CA Deliver vs Looker Studio comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Google are both solutions in the Reporting category. Broadcom is ranked #32, while Google is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Broadcom holds a 1.0% mindshare in RT, compared to Google’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Google users who would recommend it.

CA Deliver

Read 3 CA Deliver reviews

1,097 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Looker Studio

Read 16 Looker Studio reviews

4,439 Views
2,930 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CA Deliver

Looker Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

CA Deliver and Looker Studio compete in the data management and visualization category. Looker Studio appears to have the upper hand with its advanced analytical capabilities and data exploration tools, while CA Deliver is preferred for its budget-friendly pricing and reliable support.

Features: CA Deliver is proficient in automated report distribution, integration with legacy systems, and handling high-volume environments. Looker Studio stands out with advanced data exploration tools, real-time data connection, and comprehensive analytical functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Deliver has a traditional deployment model supported by extensive documentation and personalized support. Looker Studio offers a cloud-based deployment that simplifies integration but relies on internet stability. Its customer service incorporates digital touchpoints.

Pricing and ROI: CA Deliver requires a traditional investment path, often resulting in quicker ROI due to its focus on data management efficiency. Looker Studio utilizes a subscription-based model, suggesting higher initial costs but potentially greater ROI through enhanced data insights.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Deliver vs. Looker Studio Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. Looker Studio

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Deliver

Ranking in Reporting

32nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Looker Studio

Ranking in Reporting

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of CA Deliver is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Looker Studio is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Looker Studio	2.5%
CA Deliver	1.0%
Other	96.5%

Reporting

Featured Reviews

it_user837525

Senior Systems Engineer (Sr. level II) at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Gives us one repository for various output formats and retention periods

A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. Much like other technology companies that have fallen into this trap, let feature and compatibly releases be controlled by the technical group, instead of the marketing and/or management people. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not. I have been doing this for 37 years and see it all too often, sometimes to the detriment of the company itself (Storage Technology Corp. and its Iceberg array comes to mind).

Read full review

Heron Ziegel

Project Engineer at Quartz Consulting Group

Has supported quick dashboard creation and data sharing but lacks tools for managing multiple reports efficiently

We integrated Looker Studio with other platforms in our data ecosystem; we tried integrating with Sheets, and that went okay, but it could have been better. It could have been better because it needed a very specific format to read the data, so we had to reformat the sheet file. Looker Studio was mostly just helpful in that it provided live updating charts for tracking performance indicators in the organization. Integrating with a database was very difficult because there wasn't a lot of feedback for what was going wrong with the connection. I don't remember if we reached out to support. I didn't personally reach out, but my boss may have. I didn't reach out to support, so I do not have experience with it to rate it. We worked with the free version of Looker Studio initially, and we upgraded at some point to the pro version; I don't remember if we actually paid for it or if it was just a free trial. The pricing was reasonable. I remember doing a price comparison, and it was pretty reasonable, but it did have fewer features than a lot of other software, which was okay for a comparable price but a little cheaper.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flexibility of report configuration; allows for quick and simple amendments to definitions."

"Extremely stable and reliable, and easy to install."

"Having one repository for various output formats and retention periods. Provides the flexibility to establish hundreds of different retention entries, based upon business need, and then group the like retention period outputs together on the same media. It is very efficient."

"The benefits are that it keeps their information for over 40 to 50 years, so in essence it's a digital bank for customer information."

"What I appreciate about Looker Studio is mostly the clean visuals, which is good, as I prefer a dashboard with a clean aesthetic rather than feeling sort of an old Windows type of dashboard."

"The solution is free so that is a good feature."

"The ability to integrate with a great variety of data sources."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its ease of use and the plethora of query sources."

"I am impressed with the tool's scheduling mechanism, refresh mechanism, and different types of charts."

"Data Studio integrates seamlessly with other Google products, and we can use it with other APIs if we like."

"This is a great tool if your organization leverages other sets of Google tools and needs some quick ideas that are a prettier and more interactive than Google Analytics."

"The company dashboard is useful because we could share it via a link as a reminder for everyone to check it weekly. We observed the progress of our portfolio from last week to the current week, allowing us to compare revenues."

More Looker Studio pros

Cons

"A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not."

"I work with the developers so I get what I want built into the project."

"Needs ability to allow export to xls/pdf, etc. (Note: this is available in add-on product CA – OM Web Viewer)."

"Looker Studio did not fit our needs for scalability."

"There are issues with integration and I encountered limits and warnings, especially with my pivot table size."

"The challenges with Google Data Studio are associated with the security part, making it an area where improvements are required."

"I would appreciate improvements in the data modeling features, as it's not straightforward, and it's not what people in analytics are used to."

"When you physically install a product on one machine instead of the cloud, you have a better visibility, best icon quality, etc.. It's more of an issue with how we are adapting to the transition. We are still in the early moments of using this tool, and we need to go deeper to discover some improvements."

"Insisting on forums, blogs and community outreach in communications, and posting videos on an established calendar would be useful."

"The tool has a lot of room for improvement. It's not very professional and allows for only simple tasks like indicating KPIs or quick calculations. It lacks a good calculation-based language like Power BI's DAX, making it less suitable for professional use. Additionally, the variety of visualization tools is limited, and customization options are restricted."

"Stability and scalability an be improved for a full ten."

More Looker Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable, licensing model suitable for large enterprises."

"The solution is free but the Google Looker is expensive."

"I think the tool is cheap because you don't need to pay anything for using the tool. However, when connecting and analyzing other data sources, you should consider where to analyze this information because Google Data Studio doesn't handle much data well. You must also consider how you will connect this data to it. In this case, you might need to hire DevOps or a data team to help with these issues."

"The tool is free."

"The cost is quite affordable based on feature analysis."

"The product is available for free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Google Data Studio?

I would appreciate improvements in the data modeling features, as it's not straightforward, and it's not what people in analytics are used to. Specifically, most people using this visualization too...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Data Studio?

I used Looker Studio mainly for reporting, where I created multiple dashboards on it. I wouldn't say I made the most of the usage of the connections because all the connections were based on flat f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Data Studio?

I confirm that we have a call regarding my experience with Zoho. Looker Studio is a good visualization tool, but I wouldn't say there's a specific feature that stands out in terms of tracking metri...

See all answers

Comparisons

Domo vs CA Deliver

Compared 19% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs CA Deliver

Compared 18% of the time

eCourier vs CA Deliver

Compared 10% of the time

Zoho Analytics vs CA Deliver

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer vs CA Deliver

Compared 3% of the time

More CA Deliver Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs Looker Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Looker Studio

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs Looker Studio

Compared 7% of the time

RStudio Connect vs Looker Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Zendesk vs Looker Studio

Compared 5% of the time

More Looker Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Reporting

October 2026

Download CA Deliver product report

Buyer's Guide

Looker Studio

October 2026

Download Looker Studio product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Studio

Overview

CA Deliver facilitates reliable automated report management and distribution, ensuring streamlined operations across enterprises. Its efficiency in handling complex report workflows aids in maintaining accuracy and productivity.

In-depth report management is critical in today's digital landscape, which is why CA Deliver has become an essential tool for businesses aiming to enhance their document handling. It operates by seamlessly automating the report distribution process, improving speed and efficiency. Companies rely on its robust infrastructure to ensure reports are delivered correctly and efficiently, meeting business requirements swiftly.

What are the key features of CA Deliver?

Automated Report Distribution: Streamlines the process, reducing manual intervention
Report Archiving: Securely stores documents for future reference
Flexible Scheduling: Allows tailored report delivery timing to align with business needs
Integration Capabilities: Easily fits into existing IT ecosystems

What benefits should you consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual reporting tasks
Cost-Effectiveness: Minimizes resource allocation for report distribution
Enhanced Accuracy: Lowers risk of errors in report handling
Scalability: Adapts as organizational needs evolve

CA Deliver is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, allowing tailored report management solutions that align with sector-specific requirements. It fosters improved compliance, operational efficiency, and data integrity, supporting industry-specific regulatory challenges and reporting demands.

Broadcom

Looker Studio offers seamless integration with Google products, supporting business visualization and collaboration through efficient data management and analytics, catering to teams aiming for quick analytics solutions.

Looker Studio combines diverse data source integration including SQL and MongoDB with powerful visualization and custom filter creation. Users find its visuals clean and its platform user-friendly, enhanced by collaboration features and pricing. It aids decision-making and is popular for tracking metrics and analyzing sales funnels. Despite its strengths, users seek faster report loading, simpler data modeling, and better interface usability. Advertising system limitations, delayed data reflections, and integration challenges affect performance. Security and stability improvements alongside a richer data modeling layer are desirable, with pricing impacting large organizations.

What are the most important features of Looker Studio?

Google Integration: Easily integrates with Google products for efficient workflow.
Diverse Data Sources: Connects to databases like SQL and MongoDB.
Custom Filters: Offers flexible filter options for tailored analyses.
Data Visualization: Enables powerful, clear visual data representation.
Collaboration: Supports team collaboration for shared insights.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Accessibility and user-friendly operation for teams.
Decision-Making Support: Facilitates informed business decisions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business analytics needs.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing for budget-conscious teams.

Looker Studio supports business visualization for different industries, creating dashboards and reports for sales and marketing analysis. It's used to track metrics and sales funnels from sources like Google Sheets and BigQuery. Many companies integrate Looker Studio within web apps, providing data insights tailored to sectors such as e-commerce, finance, and more.

Google

Sample Customers

ERGO

Genesys, Shueisha

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. Looker Studio

September 2026

Free Report: CA Deliver vs. Looker Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Deliver vs. Looker Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Deliver vs. Looker Studio report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.