CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Spiceworks comparison

Broadcom and Spiceworks are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #60, while Spiceworks is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Spiceworks’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Spiceworks users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

2,046 Views
1,228 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Spiceworks

Read 47 Spiceworks reviews

4,768 Views
1,955 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Spiceworks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Spiceworks and CA Unified Communications Monitor compete in the IT management software space. Data comparisons suggest CA Unified Communications Monitor has the upper hand due to its advanced features, making it suitable for robust capabilities.

Features: Spiceworks includes inventory management, help desk capabilities, and straightforward asset management. CA Unified Communications Monitor provides communication monitoring, detailed analytics, and insights for complex networks.

Room for Improvement: Spiceworks can improve by adding advanced features, enhancing scalability, and providing more professional support options. CA Unified Communications Monitor may benefit from a simpler deployment process, a community-driven support system, and cost-effective solutions for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spiceworks offers simple deployment and community support, making it accessible to small and medium-sized businesses. CA Unified Communications Monitor provides structured deployment and professional support, valuable for managing extensive networks efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: Spiceworks is a cost-effective solution with minimal setup costs, ideal for smaller businesses with a free model offering basic features and ROI. CA Unified Communications Monitor has a higher setup cost but offers greater ROI through comprehensive monitoring capabilities necessary for enterprises seeking advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Spiceworks Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Spiceworks

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

60th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (89th)

Spiceworks

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

43rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (14th), IT Asset Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spiceworks is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Spiceworks	0.7%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Rohit Samel

Account Manager Enterprise Sales at Navdeep Technologies Pvt.Ltd

Cloud storage with no hardware needed and great comprehensive reports

The software is cloud-based, so I do not need to store any data locally. It is a fully software-based solution, eliminating the need for investment in hardware. We have the capability to create reports as needed. It is good software to use, as there were no incidents where I needed to contact technical support. Additionally, it is free software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"Spiceworks is a great, free product, and any IT department that doesn't have a solid help-desk/knowledge-base solution would be amiss not to implement it."

"The price, as it's free."

"It lets us know whether devices are getting out of date and tracked warranties. Spiceworks also gave me visibility in terms of what software was installed on each device and its status."

"We have taken this from a central location and expanded our reach over 8 different companies with around 1000 devices all reporting to one location, and I have had no issues and do not foresee any as we continue to expand and install SpiceWorks at our remaining customers."

"After the software got deployed it all became much faster, easier and more organized."

"Tracking common issues has been improved."

"The solution can find all asset details automatically, whether it's a Mac address, computer name, IP address, models, etc. It's very helpful."

"ROI is great as the software is free."

More Spiceworks pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"I am unable to provide suggestions for improvement at this moment."

"Right now, if you have >2000 endpoints in Spiceworks, you will probably hate using it just because it's so bogged down."

"Once a device was recognized on the network, Spiceworks never got rid of it even after you took it off the network. You had to go in and manually remove it."

"Most problems are the system bugs and slowness, also because the product has a web interface that makes a lot of problems like refreshing and information loss."

"The area I have always struggled with is the network scanning and asset management parts of the program."

"The GUI must be improved."

"On larger networks, performance can be slow."

"Having an integrated asset management tool, where I can plug in things that are offline, would be good."

More Spiceworks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's free."

"Seeing that it is a low-cost solution, I would advise you to go ahead with Spiceworks and experiment with it to see if you can get things working properly, especially if you currently don't have any existing service desk software in place."

"The tool is cheap."

"The product is free! Get it now."

"It might be about $300 annually for a bigger company. If you pay annually, it's better and cheaper."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Spiceworks?

I am unable to provide suggestions for improvement at this moment, however, I can provide feedback later. Currently, there do not seem to be any issues.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spiceworks?

If our customers need backup support, we can work with them and provide it. Whatever solution the customer requires, we will ensure it is provided.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spiceworks?

It performs its intended functions. We may use it, but perhaps not for ourselves, but for our customers, potentially with Channel Partners. Whenever we are posting any query or reply on a ticket, i...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

ServiceNow vs Spiceworks

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Spiceworks

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs Spiceworks

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Spiceworks

Compared 5% of the time

Lansweeper vs Spiceworks

Compared 5% of the time

More Spiceworks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

June 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Spiceworks

May 2026

Download Spiceworks product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

Spiceworks is a freeware IT management tool offering efficient ticketing systems and inventory management with Active Directory integration, making it user-friendly and effective for network monitoring.

Spiceworks supports IT teams with device management and network visibility through strong community backing, ease of use, and comprehensive features like reporting and asset tracking. Its cost-effectiveness is attractive, though users seek improvements such as more customization, better ticketing, enhanced stability, and improved integration capabilities. Security, performance, and scalability are key focuses for enhancement.

What are the key features of Spiceworks?

Ticketing System: Simplifies incident logging and service requests.
Inventory Management: Tracks IT assets efficiently.
Network Monitoring: Offers reliable network oversight.
Active Directory Integration: Seamless integration for user management.
Community Support: Access to troubleshooting and insights.
Reporting: Facilitates in-depth analysis through reports.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers expenses for IT management.
Ease of Integration: Fits smoothly into existing systems.
Improved IT Support: Enhances incident response and monitoring.
Global Collaboration: Facilitates network management across locations.
Resource Efficiency: Streamlines operational tasks for IT teams.

In many industries, Spiceworks is utilized for managing infrastructure, facilitating network oversight, and documenting IT services. Teams efficiently manage networks globally, monitor devices like routers and switches, and provide IT support without reliance on managed service vendors, making integration straightforward.

Spiceworks

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Broward Center for the Performing Arts, Symantec, Webroot, EMC, Pertino

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Spiceworks

June 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Spiceworks

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Spiceworks and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Spiceworks report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.