No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Blackboard Collaborate vs Microsoft Teams comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Blackboard Collaborate
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
180
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Blackboard Collaborate is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams3.8%
Blackboard Collaborate2.2%
Other94.0%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

YN
Teaching and Learning Systems Manager at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Useful in webinars, meetings and online classrooms
One of the features that people enjoy is the whiteboard, providing opportunities for academics to present content and for students to contribute. The platform also allows for the creating of different rooms, enabling large classes to break into smaller groups for discussions. Students can then return to the main classroom to share their opinions. It integrates with LMS.
Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
Have streamlined daily workflow and task management but still face inconvenience from recent interface changes and limited integration options
There are challenges and issues in Microsoft Teams, such as after recent updates where group chats were combined with Teams, chats, and groups into one. Users have to work with settings to make it normal again so Teams are separated from chats, and that was a really inconvenient update. Many users ask me to help make it back again to separate Teams and groups from one-to-one chats. That's probably the worst update they've made recently. Additionally, there are some minor features, such as when I work with messages, I don't have an actual forward or quote option when replying to someone's message. I need to be careful not to miss the quote sign. For a lot of people, they are confused about where the quotes option is. I've received a couple of hundred support tickets just regarding this issue. The function to share email to Teams chat doesn't work sometimes due to our compliance policies, and sometimes it would be nice to be able to forward an email to the group chat and have further discussions. Microsoft Teams could improve by being less glitchy because it glitches a lot, leading to undelivered emails and undelivered messages. It would be beneficial if the MS application Shifts, which adds functionality to groups, could be integrated into the groups calendar. Currently, many teams don't use the app because it is not integrated with the general calendar or the Outlook calendar, making it basically a useless application. The platform needs less Copilot and more people. The general Copilot integration into the platform is less glitchy, but Microsoft Teams is quite heavy and glitchy sometimes. Stability depends a lot on compliance restrictions, policies, and quality of internet. Sometimes, when updates are enrolling, the platform glitches, breaks, or shuts down.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Document loading and annotation."
"The software is easy to use, has clear navigation and structure, and is highly customizable from an administrators standpoint (I've administered and used it as a client)."
"The solution allows me to connect and collaborate with student live time, or asynchronously."
"One of the features that people enjoy is the whiteboard, providing opportunities for academics to present content and for students to contribute. The platform also allows for the creating of different rooms, enabling large classes to break into smaller groups for discussions. Students can then return to the main classroom to share their opinions. It integrates with LMS."
"This solution has provided an additional way to connect with students and they feel like it allows for participation in a variety of ways."
"The feature I find to be the most valuable is the integration with document management capabilities and video conferencing, screen sharing, etc."
"This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing."
"Everything is valuable, such as the chats, the calls, and the file sharing."
"The solution's technical support team is helpful."
"The initial setup was really straightforward and easy."
"I am impressed with the solution's collaboration with Office 365."
"It's easy to share information and upload and download files on Microsoft Teams."
"I think the collaborating feature is valuable."
 

Cons

"We faced outages when the user limit went over a certain number."
"I occasionally had difficulties logging in because I think that the system was overloaded with too many people."
"Originally, I was disappointed in behavior of the early Ultra version. It did not exhibit to students what I am showing on my own machine."
"If there were maybe more tutorials outside of what I'm aware the university is suggesting, I would take more tutorials on effective ways to deliver content. I come from the industry and content was always needed when people that were observing were smart and involved and decision-makers instead of so passively just trying to pass the course. In my imagination, the tutorials would be a tool where the learners themselves can have much more hands-on learning during a Collaborate session."
"The system can overload when too many try logging in."
"I wish I could upload assignments from my Android tablet or iPhone, but I guarantee that specific feature is in the works."
"Microsoft Teams can start being more interactive and intuitive by implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"Its screen-sharing feature could be better compared to a few competitors."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
"We occasionally have issues with synchronization between different dates. This aspect of stability needs improvement."
"It would be better if Microsoft Teams can link us to the internet on the screen sharing mode during the meeting."
"There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues."
"The solution is very expensive and I won't be able to afford it personally."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution."
"The product is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."
"The standalone license is not cheap."
"It is a bit more than moderately expensive."
"It is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products."
"In our experience, pricing may differ from country to country, with some regions offering more favorable rates due to local payment arrangements."
"The product is expensive."
"The pricing for Teams is very competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise75
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Pricing for Microsoft Teams has been good so far. My team does not manage Microsoft Teams pricing or how the licensing is being done, but I know there is a Microsoft E3 license that gives you acces...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
The only thing that frustrates me using Microsoft Teams is where I'm not able to properly integrate some applications, such as some chatbots, to Microsoft Teams. Apart from that, Microsoft Teams ha...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
My main use case for Microsoft Teams is for chats and meetings, majorly to schedule meetings, and those are the major things for chat and to schedule meetings. A recent scenario where I typically u...
 

Also Known As

Blackboard Mobile
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

University of Derby Online, Universty of Warwick, University of Liverpool, City College Norwich, Northumberland College, Mid-Kent College, Watson Pharmaceutials, Capella University, Shore Tel Sky, Lincoln PD, City of Somerville MA, Somerset County Council
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Blackboard Collaborate vs. Microsoft Teams and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.