Cisco Meraki Systems Manager and BMC Helix Client Management compete in the endpoint management category. Cisco Meraki appears to have an advantage due to its robust cloud-based features and ease of deployment.
Features: Cisco Meraki Systems Manager offers cloud-based device management with features like geofencing, remote wiping, and app deployment, all accessible via a centralized dashboard. It provides real-time data and insights for security and network performance. BMC Helix Client Management delivers comprehensive endpoint management across various operating systems, offering strong remote control capabilities and compliance management, supplemented by detailed inventory and software deployment features.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Systems Manager could improve its advanced configuration flexibility, Linux compatibility, and scripting capabilities. Users also report high costs and a need for better integration with non-Apple devices and technical support. BMC Helix Client Management needs enhancements in mobile device management, vulnerability assessment tools, and better support for additional OS platforms, as well as improved remote access capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is noted for its flexibility in deployment across public and hybrid clouds, providing easy remote access. Customer service is generally reliable but expensive. BMC Helix Client Management focuses on strong on-premises deployment, effectively managing diverse endpoint environments with reliable technical support, though some integrations are missing.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Systems Manager has higher pricing compared to competitors, but users recognize its value for remote management. Licensing is per device, which can be costly for multiple users. BMC Helix Client Management is considered more affordable, with endpoint-based pricing that offers good performance value. Both report positive ROI, with Cisco Meraki enhancing efficiency through significant remote management benefits.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) | 5.9% |
BMC Client Management | 4.1% |
Other | 90.0% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 16 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 13 |
BMC Helix Client Management offers comprehensive features for efficient oversight of enterprise technology, enhancing security compliance, and ensuring effective software audits.
With capabilities like patch management, software license administration, and remote control, BMC Helix Client Management is vital for remote troubleshooting and maintaining compliance during software audits. Users value the ability to manage diverse operating systems, leveraging inventory management, software deployment, and endpoint management. However, there is a need for improved Linux patching support, better integration, and expanded remote access functionality. Offering its vulnerability assessment scanning and enhanced endpoint management would be beneficial. A more robust discovery tool is required for better compliance and insights, suggesting a transition to a web-based platform.
What are the standout features of BMC Helix Client Management?BMC Helix Client Management is instrumental across industries for deploying software, ensuring compliance, and managing security remotely. Organizations use it for software compliance, automating desktop processes, and detailed inventory management, significantly contributing to efficiency and compliance with licensing standards.
Every user is unique. Every device, a bit different. Systems Manager keeps the network in the loop about constantly changing devices, automatically tracking device posture and adjusting security policies to match.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.