Binary Defense is its team of cybersecurity analysts. Their analysts filter out the noise and only forward the critical threats that require a response instead of false positives."

More Binary Defense MDR pros

"The most valuable features are Action Recommendations of Observations, which keep us informed about existing vulnerabilities so we can proactively update our endpoints and those of our customers against potential threats."

"Direct and easy and quick communication to the Field Effect cybersecurity team experts has led to quick resolution of any problems or alerts."

"The most valuable features are AROs, which provide timely notifications for out-of-compliance or out-of-specification detections."

"The most valuable aspect of Field Effect Covalence is its ability to continuously monitor for and identify potential threats."

"It is easy to manage surveillance."

"The most valuable feature is the network traffic monitoring function."

"I appreciate the "set it and forget it" nature of Field Effect Covalence."

"Covalence's cloud protection element has been excellent. A lot of organizations are using 365. It's hard to find a secure solution for protecting accounts. We've gone down the path of trying to utilize other security solutions for that particular area. We've been disappointed and always come back to trying to implement Covalence when we can so we know people are safe."

More Field Effect MDR pros

Cons

"We found that an earlier version of the agent had high memory usage and that was a bit concerning, but we raised the concern with their support team and they immediately replied that they had noticed the same thing and had a candidate fix already available... it totally fixed the issue."

"The current reporting system could benefit from improvement."

"Binary Defense MDR could be even better with additional features, like automatic scans and file quarantine."

"The only area I see for improvement with Binary Defense is their service portal. It could benefit from some enhancements."

"It's hard to think of anything that they need to improve on, but just to point out something, I would like to see them provide advanced XDR."

"We found a couple of bugs in the user interface."

"I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking."

"If I were shopping for an MDR solution today, I would not only look for a company that has the ability to alert, detect, and remediate, but also the ability to integrate vulnerability management. That's a big thing that they're lacking today."

More Binary Defense MDR cons

"In terms of improvement, there are instances where the ARO responses are slightly slower than preferred."

"The area where they can make it better is by giving responses to the end-user. For example, when there is an alert to the administrator, I get it. I have to copy and paste everything to everyone... And then I have to follow up with them, and it's a real pain."

"It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying."

"The ConnectWise PSA integration is two-way but does not send our comments back to the Field Effect portal."

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"In the AROs tab, if we encounter multiple duplicate recommendations, it would be helpful to be able to select and resolve or dismiss them all at once."

"One limitation is that if someone takes their laptop outside the office building, the DNS firewall provides minimal coverage, and we are unable to generate reports."

"I'd love the price to be a little bit less."

More Field Effect MDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Binary Defense MDR is priced competitively and may be slightly lower than CrowdStrike."

"The solution's price is spot on; if anything, it's slightly below the norm for most services. Compared to building the same team internally, it would cost more to create the same amount of capability than what we get from an external team. Price-wise, Binary Defense is in a great spot."

"The pricing isn't that bad, it's very competitive. I don't feel that it's over-priced and I don't feel that it's under-priced."

"After we acquired this platform, we met with a number of different vendors. Binary Defense came in with a proposal that was surprisingly affordable. In fact, we were able to recoup the cost of their services within a short period of time. This is because Binary Defense is able to provide the same level of security as a team of two or three in-house analysts but at a fraction of the cost. As a result, Binary Defense is saving us an estimated $250,000 to $300,000 per year."

"From the initial cost that Binary Defense came in with, we pared it down quite a bit over the course of 30 or 60 days. My leadership would say that their cost was high, but realistically, they were in line with the market."

"Binary Defense has changed its pricing model from being primarily based on the volume of data to one based on escalations and incidents they handle."

"The pricing is very good. They are definitely competitive and they were lower at the time that we went with them."

"It's valued at the right price. Even with the number of endpoints we have, we don't feel that it's a lot more than any competitor. In fact, it might be less expensive when you look at the fact that you're getting a full flex SOC out of it along with the tools."

More Binary Defense MDR pricing and cost advice

"Covalence is cost-effective."

"While the contract duration might change, the pricing remains highly attractive."

"Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"The cost of the solution is high."

"The shift to a per-user pricing model and the introduction of a base price for the on-premises or virtual appliance has been particularly advantageous."

"We were particularly impressed with their pricing model, which charges per user rather than per system."

"While Field Effect Covalence's pricing seems competitive for the market, the biggest hurdle lies in the lack of dedicated security budgets within many organizations."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

41%

Outsourcing Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Binary Defense MDR?

It has been good. We have saved money, and we have a better product. We are a company that has become an enterprise from a small medium business in two years. Our company passed a certain dollar ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Binary Defense MDR?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Binary Defense MDR?

They co-manage our Sentinel SIEM instance, and they provide a Security Operations Center (SOC) with 24/7 coverage. They perform research and remediation. They have a separate team for phishing. Tha...

See all answers

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

One way Field Effect MDR can be improved is through its licensing process, which is not ideal. The licensing process is difficult because I have to access a separate website to complete it.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 10% of the time

Red Canary vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 10% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 9% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 7% of the time

More Binary Defense MDR Competitors

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 10% of the time

CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 7% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR

January 2026

Download Binary Defense MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

January 2026

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Also Known As

Binary Defense Vision, Binary Defense Managed Detection and Response, Binary Defense Managed Detection & Response

Field Effect Covalence

Overview

Binary Defense provides a Managed Detection and Response service using an Open XDR strategy that detects and isolates threats early in the attack lifecycle. Expert security analysts in the Binary Defense Security Operations Center leverage an attacker’s mindset, monitoring your environments for security events 24x7x365 and acting as an extension of your security teams. When a security event occurs, Binary Defense analysts triage, disposition, and prioritize the event. Analysts conduct full kill chain analysis and supply tactical and strategic mitigation recommendations to your security team with the goal of increasing your organization’s security posture against the latest adversary threats.

Visit us online at https://www.binarydefense.com

Binary Defense

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

Sample Customers

Securitas USA, Black Hills Energy, Lincoln Electric,The J.M. Smuckers Company, New York Community Bank, State of Connecticut, NCR

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR

January 2026

Free Report: Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Binary Defense MDR vs. Field Effect MDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.