Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Bitdefender and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Bitdefender is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.3, while Trellix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.9. Bitdefender holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 159 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 9,310 Views
  • 6,238 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR are leaders in the security solutions market, each bringing unique strengths to endpoint protection. Trellix stands out with its robust management capabilities, while Bitdefender is preferred for ease of installation and efficient threat detection.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive suite of features, including Data Loss Prevention (DLP), endpoint encryption, and central management, making it suitable for large enterprises. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is distinguished by its efficient installation process, strong malware detection, and performance optimization for mid-sized organizations.

Room for Improvement: Trellix faces challenges with integration and resource-heavy agents, impacting performance. Users also experience difficulties managing complex configurations. Bitdefender could enhance management features, introduce a cloud console, and improve detection capabilities to better compete with other leaders like SentinelOne.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers various deployment options such as on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, appealing to enterprises needing flexibility. Bitdefender's focus is on public and hybrid cloud options, facilitating scalability. Trellix receives mixed feedback on technical support efficiency, while Bitdefender is recognized for superior customer service and support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is perceived as costly, yet its feature-rich offering is considered worth the investment for some users. Bitdefender provides competitive pricing, appealing to organizations with a larger number of users. Both solutions are noted for delivering positive ROI, translating into fewer security incidents and reduced recovery costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ext...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
38th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
29th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Detection and Response (NDR) (18th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
9th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
159
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.7%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.7%
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)0.5%
Other95.8%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2165952 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2165952
Company Advisor
Automated protection has reduced our management time and keeps all client environments consistently secure
Reporting in Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could be improved. It has some reporting in it, but it's a little cumbersome to work with, so the reporting that is there could be improved. The analytics dashboards of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) are quite useful, and they are nice in that we can see an overview very quickly and drill down into specific issues or specific clients. The dashboards are quite good, though it would be nice if we had the same with automated reports. It would be much more useful for us to have that via email or having a report. The only downside that we find is that the product is a little bit slow.
Read full review
Abhimanyu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Abhimanyu Das
Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.
From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best features in the product, as a reseller, are the integrated SOC; integration with a SOC is one of the advantages."
"The quarantine computer functionality is very good for me."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"The solution has best-in-breed technology and scores very highly on efficacy rates."
"The product is easy to use."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"The threat detection rates are exceptionally good, better than most of the competition."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) pros
"It provides a lot of information and great visibility, with really great options for managing the environment."
"The solution is stable."
"The product has a robust reporting feature"
"Trellix Security Endpoint can promptly isolate any host machines directly from the console. If alerts are received and isolation is necessary, it can be accomplished through the console. The console itself holds significant value, accessible through a browser and allowing remote actions via cloud login."
"The performance is good."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."
"The solution scales well."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros
 

Cons

"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform."
"Reporting in Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could be improved."
"The solution must improve its management features."
"Detection and response is a disadvantage that could be improved."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"I would like automatic issue fixing for users without needing to physically open the PC. I'd prefer updates and fixes from the cloud to avoid headaches and save time."
"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform. Some feedback has been about the deletion of other software not going smoothly during the installation of Bitdefender, particularly the removal of previous software like Sophos."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly. There are multiple solutions and there is no clear line differentiating all of them. There is a centralized console where we manage everything but most of the administrators feel a little confused when it comes to managing multiple products from a single place."
"Patch management is unavailable"
"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have purchased licenses for the use of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus. The price of the solution is reasonable but could be better."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is pretty average, meaning it's not cheaper, but it's pretty good. It has average pricing."
"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."
"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"Its price is reasonable, but it could be made free."
"The product pricing is high."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
"It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Educational Organization
8%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
It's a good price for the solution and for the customer.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
Detection and response is a disadvantage that could be improved. It could be improved by the technical teams of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR). I think the detection ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
I work as a reseller for Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR). My clients are using the Endpoint Risk Analytics feature. I use Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection an...
See all answers
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Darktrace vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 17% of the time
Huntress Managed ITDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Huntress Managed ITDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 9% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Trend Vision One vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 8% of the time
Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 7% of the time
Arista NDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Arista NDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 4% of the time
More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 5% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 5% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 5% of the time
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
January 2026
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reportDownload Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
January 2026
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
 

Also Known As

GravityZone Ultra Plus
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR enhances network security via advanced threat detection, offers centralized incident response, and comprehensive endpoint protection. Users value the user-friendly interface, robust analytics, and streamlined management, significantly boosting organizational efficiency and productivity.
Bitdefender

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
December 2025
Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.