CA CEM [EOL] vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 91% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution.

CA CEM [EOL]

Read 1 CA CEM [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 275 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

37,017 Views
28,133 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CA CEM [EOL]

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

CA CEM [EOL] and Splunk AppDynamics compete in the application performance management category. Splunk AppDynamics appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall offering.

Features: CA CEM [EOL] focuses on network-based application monitoring, emphasizing end-user experience through detailed transaction analysis. Splunk AppDynamics offers a comprehensive APM suite, including real-time application monitoring, application mapping, and robust capabilities for complex environments. Splunk AppDynamics is more feature-rich and appeals to businesses that need extensive functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA CEM [EOL] provides straightforward deployment but may require additional support due to a learning curve. Splunk AppDynamics offers a streamlined deployment process with comprehensive guides and support, allowing quicker implementation. Splunk AppDynamics provides superior ease of deployment and customer service.

Pricing and ROI: CA CEM [EOL] generally offers a lower initial setup cost, appealing to price-sensitive businesses. Splunk AppDynamics, while higher priced, is seen as a better long-term investment with greater ROI potential due to its extensive capabilities. Splunk AppDynamics often delivers better value over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA CEM [EOL]

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

275

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user305787

Tech Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs.

It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance We've found that it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs. It's difficult to segregate…

Read full review

Shamim Alsharif

Performance Test Engineer at TANIM CONSULTING, LLC

Real-time monitoring has improved our banking API performance and supports detailed business transaction analysis

The real-time monitoring is what we can see for anything that is needed in terms of CPU, memory, or the connections or the sessions related. It's real-time monitoring of performance of each of the components, which is what we need and use all the time. It's highly effective, I would say. Infrastructure visibility, transaction monitoring, to check the actual user experience in terms of the response time, MRT and all those things. We do the component monitoring like the API performance and the connections and all those things, but we also do the business process monitoring and business transaction monitoring.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance."

"I think the performance and interface are the most important features."

"The most valuable feature is the flow map."

"It was a game changer right out the door."

"We've been able to triage and diagnose problems sooner and proactively tell the teams involved if there have been lags in their performances, so they could look into them before there are any errors in production."

"When it comes to end-user monitoring (where you want to capture or trend back business transactions, or where you want to really view the performance of the tools), it's not just good in terms of managing your production system, but some of the developers use it to tackle performance issues and get ahead."

"You have a live view of what happens when something goes wrong on the production or support side. You don't have to scramble and do guesswork. We can identify the query that creates the bottleneck or slows the performance of the database system. It can give you points on how to debug and fix the system."

"We have found the scalability to be quite good."

"What I like best about AppDynamics is that it's functional, particularly in APM in Java and .NET."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"In our experience, technical support has been slow. We’ve been plagued with hardware issues, which have been on-going for a long time and which is going through CA to a separate partner, who then needs to deal with another local partner company for hardware."

"AppDyanmics requires better technical people to support the solution."

"The infrastructure is not as good as other solutions."

"The configuration is tricky and requires a lot of tools."

"Aternity is a better solution for internet monitoring, so that is an area that could be improved."

"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."

"One of the things that we would like to improve a little more is the dashboards. The dashboards are good, but I believe that they could improve even more."

"I haven’t rated the product higher basically because of the synthetic monitoring piece."

"Splunk AppDynamics could improve their installation process, which would be an incredible thing on Splunk AppDynamics' side."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a very expensive product, but if you negotiate well, you get value for money...My company used to make early payments toward the licensing costs of the solution, but now my company has opted for a different licensing model."

"There is a license to use this solution. However, the clients pay for the licenses we are the service provider."

"We buy the platform's yearly subscription."

"AppDynamics is one of the most expensive solutions on the market."

"AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring does have licensing cost associated with it."

"I rate AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring's pricing as seven out of ten. Mobile monitoring is paid based on the number of instances utilizing the mobile monitoring service, which increases as the scale grows. Consequently, your mobile user count can proportionally surpass all other applications."

"The product is a bit expensive compared to other tools."

"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	64
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	206

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

The price is not cheap, however, considering the benefits and the price ratio, I would rate it nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Based on my experience, some databases like Couchbase, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB require a little bit of enhancement as they are newer and not as widely used as other databases. The limitations are o...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC TrueSight vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText Diagnostics vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Monitor vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

More CA CEM [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download CA CEM [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

August 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

CEM

No data available

Overview

CA Customer Experience Manager (CA CEM) is a product within the Application Performance Management solution that measures web application performance for each individual customer. CA CEM measures the performance and quality of customer transactions, identifies defects and variance, and quantifies the impact on customers and the business. CA CEM lets you monitor real user activities -- including login, account update, or purchase transactions -- at the business service level. By proactively detecting trends in degraded customer transaction response times and providing various actionable reports, CA CEM lets you act before problems occur or SLAs are out of compliance. These capabilities enable both your business managers and IT staff to understand and resolve performance problems before end users call for support.

Broadcom

Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.

Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.

What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?

End-to-End Transaction Tracking: Monitors entire user transactions for comprehensive visibility.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insights into system performance.
AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: Identifies anomalies with advanced machine learning techniques.
Code-Level Troubleshooting: Diagnoses issues at the code level for precise fixes.
Business Transaction Visibility: Offers detailed views into transaction flow across all system layers.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Splunk AppDynamics?

Improved Application Performance: Enhances system efficiency and reliability.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and issue resolution processes.
Enhanced Business Resilience: Strengthens the ability to adapt to performance challenges.
Seamless User Experiences: Ensures uninterrupted service and user satisfaction.

Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.

Splunk

Sample Customers

First Horizon National Corporation, Olympus, Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago LimitedŒ _Petrotrinî, Racing and Wagering Western Australia

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.