Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo

Top 10 Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Alternatives

Vendor: Bitdefender
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, seamless integration, automated response capabilities, and comprehensive visibility, ensuring superior security and efficient threat management.

Bitdefender Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Bitdefender, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with cloud-native solutions offering complete visibility and real-time response capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stands out for effective threat detection and comprehensive protection measures. CrowdStrike provides advanced features but at a higher cost, while Bitdefender offers more balanced pricing.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment option for businesses exploring extended detection and response solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment option for businesses exploring extended detection and response solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR excels in sophisticated threat detection and automated responses, appealing to those seeking comprehensive security. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source platform supports extensive customization and community support, attracting organizations prioritizing flexibility and budget considerations.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Wazuh Report
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves a higher setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more economical initial setup. This highlights the upfront investment difference between these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves a higher setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more economical initial setup. This highlights the upfront investment difference between these cybersecurity solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint integrates smoothly with Windows and Azure, offering effective threat detection. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR excels in advanced threat detection and customization. Defender for Endpoint benefits Microsoft ecosystems, while GravityZone XDR's superior threat management justifies its higher price.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has lower setup costs, offering significant savings for businesses, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has higher initial setup expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has lower setup costs, offering significant savings for businesses, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has higher initial setup expenses.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace delivers AI-driven threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing autonomous response. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers in-depth security with customization, suitable for complex environments. Bitdefender attracts tech buyers with its flexibility, while Darktrace impresses with rapid deployment and strong customer support.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Darktrace Report
Darktrace's setup cost is considerable, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace's setup cost is considerable, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is preferred for its real-time threat detection and automated response, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stands out with robust AI-driven analysis and comprehensive threat intelligence. FortiEDR offers straightforward deployment, while GravityZone XDR excels in seamless cloud-based setup.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a straightforward setup process, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR presents more flexible initial cost options. Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its predictable pricing, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is praised for customization and affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a straightforward setup process, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR presents more flexible initial cost options. Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its predictable pricing, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is praised for customization and affordability.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers autonomous response and real-time threat detection. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides comprehensive detection algorithms and integration capabilities. SentinelOne is known for ease of deployment and customer service, while Bitdefender is recognized for its extensive features and better ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) offers a more economical setup expense. SentinelOne's price point includes comprehensive features, distinguishing it from the more cost-effective Bitdefender sol...
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) offers a more economical setup expense. SentinelOne's price point includes comprehensive features, distinguishing it from the more cost-effective Bitdefender sol...
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in machine learning, stability, and integration with systems like Active Directory, ideal for enterprises needing robust features. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone offers solid endpoint detection, making it suitable for smaller businesses prioritizing cost-effective and easy cloud deployment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar presents a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost difference highlights IBM's focus on extensive features versus Bitdefender's emphasis on accessibility.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar presents a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost difference highlights IBM's focus on extensive features versus Bitdefender's emphasis on accessibility.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers robust malware protection and ease of integration, making it a cost-effective choice with solid ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides advanced threat detection and response features, justifying its higher cost with comprehensive security and high value.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) has a moderate setup cost. HP Wolf Security is more affordable upfront compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) has a moderate setup cost. HP Wolf Security is more affordable upfront compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR offers robust threat detection with competitive pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR excels in automation and threat intelligence. Cortex XDR is suited for those prioritizing affordability, while Bitdefender appeals to those seeking advanced features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks often involves higher setup costs compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, highlighting a potential difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks often involves higher setup costs compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, highlighting a potential difference in initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR excels in advanced threat detection and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR offers extensive threat intelligence and comprehensive features. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR attracts cost-conscious buyers, while Microsoft Defender XDR appeals to those prioritizing advanced features and integration.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is noted for its reasonable setup cost while Microsoft Defender XDR users report a higher initial expense. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR users appreciate its cost-effectiveness during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is noted for its reasonable setup cost while Microsoft Defender XDR users report a higher initial expense. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR users appreciate its cost-effectiveness during implementation.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix provides a comprehensive suite with features like DLP and endpoint encryption, ideal for unified security, along with various deployment options. In comparison, Bitdefender XDR offers easier setup and competitive detection rates, making it appealing for those valuing simplicity and quick deployment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a lower setup cost than Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a lower setup cost than Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
TrendAI Vision One excels with comprehensive security capabilities and centralized management, attracting those seeking robust threat assessment. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers ease of use and seamless integration, appealing to buyers needing automated responses and competitive pricing in existing systems.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One Report
TrendAI Vision One features a lower setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is positioned as a premium offering with a more significant initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
TrendAI Vision One features a lower setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is positioned as a premium offering with a more significant initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced security with firewall integration, ideal for complex threat landscapes. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR focuses on detection and response, making it suitable for behavioral analytics. Check Point is premium, while Bitdefender offers better affordability for larger deployments.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Vectra AI impresses with competitive pricing and superior customer service, highlighting strong threat detection. In comparison, Bitdefender XDR's comprehensive endpoint protection and efficient integration appeal to tech buyers seeking robust features, though it carries higher costs. Vectra AI's simplicity contrasts with Bitdefender's broader ecosystem security integration.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Vectra AI Report
Vectra AI has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, which may affect budget considerations depending on the users' financial priorities.
View comparison
Pricing
Vectra AI has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, which may affect budget considerations depending on the users' financial priorities.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business excels at malware detection and device control, attracting budget-conscious organizations with competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers superior threat detection and integrated response capabilities, justifying its higher cost for those needing extensive detection tools.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a moderate setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) has a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a moderate setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) has a higher initial expense.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
The comparison between Lookout and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR shows Lookout excels in mobile device management, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR presents advanced threat hunting capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender's extensive integrations and proactive analytics indicate a more sophisticated offering. Lookout's straightforward deployment contrasts with Bitdefender's higher ROI perceptions.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Lookout Report
Lookout has a minimal setup cost, making it highly accessible, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves a more significant initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout has a minimal setup cost, making it highly accessible, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves a more significant initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet is favored for competitive pricing, automation, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is chosen for advanced threat detection, predictive analytics, and extensive global support. Tech buyers might choose Cynet for cost-effectiveness and simplicity, whereas Bitdefender attracts those needing comprehensive protection and are willing to invest more.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Cynet Report
Cynet setup costs are generally lower with minimal upfront fees, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet setup costs are generally lower with minimal upfront fees, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint offers robust threat detection, ransomware protection, and exploit prevention. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR delivers comprehensive threat intelligence and advanced visualization tools. Intercept X Endpoint stands out for deployment ease and support, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides extensive features and higher protection capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Intercept X Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has a slightly higher initial expense. Intercept X users find the one-click deployment useful, whereas Bitdefender users appreciate the comprehensive onboarding support.
View comparison
Pricing
Intercept X Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has a slightly higher initial expense. Intercept X users find the one-click deployment useful, whereas Bitdefender users appreciate the comprehensive onboarding support.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has the upper hand in pricing and support. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR stands out for its superior features and is considered worth the higher price. Bitdefender is praised for its automated response, while WatchGuard excels in seamless integration and threat hunting.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR often reports higher setup costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its more economical setup expense. Users note a significant cost disparity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR often reports higher setup costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its more economical setup expense. Users note a significant cost disparity between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with advanced analytics and integrations. Its valuable features include AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Some users point to room for improvement in deployment processes and customizability to better align with diverse industry needs.

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Datto EDR offers quick deployment and effective customer service, appealing to those seeking simplicity. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides advanced threat analytics and superior AI-based detection, suitable for buyers desiring comprehensive features and extensive protection. Pricing favors Datto; features favor Bitdefender.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Datto EDR has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto EDR has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves higher initial setup costs.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in real-time network threat detection, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers comprehensive endpoint protection. In comparison, users find Bitdefender GravityZone XDR's integrated features highly valuable. Tech buyers might choose NetWitness NDR for scalability or Bitdefender GravityZone XDR for seamless deployment and technical support.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. NetWitness NDR Report
For NetWitness NDR, setup costs are indicated as moderate while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) setup costs are described as low. The primary distinction lies in NetWitness' higher setup expense compared to Bitdefender GravityZone's more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
For NetWitness NDR, setup costs are indicated as moderate while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) setup costs are described as low. The primary distinction lies in NetWitness' higher setup expense compared to Bitdefender GravityZone's more budget-friendly setup.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender features excellent threat detection and integration with minimal performance impact. In comparison, Kaspersky offers competitive pricing and effective customer support. Kaspersky users note the need for better integration, while Bitdefender users seek enhanced reporting. Each provides unique advantages depending on business priorities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) offers a more budget-friendly option.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint excels in log management and customizability, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stands out with robust threat detection, prevention, and response mechanisms. In comparison, Logpoint's competitive pricing and straightforward deployment appeal to cost-conscious users, while Bitdefender's extensive protection justifies its higher investment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Logpoint Report
Logpoint incurs a higher initial setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint incurs a higher initial setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
ESET PROTECT Enterprise
4.4 out of 5
ESET PROTECT Enterprise offers robust endpoint protection and efficient threat detection with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides advanced threat analytics and comprehensive features, presenting a higher upfront cost but delivering superior long-term value in versatility and security.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. ESET PROTECT Enterprise Report
ESET PROTECT Enterprise typically offers lower setup costs, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR may incur higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET PROTECT Enterprise typically offers lower setup costs, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR may incur higher initial expenses.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5

ESET PROTECT Elite is an all-in-one prevention, detection & response combining enterprise-grade XDR with complete multilayered protection.

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. ESET EDR/XDR Report
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
View comparison
Pricing
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Open EDR provides robust threat detection and response capabilities, offering valuable features for data security, including real-time analysis and customizable alerts. Users appreciate its extensive integration options. However, improvements in documentation and better customer support would enhance its user experience.
View comparison
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Arista NDR
4.5 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Arista NDR
4.5 out of 5
Arista NDR is ideal for those valuing network-centric threat analysis with advanced detection. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR attracts tech buyers needing comprehensive endpoint and network security with competitive pricing, offering quick setup and response capabilities.
Download Arista NDR vs. Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report
Arista NDR setup cost involves significant investment, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR setup is relatively budget-friendly. This highlights a notable difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Arista NDR setup cost involves significant investment, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR setup is relatively budget-friendly. This highlights a notable difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Lumu
4.6 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Lumu
4.6 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers competitive pricing and superior support, appealing to those seeking affordable cybersecurity solutions. In comparison, Lumu's advanced threat intelligence and adaptability justify its higher cost, attracting buyers focused on cutting-edge features and comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Lumu Report
The setup cost for Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is higher compared to Lumu, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is higher compared to Lumu, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers real-time threat intelligence and automation for streamlined security management. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides robust threat detection using machine learning and behavioral analysis, offering advanced AI-driven features that users feel justify its higher cost.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a straightforward and lower setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR), offering an economical alternative. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more comprehensive setup, reflecting its ext...
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a straightforward and lower setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR), offering an economical alternative. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more comprehensive setup, reflecting its ext...

Related categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Network Detection and Response (NDR)